Determining Metadata Schema for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

Authors

  • Sarwati Rahayu  Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
  • Ratna Mutu Manikam  Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia

Keywords:

Metadata Schema, Smes, Business Activities

Abstract

Content management system (CMS) is a technology that can be used to support business activity of Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Related works regarding metadata analysis have been done by Yang and Chan (2000), Khazraee (2011), Rasaiah et al. (2015) through different methods. This research will use the approach of domain analysis, system centric analysis and user-centric analysis to complete research entitled metadata for small medium enterprises (SMEs) using user centric analysis. As the result, we found recommendation of metadata element set for SMEs that consists of five main sections, including manufacture, product, seller, costumer and transaction.

References

  1. N Ani, “Peningkatan Daya Saing dan Pangsa Pasar UKM (Usaha Kecil Menengah) Melalui Strategi Penerapan E-Commerce,” J. FIFO, vol. 4, no. 6, 2014.
  2. L Burzagli, M. Billi, F. Gabbanini, P. Graziani, and E. Palchetti, “The use of current content management systems for accessibility,” in ICCHP, 2004, pp. 331-338.
  3. K M. Clair, “Metadata Best Practices in Web Content Management Systems,” J. Libr. Metadata, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 362-371, 2012.
  4. H Noprisson, D. I. Sensuse, Y. G. Sucahyo, and Lukman, “Metadata Development for Ethnophytomedicine Resources Using Metadata Analysis Approach,” in The 2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE 2016), 2016.
  5. D I. Sensuse, H. Noprisson, Y. G. Sucahyo, and L. Lukman, “Metadata Schema for Traditional Knowledge,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 6, 2017.
  6. C C. Yang and W. W. Chan, “Metadata Design for Chinese Medicine Digital Library Using XML,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.
  7. E Khazraee, “Domain Specific Considerations of Metadata for Cultural Heritage,” in International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 2011, pp. 189-191.
  8. B A. Rasaiah, C. Bellman, S. D. Jones, T. J. Malthus, and C. Roelfsema, “Towards an interoperable field spectroscopy metadata standard with extended support for marine specific applications,” Remote Sens., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 15668-15701, 2015.
  9. B Hjørland and J. Hartel, “Afterword: Ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains,” Knowl. Organ., vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 239-245, 2003.
  10. X. Mu, J. Jordan, W. Jeong, and J. Plessis, “Towards a Combined Approach to Metadata in Corporate Knowledge Management: A Case Study of GE Healthcare,” J. Inf. Knowl. Manag., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 189-200, 2009.
  11. J. Greenberg and T. Severiens, “DCMI-Tools: Ontologies for Digital Application Description,” in Openness in Digital Publishing: Awareness, Discovery and Access - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 2007, pp. 437-444.
  12. A. Tzikopoulos, N. Manouselis, C. Yialouris, and A. B. Sideridis, “Using educational metadata in a learning repository that supports lifelong learning needs of rural SMEs,” in Proc. of the 2007 EFITA Conference, 2007, pp. 1-6.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Sarwati Rahayu, Ratna Mutu Manikam, " Determining Metadata Schema for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp.274-279, July-August-2018.