Different QOS Based Comparative Simulation Evaluation of AODV and OLSR Based on EXTENDED Rate PHY_802.11g for 54 Mbps

Authors

  • Ruchita  M-Tech Department of CSE, SITM, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Mamta Sachdeva  Department of CSE, SITM, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Jonish  Department of CSE, Sonepat, Haryana, India

Keywords:

MANET, QOS, OPNET, IEEE, OLSR, AODV

Abstract

In this paper analysis of Comparative performance of OLSR and AODV is done for Extended Rate PHY (802.11g) on 54mbps data rate. We used OPNET Simulation tool we created a network containing 25 mobile nodes with data rate 54 Mbps with transmission power 0.005 watts and buffer size 256000 bits each node moves randomly in the network and simulation time was 1500 sec. OLSR And AODV on Extended Rate PHY (802.11g) WLAN are compared in terms of 54 Mbps for different QOS’s. According to the resulted performance we can say that OLSR performed better in our QOS with Extended Rate PHY (802.11g). The simulation result of the research has practical reference value for further study.

References

  1. R Jonish, Kapil Chawla, "Different QOS Based Simulation Evaluation of TORA and GRP Routing Protocol Based on Frequency Hopping", IJCSMC, Vol. 3, Issue. 11, November 2014, pg. 523 – 531.
  2. Anjali, Maninder Singh, "Performance Analysis of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid MANET Routing Protocols on IEEE 802.11 Standard", International Journal of Computer Applications,pp.1-8,Volume 54-No.12,September 2012.
  3. Anjali, Maninder Singh, "Simulation and Performance Analysis of AODV, OLSR, GRP Routing Protocol by considering IEEE 802.11Standard", IJARCSSE, Volume2, issue 6, pp-171-178,June 2012.
  4. Ravinder Ahuja, "Simulation based Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Reactive, Proactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols based on Random Waypoint Mobility Model", International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 7, No.11, pp. 20-24, Oct. 2010.
  5. Kuldeep Vats, Monika Sachdeva and Dr. Krishan Saluja, "Simulation and performance Analysis of OLSR, GRP, DSR Routing Protocol using OPNET", International Journal of Emerging trends in Engineering and Development, Vol.2 ,Issue 2, pp 390-404, March-2012.
  6. Pravin GhoseKar, Girish Katkar and Dr. Pradip Ghorpade, "Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Imperatives and Challenges",IJCA, pp. 153-158, 2010.
  7. Xiaoyan Hong, Kaixin Xu and Mario Gerla, "Scalable Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks", IEEE Network, vol. 16, issue 4, pp 11-21, Aug.2002.
  8. Mostafa Fazeli, "Assessment Of Throughput Performance Under OPNET Modeler Simulation Tools In Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs)" 3rd ICCI,CSN , IEEE 2011.
  9. Ashish Shrestha and Firat Tekiner, "On MANET Routing Protocols for Mobility and Scalability." In International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, p.p. 451-456, November 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
  10. Guo, L, and Peng, Y. (2010) "Performance evaluation for on-demand routing protocol based on OPNET modules in wireless mesh network" Computer and Electrical Engineering (Elsevier), vol. 37(2011), pp. 106-114.
  11. T.H. Clausen, "The optimized link state routing protocol evaluating through experiments and simulation" mind pass centre for distributed system, Aalborg university ,Denmark.
  12. Wikipedia Internet : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11g-2003
  13. Opnet Technologies, Inc. "Opnet Simulator," Internet: www.opnet.com

Downloads

Published

2017-10-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Ruchita, Mamta Sachdeva, Jonish, " Different QOS Based Comparative Simulation Evaluation of AODV and OLSR Based on EXTENDED Rate PHY_802.11g for 54 Mbps, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 2, Issue 5, pp.414-419, September-October-2017.