Stimulating Approach for Cost Analysis in Activities of Software Debugging
Keywords:
Cost analysis, stimulation, COPSEMO, COCOMO, debuggers.Abstract
My research aggregates an predicted end result depending on one of the preceding published papers which is related to systematic approach to price evaluation and beneficial for the employer. Traditionally we discussed about software implementation with respect to software quality assurance for incentive system applications and for software debugging implications in software incentive applications. We extend our research to support and provide debugging parameters for software procedures. This additionally provides every other stimulating version consisting of COPSEMO and COCOMO. This analysis of stimulation is computed based totally on the limitations of debuggers and disregarding them. These computations result in development in the fee evaluation, enhance the chance for the enhancement of the constraints of debuggers, and triumph over the constraints periodically. This systematic method allows us to approximate the value analysis at the side of the optimization that allows us to be beneficial for the customers and the developers.
References
- M. Xie, Software Reliability Modeling. :World Scientific Publishing Company, 1991.
- Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. : McGraw Hill, 1996.
- J. D. Musa, A. Iannino, and K. Okumoto, Software Reliability, Measurement, Prediction and Application. : McGraw Hill, 1987.
- H. Pham, Software Reliability. : Springer-Verlag, 2000.
- C. T. Lin and C. Y. Huang, "Enhancing and measuring the predictive capabilities of testing-effort dependent software reliability models," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1025–1038, June 2008.
- Y. S. Su and C. Y. Huang, "Neural-network-based approaches for software reliability estimation and using dynamic weighted combinational models," Journal of SS, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 606–615, April 2007.
- S. Gokhale and M. R. Lyu, "A simulation approach to structure-based software reliability analysis," IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol.31, no. 8, pp. 643–656, August 2005.
- S. Gokhale, "Architecture-based software reliability analysis: Overview and limitations," IEEE Trans. Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–40, Jan. 2007.
- K. Kanoun and J. C. Laprie, "Software reliability trend analyses from theoretical to practical considerations," IEEE Trans. Software Engineering,vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 740–747, Sept. 1994.
- C. Y. Huang, M. R. Lyu, and S. Y. Kuo, "A unified scheme of somenon-homogenous Poisson process models for software reliability estimation," IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp.261–269-2003
- IEEE Recommended Practice for the Evaluation and Selection of CASE ToolsThe Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017, 1992. ANSI/IEEE Std. 1209-1992.
- Alan W. Brown, David J. Carney, Paul C. Clements, “A Case Study in Assessing the Maintainability of a Large, SoftwareIntensive System,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Engineering of Computer Based Systems, Tucson, AZ., IEEE Computer Society, March 1995
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.