Analysing the Social Data Opinion through Public User Raw Information

Authors(4) :-T. Sakthisree, Dhivya N, Nithyananthan R, Pavithira T

The social network perspective provides a set of methods for revealing the structure of social networks as well as a variety of hypothesis explaining the patterns discovered in these structures. The study of these structures uses social network discovering to recognizing local and global patterns; locate influential entities, and proficiency network dynamics. Millions of users share their opinions on Social Networks, making it a valuable platform for tracing and analyzing public sentiment. Such tracking and analysis can provide critical information for decision making in various domains. Therefore it has captivated attention in both academia and industry. This approach needs Sentimental data analysis model using Neural Networks. Both positive and negative also comments will be calculated here. To further enhance the readability of the mined reasons, we select the most representative tweets for foreground topics and develop another generative model called Reason Candidate and Background LDA (RCB-LDA) to rank them with respect to their popularity within the variation period. Experimental results show that our methods can effectively find foreground topics and rank reason candidates.

Authors and Affiliations

T. Sakthisree
Computer Science and Engineering, Kathir College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Dhivya N
Computer Science and Engineering, Kathir College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Nithyananthan R
Computer Science and Engineering, Kathir College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Pavithira T
Computer Science and Engineering, Kathir College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

LDA, RCB-LDA, KDD, CVS, SVN, ANY, ANN

  1. H. Becker, M. Naaman, and L. Gravano, "Learning similarity met-rics for event identification in social media," in Proc. 3rd ACM WSDM, Macau, China, 2010.
  2. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, "Latent dirichlet allocation," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 3, pp. 993–1022, Jan. 2003. TAN ET AL.: INTERPRETING THE PUBLIC SENTIMENT VARIATIONS ON TWITTER 1169
  3. J. Bollen, H. Mao, and A. Pepe, "Modeling public mood and emo-tion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena," inProc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media, Barcelona, Spain, 2011.
  4. J. Bollen, H. Mao, and X. Zeng, "Twitter mood predicts the stock market,"J. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2011.
  5. D. Chakrabarti and K. Punera, "Event summarization using tweets," in Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media, Barcelona, Spain, 2011.
  6. A. Go, R. Bhayani, and L. Huang, "Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision," CS224N Project Rep., Stanford: 1–12, 2009.
  7. T. L. Griffiths and M. Steyvers, "Finding scientific topics," inProc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 101, (Suppl. 1), pp. 5228–5235, Apr. 2004.
  8. D. Hall, D. Jurafsky, and C. D. Manning, "Studying the history of ideas using topic models," inProc. Conf. EMNLP,Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2008, pp. 363–371.
  9. G. Heinrich, "Parameter estimation for text analysis," Fraunhofer IGD, Darmstadt, Germany, Univ. Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, Tech. Rep., 2009.
  10. Z. Hong, X. Mei, and D. Tao, "Dual-force metric learning for robust distracter-resistant tracker," in Proc. ECCV, Florence, Italy, 2012.
  11. M. Hu and B. Liu, "Mining and summarizing customer reviews," in Proc. 10th ACM SIGKDD, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  12. Y. Hu, A. John, F. Wang, and D. D. Seligmann, "Et-lda: Joint topic modeling for aligning events and their twitter feedback," inProc. 26th AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2012.
  13. L. Jiang, M. Yu, M. Zhou, X. Liu, and T. Zhao, "Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification," in Proc. 49th HLT, Portland, OR, USA, 2011.
  14. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, and J. Kleinberg, "Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle," in Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD, Paris, France, 2009.
  15. C. X. Lin, B. Zhao, Q. Mei, and J. Han, "Pet: A statistical model for popular events tracking in social communities," in Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  16. F. Liu, Y. Liu, and F. Weng, "Why is "SXSW" trending? Exploring multiple text sources for twitter topic summarization," inProc. Workshop LSM, Portland, OR, USA, 2011.
  17. T. Minka and J. Lafferty, "Expectation-propagation for the gener-ative aspect model," inProc.18th Conf. UAI, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2002.
  18. G. Mishne and N. Glance, "Predicting movie sales from blogger sentiment," inProc. AAAI-CAAW, Stanford, CA, USA, 2006.
  19. B. O’Connor, R. Balasubramanyan, B. R. Routledge, and N. A. Smith, "From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series," inProc. 4th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  20. B. Pang and L. Lee, "Opinion mining and sentiment analysis," Found. Trends Inform. Retrieval, vol. 2, no. (1–2), pp. 1–135, 2008

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 2 | Issue 2 | March-April 2017
Date of Publication : 2017-04-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 504-509
Manuscript Number : CSEIT1722164
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-3307

Cite This Article :

T. Sakthisree, Dhivya N, Nithyananthan R, Pavithira T, "Analysing the Social Data Opinion through Public User Raw Information", International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp.504-509, March-April-2017.
Journal URL : http://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT1722164

Article Preview

Follow Us

Contact Us