The Influence of Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Structure, and Information Technology on Management Accounting Information System and Its Impact on Managerial Performance (Survey On People's Credit Banks (BPR) in Pontianak City).

Authors

  • Dr. Muhammad Syaifullah  Lecturer of Syariah and Islamic Economic Faculty, The State of Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Pontianak, Pontianak City, West Borneo, Indonesia

Keywords:

Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Structure, Information Technology, Management Accounting Information System, and Manager Performance.

Abstract

Background of this research is not quality management accounting information system found in organizations especially in BPR. The purpose of this research is to know the influence of environmental uncertainty, organizational structure, and information technology on management accounting information system and its impact on manager performance in BPR. This research uses quantitative research approach and explanatory survey method. The target population in this study are 9 (Nine) People's Credit Banks (BPR) in Pontianak City. Each BPR is drawn by 4 respondents: directors, accounting managers or accounting chiefs and accounting staff. The data used are primary data and secondary data. Testing Data, with Test of Validity and Test of Realibility. Research Analysis, used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for small sample with Partial Least Square (PLS) approach using Smart Software PLS 1.0 assistance. The results of the research are 1) Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Structure and Information Technology have a significant positive effect on Management Accounting Information System; 2) Management Accounting Information System has a significant positive effect on Managerial Performance; 3) The most dominant construct affecting the Management Accounting Information System constraint are the uncertainty of the Environmental uncertainty with the path parameter coefficient of 0.426 and T-Statistics 5,699; and 4) Environmental uncertainty, Organizational Structure and Information Technology effect on Managerial Performance with mediated by construct Management Accounting Information System.

References

  1. Agus Procoyo. 2003. Information Technology Indonesia in Highlight, Accessed from www.ebizzasia.com. Retrieved on September 25, 2011.
  2. Abernethy and Guthrie, C. H. 1994. An Empirical Assessment of the Fit between Strategy and Management Information Systems Design, Ac¬counting and Finance. November. pp. 49-66.
  3. Azhar Susanto. 2004. Management Information System, Issue 3, Lingga Jaya, Bandung
  4. Azhar Susanto. 2008. Accounting Information System: Computer Based Concept and Development, Initial Edition, First Printing, Lingga Jaya, Bandung
  5. Central Bureau of Statistics of West Kalimantan Province, Year 2011.
  6. Bentley, Lonnie D. & Whitten, Jeffrey L. 2007. Systems Analysis & Design for the Global Enterprise. McGraw-Hill Irwin. Seventh Edition, New York
  7. Bromwich, M. 1990. The Case for Stra¬tegic Management Accounting: The Role of Accounting Information for Strategy in Competitive Markets, Accounting Organization and Society. Vol. 15, pp. 27-46.
  8. Drajad Wibowo. 2011. After Fixing Internal Issues, Bank Capital Should Be Raised Immediately, Accessed from finance.detik.com. on September 30, 2011.
  9. Chenhall, R.H., & Morris, D. 1986. The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting Review, 61, 16 -35.
  10. Chia, Y.M. 1995. Decentralization, management accounting system, MAS information characteristics and their interaction effects on managerial performance: A Singapore study. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 22, 811-830.
  11. --.1990. Is there a contingency theory of management accounting systems design ?. Singapore Accountant, 11-14.
  12. Chin, W. 1998. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Eds), Modern Methods for Business Research,
  13. Chong, V.K. 1996. Management accounting systems, task uncertainty and managerial performance: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 415-421.
  14. Chong, V.K. & Chong K.M. 1997. Startegic choices, environmental uncertainty and SBU performance: A note on the intervening role of management accounting systems. Accounting and Business Research Vol. 27, No.4, pp.268-276.
  15. Chong, VK., Ian RC. Eggleton and Michele Leong. 2001. The Impact of Market Competition and Budgetary Participation on Performance and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from The Australian Banking and Financial Services Sectors. The 2000 Asian-Pacific Conference on International Accounting Issues, Beijing, China.
  16. Gordon, L.A., & Narayanan, V.K. 1984. Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty, and organization structure: empirical analysis. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 9, 33-47.
  17. Duncan, R.B. 1972. Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Administrative Science Quartely. P 313-327
  18. Efron, B., and R. Tibshirani. 1986. Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy, Statistical Science, Vol. 1, 54-77.
  19. Efron, B. 1979. Bootstrap Methods: another Look at the Jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
  20. Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Structural Equation Modeling Alternative Method with Partial Least Square, Diponegoro University Publishing Agency, Semarang.
  21. --.. 2008. Structural Equation Model Concepts and Applications with Amos 16.0 Program, Diponegoro University Publishing Agency, Semarang.
  22. Govindarajan, V. 1984. Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environment uncertainty as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 9, 33-47.
  23. Govindarajan & J. Fisher. 1991. Strategy, System Control, and Resources Sharing, Effects Business-Unit Performance, Accounting and Business Research
  24. Chong & Kar. 1997. Choice Strategy, Enviromental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note The Intervening Role of Management Accounting System
  25. Gerloff, E.A. 1991. Organizational Theory and Design-A Strategic Approach for Managemen, New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.
  26. Greenberg, Edward S, Sikora Patricia B, Grunberg Leon and Moore Sarah.. 2005. Work Teams and Organizational Commitment: Exploring the Influence of the Team Experience on Employee Attitudes, (Working Paper). Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.
  27. Gul, F.A. 1991. The effect of management accounting systems and environmental uncertainty on small business manager's performance. Accounting and Business Research, 22, 57-61.
  28. --& Chia, Y.M. 1994. The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, no. 4/5, 413-426.
  29. Hair, J.F, R.E Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W.C. Black. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  30. Hair F. J. Jr., Black W. C, Babin B. J, Anderson R. E and Tatham R. L. 2005. Multivariate Data Analysis. Sixth edition, Prentice hall. New Jersey
  31. Imam Ghozali. 2009. Application of Multivariate Analysis with SPSS Program. Fourth Edition, Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.
  32. Joko Suyanto. 2011. http://ekonomi.inilah.com, Accessed November
  33. Laudon Kenneth C & Jane P. Laudon. 2005. Management Information Systems: New Approaches to Organization & Technology, International Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  34. Luthans, Fred. 2002. Organizational Behavior, International Edition, Ninth Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill
  35. Mahdi Mahmudy. 2011. http://ekonomi.inilah.com, Accessed November
  36. Mia, L., & Chenhall, R.H. 1994, The usefulness of management accouning systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 19, 1-13.
  37. Mia, L. and Clarke, B. 1999. Market Competition, Management Ac¬counting Systems and Business Unit Performance, Management Accounting Research. Vol. 10, pp. 137-158.
  38. Muslimin Anwar. 2011. Republika.co.id, Accessed November
  39. Nadler, D.A. & Tushman, M.L. 1988. Strategic Organiztion Design, Concepts, Tools and Processes. USA: Harper Collins. Otley, D.T. 1980. The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5,413-428.
  40. Riyanto, Bambang. 1999. Identification of Management Accounting Research Issues: Contingency Approach. Media Accounting, No.34 / Th.VI April 1999.
  41. Mahoney, T.A, Jerdee, T.H. and Carroll, S.J. 1963. Development of Managerial Performance: a Research Approach. Cincinnati. Ohio: South Westrn Publishing Co.
  42. Mc Leod, Raymond Jr. & George P. Schell. 2007. Management Information
  43. System, Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey
  44. Mc Leod, Raymond Jr & George P. Schell. 2007. Management Information System, Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey
  45. MoLeong, Lexy J. 2008. Qualitative Research Methodology, PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  46. O'Brien, James A. & Marakas, George M. 2008. Introduction To Information Systems, Fourteenth Edition, MCGraw-Hill Irwin, New York
  47. Robbins, S.P. and Coulter, M. 2005. Management, International Edition, Eighth Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  48. Romney Marshall B & Paul John Steinbart. 2006. Accounting Information Systems, 9 ed, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  49. Richard Kumaradjaja. 2009. E-Strategy; Establish Integrated HR management information system, Retrieved from web.bisnis.com on September 25, 2011.
  50. Now, Uma. 2003., Research Methods fo Business A Skill Building Approach, Fourth Edition, john Willey & Sons, Inc
  51. Sugiama, A Gima. 2008. Research Methods Business and Management, First Edition, Guardaya Intimarta, Bandung
  52. Turban, E. McLean, E & Wetherbe, J. 1999. Information Tecnology For Management: Making Konnection For Strategic Advance. John Wiley & Son. Inc.
  53. Waterhouse, J.H., & Tiessen, P. 1978. A contingency framework for management acoounting systems research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3, 65-76.
  54. Wenny Setiawati. 2007. Implementation of e-Government in Indonesia, Accessed from www.komunikasipublik.multiply.com on September 25, 2011.
  55. Wold, H. 1985. Partial Least Square, In S Kotz & N.L. Johnson (Eds), Encyclopedia Statistical Sciences. Vol. 8 (pp. 587-599), New York, Wiley.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

Issue

Volume 2, Issue 6, November-December-2017

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. Muhammad Syaifullah, " The Influence of Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Structure, and Information Technology on Management Accounting Information System and Its Impact on Managerial Performance (Survey On People's Credit Banks (BPR) in Pontianak City). , IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 2, Issue 6, pp.1119-1132, November-December-2017.