Comparison of Various Image Edge Detection Techniques for Brain Tumor Detection

Authors

  • Jennifer P.  Department of Computer Applications Dr.N.G.P Arts and Science College Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Dr. D. Devi Aruna  Department of Computer Applications Dr.N.G.P Arts and Science College Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Keywords:

Brain Tumor, Edge Detection, Canny, Laplacian of Gaussian, Robert, Prewitt, Sobel

Abstract

Brain tumors are created by abnormal and uncontrolled cell division in brain itself. If the growth becomes more than 50%, then the patient is not able to recover. So the detection of brain tumor needs to be fast and accurate. In this paper the comparative analysis of various Image Edge Detection techniques is presented. The experiment is conducted using MATLAB 7.0. It has been shown that the Canny’s edge detection algorithm performs better than all these operators under almost all scenarios. Evaluation of the images showed that under noisy conditions Canny, LoG( Laplacian of Gaussian), Robert, Prewitt, Sobel exhibit better performance, respectively. It has been observed that Canny’s edge detection algorithm is computationally more expensive compared to LoG( Laplacian of Gaussian), Sobel, Prewitt and Robert’s operator.

References

  1. Canny, J., "A Computational Approach to Edge Detector", IEEE Transactions on PAMI, pp679- 698, 1986.
  2. Bovik, A. C., Huaung, T. S. and JR. D. C. M. "Nonparametric tests for edge detection noise", Pattern Recognition, 19:209-219, 1986.
  3. Yakimovsky Y., "Boundary and object detection in real world image", Journal ACM, 23:599-618, 1976.
  4. Raman Maini and J. S. Sobel, "Performance Evaluation of Prewitt Edge Detector for Noisy Images", GVIP Journal, Vol. 6, Issue 3, December 2006.
  5. Davis, L. S., "Edge detection techniques", Computer Graphics Image Process. (4), 248-270, 1995.
  6. Sharifi, M.; Fathy, M.; Mahmoudi, M.T.; "A classified and comparative study of edge detection algorithms", International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, Proceedings, Page(s):117 – 120, 8-10 April 2002.
  7. Shin, M.C.; Goldgof, D.B.; Bowyer, K.W.; Nikiforou, S.; " Comparison of edge detection algorithms using a structure from motion task", Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, IEEE Transactions on Volume 31, Issue 4, Page(s):589-601, Aug. 2001.
  8. Heath M. , Sarker S., Sanocki T. and Bowyer K.,"Comparison of Edge Detectors: A Methodology and Initial Study", Proceedings of CVPR'96 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.143-148, 1996.
  9. Rital, S.; Bretto, A.; Cherifi, H.; Aboutajdine, D.; "A combinatorial edge detection algorithm on noisy images", Video/Image Processing and Multimedia Communications 4th EURASIPIEEE Region 8 International Symposium on VIPromCom, Page(s):351 – 355, 16-19 June 2002.
  10. Li Dong Zhang; Du Yan Bi; "An improved morphological gradient edge detection algorithm", Communications and Information Technology, ISCIT 2005. IEEE International Symposium on Volume 2, Page(s):1280 – 1283, 12-14 Oct. 2005.
  11. Zhao Yu-qian; Gui Wei-hua; Chen Zhen-cheng; Tang Jing-tian; Li Ling-yun; "Medical Images Edge Detection Based on Mathematical Morphology" Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEEEMBS. 27th Annual International Conference, Page(s):6492 – 6495, 01-04 Sept. 2005.
  12. Fesharaki, M.N.; Hellestrand, G.R.; "A new edge detection algorithm based on a statistical approach", Speech, Image Processing and Neural Networks, Proceedings, ISSIPNN '94., International Symposium, Page(s):21 - 24 vol.1, 13-16 April 1994.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-28

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Jennifer P., Dr. D. Devi Aruna, " Comparison of Various Image Edge Detection Techniques for Brain Tumor Detection, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp.231-235, January-February-2017.