The use of Tweet investigation in Real-Time Event detection and Earthquake Reporting System expansion

Authors(2) :-N.Mownika Chowdary, Dr. E. Kesavulu Reddy

Twitter has received lots of attention recently. a very vital characteristic of Twitter is its amount of your time nature. Abstraction event foretelling from social media is maybe terribly useful but suffers from essential challenges, just like the dynamic patterns of choices (keywords) and geographic non uniformity (e.g., abstraction correlations, unbalanced samples, and completely totally different populations in varied locations). Most existing approaches (e.g., LASSO regression, dynamic question enlargement, and burst detection) address some, but not all, of these challenges. We tend to tend to research the amount of your time interaction of events like earthquakes in Twitter Associate in Nursing propose a rule to look at tweets and to look at a target event. To look at a target event, we tend to tend to plot a classifier of tweets supported choices just like the keywords during a tweet, the number of words, and their context. Later, we tend to tend to show out a probabilistic spatiotemporal model for the target event which can notice the center of the event location. We tend to tend to treat each Twitter user as a sensor and apply particle filtering, that unit of measurement wide used for location estimation. The particle filter works on top of totally different comparable ways for estimating the locations of target events.

Authors and Affiliations

N.Mownika Chowdary
PG Scholar, Dept of Computer Science, S.V. University, Tirupati, AP, India \Assistant Professor, Dept of Computer Science, S.V. University,Tirupati, AP,India
Dr. E. Kesavulu Reddy

Twitter, event detection, , earthquake, LASSO

  1. M. Sarah, C. Abdur, H. Gregor, L. Ben, and M. Roger, “Twitter and the Micro-Messaging Revolution,” technical report, O’Reilly Radar, 2008.
  2. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng, “Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities,” Proc. Ninth WebKDD and First SNA-KDD Workshop Web Mining and Social Network Analysis (WebKDD/SNA-KDD ’07), pp. 56-65, 2007.
  3. B. Huberman, D. Romero, and F. Wu, “Social Networks that Matter: Twitter under the Microscope,” ArXiv E-Prints, http:// arxiv.org/abs/0812.1045, Dec. 2008.
  4. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon, “What is Twitter, A Social Network or A News Media?” Proc. 19th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’10), pp. 591-600, 2010.
  5. G.L. Danah Boyd and S. Golder, “Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter,” Proc. 43rd Hawaii Int’l Conf. System Sciences (HICSS-43), 2010.
  6. A. Tumasjan, T.O. Sprenger, P.G. Sandner, and I.M. Welpe, “Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal About Political Sentiment,” Proc. Fourth Int’l AAAI Conf. Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2010.
  7. J. Hightower and G. Borriello, “Location Systems for Ubiquitous Computing,” Computer, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 57-66, 2001.
  8. M. Weiser, “The Computer for the Twenty-First Century,” Scientific Am., vol. 265, no. 3, pp. 94-104, 1991.
  9. V. Fox, J. Hightower, L. Liao, D. Schulz, and G. Borriello, “Bayesian Filtering for Location Estimation,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 24-33, July-Sept. 2003.
  10. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo, “Earthquake Shakes Twitter Users: Real-Time Event Detection by Social Sensors,” Proc. 19th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’10), pp. 851-860, 2010.
  11. Y. Raimond and S. Abdallah, “The Event Ontology,” http:// motools.sf.net/event/event.html, 2007.
  12. T. Joachims, “Text Categorization with Suport Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features,” Proc. 10th European Conf. Machine Learning (ECML ’98), pp. 137-142, 1998.
  13. A. Ritter, S. Clark Mausam, and O. Etzioni, “Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study,” Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2011.
  14. M. Arulampalam, S. Maskell, N. Gordon, and T. Clapp, “A Tutorial on Particle Filters for Online Nonlinear/NonGaussian Bayesian Tracking,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 174-188, Feb. 2002.
  15. W. Zhu, C. Chen, and R.B. Allen, “Analyzing the Propagation of Influence and Concept Evolution in Enterprise Social Networks Through Centrality and Latent Semantic Analysis,” Proc. 12th Pacific-Asia Conf. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD ’08), pp. 1090-1098, 2008.
  16. X. Liu, S. Zhang, F. Wei, and M. Zhou, “Recognizing Named Entities in Tweets,” Proc. 49th Ann. Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLT ’11), pp. 359-367, June 2011.
  17. J. Leskovec, L.A. Adamic, and B.A. Huberman, “The Dynamics of Viral Marketing,” Proc. Seventh ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (EC ’06), pp. 228-237, 2006.
  18. Y. Matsuo and H. Yamamoto, “Community Gravity: Measuring Bidirectional Effects by Trust and Rating on Online Social Networks,” Proc. 18th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’09), pp. 751-760, 2009.
  19. W. Zhu, C. Chen, and R.B. Allen, “Analyzing the Propagation of Influence and Concept Evolution in Enterprise Social Networks Through Centrality and Latent Semantic Analysis,” Proc. 12th Pacific-Asia Conf. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD ’08), pp. 1090-1098, 2008.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 4 | March-April 2018
Date of Publication : 2018-04-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 1115-1120
Manuscript Number : CSEIT1833536
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-3307

Cite This Article :

N.Mownika Chowdary, Dr. E. Kesavulu Reddy, "The use of Tweet investigation in Real-Time Event detection and Earthquake Reporting System expansion", International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp.1115-1120, March-April-2018.
Journal URL : http://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT1833536

Article Preview