An Efficient Network-Based Spam Detection Structure for Reviews In Online Social Media

Authors(2) :-G. Prashanti, Tiruveedhula Priyanka

Todays, a major part of everyone trusts on content in social media like opinions and feedbacks of a topic or a product. The liability that anyone can take off a survey give a brilliant chance to spammers to compose spam surveys about products and services for various interests. Recognizing these spammers and the spam content is a wildly debated issue of research and in spite of the fact that an impressive number of studies have been done as of late toward this end, yet so far the procedures set forth still scarcely distinguish spam reviews, and none of them demonstrate the significance of each extracted feature type. In this investigation, we propose a novel structure, named NetSpam, which uses spam highlights for demonstrating review datasets as heterogeneous information networks to design spam detection method into a classification issue in such networks. Utilizing the significance of spam features help us to acquire better outcomes regarding different metrics on review datasets. The outcomes demonstrate that NetSpam results the existing methods and among four categories of features; including review-behavioral, user-behavioral, review-linguistic, user-linguistic, the first type of features performs better than the other categories. The contribution work is when user search query it will display all top-k products as well as recommendation of the product

Authors and Affiliations

G. Prashanti
MCA Department, Vignan's Lara Institute of Technology and Science, Vadlamudi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
Tiruveedhula Priyanka

Social Media, Social Network, Spammer, Spam Review, Fake Review, Heterogeneous Information Networks.

  1. J. Donfro, A whopping 20 % of yelp reviews are fake. http://www.businessinsider.com/20-percent-of-yelp-reviews-fake-2013-9. Accessed: 2015-07-30.
  2. M. Ott, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock. Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities. In ACM WWW, 2012.
  3. M. Ott, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock. Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination.In ACL, 2011.
  4. Ch. Xu and J. Zhang. Combating product review spam campaigns via multiple heterogeneous pairwise features. In SIAM International Confer-ence on Data Mining, 2014.
  5. N. Jindal and B. Liu. Opinion spam and analysis. In WSDM, 2008.
  6. F. Li, M. Huang, Y. Yang, and X. Zhu. Learning to identify review spam. Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; IJCAI, 2011.
  7. G. Fei, A. Mukherjee, B. Liu, M. Hsu, M. Castellanos, and R. Ghosh. Ex-ploiting burstiness in reviews for review spammer detection. In ICWSM, 2013.
  8. A. j. Minnich, N. Chavoshi, A. Mueen, S. Luan, and M. Faloutsos. Trueview: Harnessing the power of multiple review sites. In ACM WWW, 2015.
  9. B. Viswanath, M. Ahmad Bashir, M. Crovella, S. Guah, K. P. Gummadi, B. Krishnamurthy, and A. Mislove. Towards detecting anomalous user behavior in online social networks. In USENIX, 2014.
  10. H. Li, Z. Chen, B. Liu, X. Wei, and J. Shao. Spotting fake reviews via collective PU learning. In ICDM, 2014.
  11. L. Akoglu, R. Chandy, and C. Faloutsos. Opinion fraud detection in online reviews bynetwork effects. In ICWSM, 2013.
  12. R. Shebuti and L. Akoglu. Collective opinion spam detection: bridging review networksand metadata. In ACM KDD, 2015.
  13. S. Feng, R. Banerjee and Y. Choi. Syntactic stylometry for deception detection. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers; ACL, 2012.
  14. N. Jindal, B. Liu, and E.-P. Lim. Finding unusual review patterns using unexpected rules. In ACM CIKM, 2012.
  15. E.-P. Lim, V.-A. Nguyen, N. Jindal, B. Liu, and H. W. Lauw. Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In ACM CIKM, 2010.
  16. A. Mukherjee, A. Kumar, B. Liu, J. Wang, M. Hsu, M. Castellanos, and R. Ghosh. Spotting opinion spammers using behavioral footprints. In ACM KDD, 2013.
  17. S. Xie, G. Wang, S. Lin, and P. S. Yu. Review spam detection via temporal pattern discovery. In ACM KDD, 2012.
  18. G. Wang, S. Xie, B. Liu, and P. S. Yu. Review graph based online store review spammer detection. IEEE ICDM, 2011.
  19. Y. Sun and J. Han. Mining Heterogeneous Information Networks; Principles and Methodologies, In ICCCE, 2012.
  20. A. Mukerjee, V. Venkataraman, B. Liu, and N. Glance. What Yelp Fake Review Filter Might Be Doing?, In ICWSM, 2013.
  21. S. Feng, L. Xing, A. Gogar, and Y. Choi. Distributional footprints of deceptive product reviews. In ICWSM, 2012.
  22. Y. Sun, J. Han, X. Yan, P. S. Yu, and T. Wu. Pathsim: Meta path-based top-k similarity search in heterogeneous information networks. In VLDB, 2011.
  23. Y. Sun and J. Han. Rankclus: integrating clustering with ranking for heterogeneous information network analysis. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology, 2009.
  24. C. Luo, R. Guan, Z. Wang, and C. Lin. HetPathMine: A Novel Transduc-tive Classification Algorithm on Heterogeneous Information Networks. In ECIR, 2014.
  25. R. Hassanzadeh. Anomaly Detection in Online Social Networks: Using Datamining Techniques and Fuzzy Logic. Queensland University of Technology, Nov. 2014.
  26. M. Luca and G. Zervas. Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Compe-tition, and Yelp Review Fraud., SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016.
  27. E. D. Wahyuni and A. Djunaidy. Fake Review Detection From a Product Review Using Modified Method of Iterative Computation Framework. In Proceeding MATEC Web of Conferences. 2016.
  28. M. Crawford, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and J. D. Prusa. Reducing Feature set Explosion to Faciliate Real-World Review Sapm Detection. In Proceeding of 29th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. 2016.
  29. A. Mukherjee, B. Liu, and N. Glance. Spotting Fake Reviewer Groups in Consumer Reviews. In ACM WWW, 2012.
  30. A. Heydari, M. A. Tavakoli, N. Salim, and Z. Heydari. Detection of review spam: A survey. Expert Systems with Applicants, Elsevier, 2014.
  31. M. Crawford, T. D. Khoshgoftar, J. N. Prusa, A. Al. Ritcher, and H. Najada. Survey of Review Spam Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques. Journal of Big Data. 2015.
  32. H. Xue, F. Li, H. Seo, and R. Pluretti. Trust-Aware Review Spam Detection. IEEE Trustcom/ISPA . 2015.
  33. C. L. Lai, K. Q. Xu, R. Lau, Y. Li, and L. Jing. Toward a Language Modeling Approach for Consumer Review Spam Detection. In Proceed-ings of the 7th international conference on e-Business Engineering. 2011.
  34. N. Jindal and B. Liu. Opinion Spam and Analysis. In WSDM, 2008.
  35. S. Mukherjee, S. Dutta, and G. Weikum. Credible Review Detection with Limited Information using Consistency Features, In book: Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 2016.
  36. K. Weise. A Lie Detector Test for Online Reviewers. http://bloom.bg/1KAxzhK. Accessed: 2016-12-16.
  37. M. Salehi, R. Sharma, M. Marzolla, M. Magnani, P. Siyari, and D. Mon-tesi. Spreading processes in multilayer networks. In IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering. 2(2):65–83, 2015.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 4 | Issue 2 | March-April 2018
Date of Publication : 2018-04-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 101-107
Manuscript Number : CSEIT1833622
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-3307

Cite This Article :

G. Prashanti, Tiruveedhula Priyanka, "An Efficient Network-Based Spam Detection Structure for Reviews In Online Social Media", International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp.101-107, March-April-2018.
Journal URL : http://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT1833622

Article Preview

Follow Us

Contact Us