Dynamic Object Tracking and Occlusion Detection Based on Extended and Advanced Approach

Authors

  • CH. Bindusri  Computer Science Department, VR Siddhartha College, Student, Vijayawada, India
  • K. Srinivas  Computer Science Department, VR Siddhartha College, Student, Vijayawada, India

Keywords:

object tracking, object detection, object recognition, background subtraction, feature extraction, occlusion handling.

Abstract

In general Occlusion Detection is a challenging problem. Although different Detection algorithms were proposed, they all have problems in detecting occluded Objects. Some of those are Random Subspace Method (RSM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Active Contour Model.RSM Approach is used to detect the Pedestrians. To implement these mainly three types of datasets are to be taken PobleSec, INRIA, and Daimler Multicue dataset, Aditionally used linear SVM for Classification. Active Contour Model is used for finding object outline from an image. This Approach takes the advantage of the point distribution model to limit the shape. This algorithm is highly sensitive to the initialization of tracking, making it difficult to start tracking automatically. So to overcome this problem, in this project a novel technique is introduced namely Histogram Oriented Gradients Descriptor and Adabooster (HOGA) For Occlusion Handling and integrate this in a sliding window detection framework using HOG features and linear classification. The Proposed Tracking algorithm performs favorably against various methods that can be demonstrated by both qualitative and quantitative estimations challenging in a video sequences. The input for this project is live video. And the output is occlusion detection for the give video sequence.

References

  1. Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA: An insight into domain combinations. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2001, , 17 Suppl 1: S83-89.
  2. Ekman D, Bjorklund AK, Frey-Skott J, Elofsson A: Multi-domain proteins in the three kingdoms of life: orphan domains and other unassigned regions. Journal of molecular biology 2005, 348(1):231-243.
  3. Chothia C, Gough J, Vogel C, Teichmann SA: Evolution of the protein repertoire. Science (New York, NY 2003, 300(5626):1701-1703.
  4. Patthy L: Genome evolution and the evolution of exon-shuffling–a review. Gene 1999, 238(1):103-114.
  5. Addou S, Rentzsch R, Lee D, Orengo CA: Domain-based and familyspecific sequence identity thresholds increase the levels of reliable protein function transfer. Journal of molecular biology 2009, 387(2):416-430.
  6. Qingyao Wu, Yunming Ye, Michael Ng, Shen S. Ho, RuichaoShi,'Collective prediction of protein functions from protein-protein interaction networks',BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 15, No. Suppl 2. (2014), S9, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-s2-s9 Key: citeulike:13408097.
  7. Qingyao Wu, Zhenyu Wang, Chunshan Li, Yunming Ye, Yueping Li and NingSun,'Protein functional properties prediction in sparsely-label PPI networks through regularized non-negative matrix factorization',BMC Systems Biology 2015,doi:10.1186/1752-0509-9-S1-S9,21 January 2015.
  8. Catherine Ching Han Chang, Chen Li, Geoffrey I. Webb, BengTiTey, Jiangning Song &RamakrishnanNagasundaraRamanan,'Periscope: quantitative prediction of soluble protein expression in the periplasm of Escherichia coli',Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 21844 (2016),02 March 2016.
  9. Yi-FanLiou,Tamara,Vasylenko,Chia LunYeh,Wei-ChunLin, Shih Hsianghiu,Phasit,Charoenkwan,Li-Sun Shu,Shinn-Ying Ho,Hui-Ling Huang,'SCMMTP: identifying and characterizing membrane transport proteins using propensity scores of dipeptides',BMC Genomics, Dec 2015.
  10. Huang HL, Charoenkwan P, Kao TF, Lee HC, Chang FL, Huang WL, Ho SJ, Shu LS, Chen WL, Ho SY,'Prediction and analysis of protein solubility using a novel scoring card method with dipeptide composition',BMC Bioinformatics,13 December 2012.
  11. Hemalatha N, SiddhantNaik, JeasonRintonSaldanha,'Protein Structure and Function Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods – A Review',International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering,Vol.2,October 2014.
  12. e. a. Lan Liang, "MS-kNN: protein function prediction by integrating multiple data sources," BMC bioinformatics, 2014.
  13. Ben Hur A, Ong CS, Sonnenburg S, Schölkopf B, Rätsch G. Support Vector Machines and Kernels for Computational Biology. PLoS.comput. biol. 2008;4(10):e1000173.
  14. Guo Y, Yu L, Wen Z, Li M. Using support vector machine combined with auto covariance to predict proteinprotein interactions from protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(9):3025–3030.
  15. Lo S, Cai C, Chen Y, Chung M. Effect of training datasets on support vector machine prediction of protein-protein interactions. Proteomics.2005;5(4):876 – 884.
  16. Dohkan S, Koike A, Takagi T. Improving the Performance of an SVM-Based Method for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions. In. Silico Biol. 2006;6:515–529.
  17. Rashid M, Ramasamy S, PS Raghava G. A simple approach for predicting protein-protein interactions.Curr.Pro.Pept. Sci. 2010;11(7):589–6000.
  18. Kuncheva LI. Combining Pattern Classifiers Methods and Algorithms (Kuncheva LI 2004)[book review]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 2007;18(3):964–964.
  19. Witten I H, Frank E, Hall M A. Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann. 2011.
  20. Najafabadi H S, Salavati R. Sequence-based prediction of protein-protein interactions by means of codon usage. Genome Biol. 2008;9(5):R87.
  21. Liu CH, Li KC, Yuan S. Human protein–protein interaction prediction by a novel sequence-based co-evolution method: co-evolutionary divergence. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):92–98.
  22. Lu L J, Xia Y, Paccanaro A, Yu H, Gerstein M. Assessing the limits of genomic data integration for predicting protein networks. Genome Res. 2005;15(7):945–53.
  23. Jansen R, Yu H, Greenbaum D, Kluger Y, Krogan N, Chung S, Emili A, Snyder M, Greenblatt J, Gerstein M. A Bayesian Networks Approach for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Genomic Data.Science. 2003;302(5644):449 – 453.
  24. Lin X, Chen XW. Heterogeneous data integration by tree-augmented naïve Bayes for protein–protein interactions prediction.Proteomics. 2013;13(2):261–268.
  25. Yang Z R. Machine learning approaches to bioinformatics. World Scientific Publishing Company. 2010;4
  26. K.Srinivas. Clustering Algorithm Combined with Empirical Mode Decomposition for Classification of Remote Sensing Image Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 9, September-2014
  27. K.Srinivas, R.KiranKumar Hyperspectral Image Enhancement Using Evolutionary Algorithm International Journal of Advanced Research (2016), Volume 3, Issue 934-938
  28. B. Sai Chandana, K. Srinivas. Clustering Algorithm Combined with Hill Climbing forClassification of Remote Sensing Image (IJECE)Vol. 4, No. 6, December 2014, pp. 923~930
  29. K. Srinivas Dimensionality Reduction and Classification of Hyperspectral Images using Genetic Algorithm(IJEECS) Vol. 3, No. 3, September 2016
  30. B.Saichandana, K.Srinivas. Hyperspectral Image Classification using Genetic Algorithm after Visualization using Image Fusion (IJCST) Vol. 7, Iss ue 2, April - June 2016.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Volume 3, Issue 3, March-April-2018

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
CH. Bindusri, K. Srinivas, " Dynamic Object Tracking and Occlusion Detection Based on Extended and Advanced Approach, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp.2113-2122, March-April-2018.