Enhancing the Energy Efficiency of Virtual Network Embedding in Cloud

Authors

  • Devagudi Siva Sankar  Student, Department of CSE, Seshachala Institute of Technology, Puttur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • P. Chandra Prakash  Assisstant Professor, Department of CSE, Seshachala Institute of Technology, Puttur, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Cloud networks, energy efficient networks, IP over WDM networks, MILP, network virtualization, optical OFDM, virtual network embedding.

Abstract

System Virtualization is perceived as a key innovation for the long term internet. Vitality productivity is one a few of the most challenges in future networking environments. Network virtualization has caught the attention of the many researchers in recent years. It facilitates the method of making many virtual networks over one physical network. In the existing system, if any one of the machines will get broken means then we are able to simply transfer all the information corresponding to that machine to a different machine. here we tend to concentrate on only data we don’t take into account network efficiency, cost, and power consumption.to overcome this problem we move to the proposed model. The aim of this paper, we will be inclined to endorse a power sparing digital system putting in (EEVNE) method for distributed computing structures, wherever manage investment budget are provided by using solidifying property inside the device and server farms. We show our method in an ip over WDM plan the utilization of joined whole collection facilitate programming (MILP). The execution of the EEVNE strategy is separated and some comes closer to the composed works of artwork: the measurements change capacity cost system (CostVNE) what is more the vitality mindful method (VNE-EA). The CostVNE method pushes the use of open realities transmission, regardless of the fact that the VNE-EA method compels the potential use with the guide of reducing the extent of commenced middle points and institutions at the same time as no longer mulling over the granular energy usage of the facts focuses and furthermore the definitely particular device devices. The consequences show that the EEVNE show accomplishes the most strength sparing of 60% (ordinary 20%) contrasted with the CostVNE display underneath an energy wasteful server farm manage profile. We have a propensity to accumulate a heuristic, non-stop vitality streamlined VNE (REOViNE), with manipulate reserve funds drawing nearer those of the EEVNE display. We have a tendency to furthermore take a look at the one of a kind methodologies receiving a power effective server farm control profile.

References

  1. M A. Sharkh, M. Jammal, A. Shami, and A. Ouda, Resource allocation in a network-based cloud computing environment: Design challenges, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 46–52, 2013.
  2. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Report to Congress on Server and Data Center Energy Efficiency Public Law 109-431. (2007). [Online]. Available: http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/ prod_development/downloads/EPA_Datacenter_Report_Congress_Final1. pdf.
  3. A. Q. Lawey, T. E. H. El-Gorashi, and J. M. H. Elmirghani, Distributed energy efficient clouds over core networks,IEEE J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1261–1281, Jan. 2014.
  4. R. Jain and S. Paul, Network virtualization and software defined networking for cloud computing: A survey,IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 24–31, Nov. 2013.
  5. A Belbekkouche, M. M. Hasan, and A. Karmouch, discovery and allocation in network virtualization, IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1114–1128, Oct.–Dec. 2012.
  6. N. M. M. K. Chowdhury and R. Boutaba, Network virtualization: State of the art and research challenges, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 20–26, Jul. 2009.
  7. A. Fischer, M. T. Beck, H. De Meer, and X. Hesselbach, Virtual network embedding: A survey, IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1888–1906, Oct.–Dec. 2013.
  8. B. Wang, X. Chang, J. Liu, and J. K. Muppala, Reducing power consumption in embedding virtual infrastructures, in Proc. IEEE Globecom Workshops, Dec. 3–7, 2012, pp. 714–718.
  9. M Yu, Y. Yi, J. Rexford, and M. Chiang, Rethinking virtual network embedding: Substrate support for path splitting and migration, SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 38, no. 2. pp. 17–29, 2008.
  10. C. Yang, J. Li, T. Wo, C. Hu, and W. Liu, Resilient virtual network service provision in network virtualization environments, in Proc. 16th Int Conf.Parallel Distrib. Syst., 2010.
  11. D. G. Anderson, (2002). Theoretical Approaches to Node Assignment. [Online]. Available: http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1079&context = compsci.
  12. J.F. Botero, X. Hesselbach, M. Duelli, D. Schlosser, A. Fischer, and H. De Meer, Energy efficient virtual network embedding, IEEE Commun., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 756–759, May 2012.
  13. S. Sen, Z. Zhongbao, C. Xiang, W. Yiwen, L. Yan, and W. Jie, Energyaware virtual network embedding through consolidation, in Proc. IEEE Comput. Commun. Workshops, 2012, pp. 127–132.
  14. J. F. Botero and X. Hesselbach, Greener networking in a network virtualization environment, Comput. Netw., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2021–2039, 2013.
  15. S. Su, Z. Zhang, A.X. Liu, X. Cheng, Y. Wang, and X. Zhao, Energyaware virtual network embedding, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1607–1620, Oct. 2014.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Devagudi Siva Sankar, P. Chandra Prakash, " Enhancing the Energy Efficiency of Virtual Network Embedding in Cloud, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp.1070-1074, May-June-2018.