Pilot Support System : A Machine Learning Approach

Authors

  • Praveen Kumar K C  Assistant Professor, Department Of CSE,CIT, Gubbi, Karnataka, India
  • Sowrabha B S  UG Student CSE, CIT, Gubbi, 3Priyanka T S, UG Student CSE, CIT, Gubbi, Karnataka, India

Keywords:

Avionics Systems; Machine Learning; Big Data; Deep Learning; Pilot Analytics

Abstract

Pilots can be one of the factors in many air traffic accidents. When one or both pilots are impaired (e.g. fatigue, drunk or distracted), one or both pilots are disabled, one or both pilots are capable but wrong-headed, both pilots don’t have sufficient training, both pilots are fully capable but distracted, both pilots miscommunicate with the air traffic controller, or both pilots follow wrong instructions from the air traffic controller, the risk of accident will increase dramatically. In some of these cases, the risk can be mitigated by using big data and machine learning. The system will collect and analyze large amount of data about the state of the aircraft, e.g., the flight path, the immediate environment around the aircraft, the weather and terrain information, and the pilots’ input to control the aircraft. Additional sensors such as eye tracking devices and biological monitor can also be added to determine the condition of the pilots. If the pilots’ input does not match proper reaction to the situation or the pilots are impaired, the learning machine will first provide an advisory to the pilot. When the situation becomes more urgent, the advisory will be elevated to warning. If there is at least one capable pilot, these advisories and warnings may help the pilot take proper actions. If both pilots are impaired or incapable, a warning will be sent to the air traffic controllers so that they can take appropriate actions.

References

  1. H. Blair-Smith, "Ubiquitous big data vs. human frailty on the flight deck," 2014 IEEE/AIAA 33rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC),Colorado Springs, CO, 2014, pp. 2D5-1-2D5-9.doi: 10.1109/DASC.2014.6979434
  2. John A. Caldwell , Melissa M. Mallis , J. Lynn Caldwell , Michel A. Paul , James C. Miller , and David F. Neri, “Fatigue Countermeasures in Aviation,” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine x Vol. 80, No. 1 x January 2009
  3. Key Dismukes, Grant Young, and Robert Sumwalt, “Cockpit Interruptions and Distractions,” Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) Directline Issue Number 10: Dec 1998
  4. “Pilots: understand Impairment Risk,” NTSB Safety Alert, National Transportation Safety Board, SA-037 September 2014, revised December 2015
  5. “Pilots: Manage Risks to Ensure Safety,” NTSB Safety Alert, National Transportation Safety Board, SA-023 March 2013, revised December 2015
  6. M. Reynal, Y. Colineaux, A. Vernay, and F. Dehais, “Pilot Flynig vs. Pilot Monitoring during the approach phase: an eye-tracking study,” HCI-Aero '16, September 14 - 16, 2016, Paris, France. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2950112.2964583
  7. K. Kilingaru, J. Tweedale, and S. Thatcher, “Monitoring Pilot Situation Awareness,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy System vol 24, 2013

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Praveen Kumar K C, Sowrabha B S, " Pilot Support System : A Machine Learning Approach, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp.1965-1971, March-April-2018.