Two Phase Image Denoising By Principal Component Analysis and Local Pixel Grouping

Authors

  • Nain Yadav  Department of Computer Science, Naraina Group of Institutions, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Denoising, Principal component analysis, Edge preservation

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient image denoising scheme by using principal component analysis (PCA) with local pixel grouping (LPG). For a better preservation of image local structures, a pixel and its nearest neighbors are modeled as a vector variable, whose training samples are selected from the local window by using block matching based LPG. Such an LPG procedure guarantees that only the sample blocks with similar contents are used in the local statistics calculation for PCA transform estimation, so that the image local features can be well preserved after coefficient shrinkage in the PCA domain to remove the noise. The LPG-PCA denoising procedure is iterated one more time to further improve the denoising performance, and the noise level is adaptively adjusted in the second stage. Experimental results on benchmark test images demonstrate that the LPG-PCA method achieves very competitive denoising performance, especially in image fine structure preservation, compared with state-of-the-art denoising algorithms.

References

  1. D. L. Donoho, De-noising by soft thresholding, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 41 (1995) 613-627.
  2. R.R. Coifman, D.L. Donoho, Translation-invariant de-noising, in: A. Antoniadis, G. Oppenheim (Eds.), Wavelet and Statistics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1995.
  3. M.K. Mıhc- ak, I. Kozintsev, K. Ramchandran, P. Moulin, Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients, IEEE Signal Processing Letters 6 (12) (1999) 300-303.
  4. Pizurica, W. Philips, Estimating the probability of the presence of a signal of interest in multire solution single- and multiband image denoising, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 15 (3) (2006) 654-665.
  5. J.L. Starck, E.J. Candes, D.L. Donoho, The curvelet transform for image denoising, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 11 (6) (2002) 670-684.
  6. G.Y. Chen, B. Ke´ gl, Image denoising with complex ridgelets, Pattern Recognition 40 (2) (2007) 578-585.
  7. M. Elad, M. Aharon, Image denoising via sparse and redundant representa- tions over learned dictionaries, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 15 (12) (2006) 3736-3745.
  8. M. Aharon, M. Elad, A.M. Bruckstein, The K-SVD: an algorithm for designing of overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation, IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing 54 (11) (2006) 4311-4322.
  9. Foi, V. Katkovnik, K. Egiazarian, Pointwise shape-adaptive DCT for high- quality denoising and deblocking of grayscale and color images, IEEE Transaction on Image Processing 16 (5) (2007).
  10. Tomasi, R. Manduchi, Bilateral filtering for gray and colour images, in: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, India, 1998, pp. 839-846.
  11. Buades, B. Coll, J.M. Morel, A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one, Multiscale Modeling Simulation 4 (2) (2005) 490-530.
  12. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, K. Egiazarian, Image denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering, IEEE Transaction on Image Proces- sing 16 (8) (2007) 2080-2095.
  13. S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, New York, 1998.
  14. R.C. Gonzalez, R.E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, second ed., Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Nain Yadav, " Two Phase Image Denoising By Principal Component Analysis and Local Pixel Grouping , IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp.844-846, May-June-2017.