Page Rank Computation [PRC] in INformation Assimilation & Retrieval (INAR) System

Authors

  • Dr. L. Senthilvadivu  Principal, Mahendra Arts & Science College, Kalipatti, Tamil Nadu, India

Keywords:

INAR, Assimilation, heterogeneous, queries

Abstract

The World Wide Web consists of millions of web pages and hyperlinks with which the most visited page and the number of hyperlinks in the page decide on the page rank. The page rank of a page is defined recursively and depends on the number and page rank metric of all pages that link to it. A page that is linked to by many pages with high page rank receives a high rank itself. In the INformation Assimilation and Retrieval (INAR) system, the page rank can be predictable based on the selection of the pages by the user who decide the page as the positive result of the search while inflowing the queries as search key from the heterogeneous and multi related information sources. The positive results of the users can be favored if and only if the page is the most relevant one for the queries posted by the user.

References

  1. Beel, Joran and Gipp, Bela and Wilde, Erik (2010). "Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co.". Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190.
  2. L. Senthilvadivu, K. Duraiswamy (2011) "Conniving the Information Assimilation and Retrieval (INAR) system for the heterogeneous, multi related Information Sources", World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal pp.357-363. 
  3. Jon Kleinberg (1999) "Mining the link structure of the World Wide Web and Trawling the Web for emerging cyber-communities" Eighth World Wide Web conference, Toronto, Canada
  4. (2006, August) Click through Rate of Google Search Results - AOL-data.tgz - Want to Know How Many Clicks The no.1 Google Position Gets? Red Cardinal Blog. Red Cardinal Ltd.
  5. J. Bailey, C. Zhang, D. Budgen, M. Turner, and S. Charters (2007), "Search Engine Overlaps: Do they agree or disagree?" in Second International Workshop on Realizing Evidence-Based Software Engineering (REBSE '07), p2.
  6. K. Yang and L. I. Meho (2006) "Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science," in 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin (US), pp. 3–8.
  7. W. H. Walters (July 2007), "Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field," Information Processing & Management, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1121–1132.
  8. J. J. Meier and T. W. Conkling (2008), "Google Scholar’s Coverage of the Engineering Literature: An Empirical Study," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 34, no. 34, pp. 196–201.
  9. J. Bar-Ilan (2007), "Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar," Scientometrics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 257–271.
  10. P. Jacso (2005), "Google Scholar: the pros and the cons," Online Information Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 208–214.
  11. B. White (2006), "Examining the claims of Google Scholar as a serious information source," New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 11–24.
  12. (2008) About Google Scholar. Website. GoogleInc.OnlineAvailable:http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/ about.html
  13. J. Beel and B. Gipp, (2009) "Google Scholar's Ranking Algorithm: An Introductory Overview.
  14. Jon Kleinberg (2011), IBM's Almaden Research Center

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Volume 3, Issue 3, March-April-2018

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Dr. L. Senthilvadivu, " Page Rank Computation [PRC] in INformation Assimilation & Retrieval (INAR) System , IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp.573-577, March-April-2018.