A Concept of Information Technology Investment Evaluation Framework

Authors(2) :-I Gusti Ayu Agung Mas Aristamy, ApolPribadi S.

The need for the current application of Information Technology has led to an increase in corporate spending to invest in Information Technology. The most common issue for companies that want to implement systems and Information Technology is the magnitude of the risks and costs that must be incurred. IT investments have special characteristics, which are high risk, considerable cost, and the perceived benefits are largely intangible. This also applies to companies located in developing countries, especially Indonesia. A common problem that makes IT investment difficult in Indonesia is the imbalance of costs and benefits and the results are very uncertain. The existence of problems related to the difficulty of making IT investment is the reason for the need to evaluate IT investment. The IT investment evaluation is not only limited to knowing whether the investment is feasible or not, but also prioritizing the investment. Information Economics (IE) method is a comprehensive method used to analyze the feasibility of IT investment. However, in Indonesia alone there is no method that can directly prioritize IT investment with the criteria that have been set in accordance with the needs of developing countries. Based on these problems, this study aims to provide a prioritized IT investment framework that will be implemented in one company in Indonesia, which uses components in the IE method as criteria for prioritization. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to weight and compile the IT investment prioritize framework tailored to the needs of companies in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative method and the result of this research is a prioritization hierarchy framework based on IE component. Through the prioritization of IT investment framework, it is expected to improve the accuracy of IT investment decisions to support the company's business processes, especially in Indonesia. It is also expected to answer the problems that occurred during this time related to the unbalanced funds needed and funds issued.

Authors and Affiliations

I Gusti Ayu Agung Mas Aristamy
Department of Information Systems, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
ApolPribadi S.
Department of Information Systems, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia

Information Technology Investment, Feasibility Evaluation, Prioritization, Information Economics.

  1. R E. Indrajit, Analisa Cost-Benefit. 2012.
  2. W Witanti and Falahah, "VAL IT?: Kerangka Kerja Evaluasi Investasi Teknologi Informasi," Semin. Nas. Apl. Teknol. Inf. 2007, vol. 2007, no. SNAIl, pp. 31-37, 2007.
  3. S Sircar, J. L. Turnbow, and B. Bordoloi, "A Framework for Assessing the Relationship between Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance," J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 69-97, 2000.
  4. R D. Banker, H. Chang, and Y. Kao, "Impact of Information Technology on Public Accounting Firm Productivity," J. Inf. Syst., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 209222, 2002.
  5. S M. Allameh, Z. Momeni, Z. S. Esfahani, and M. K. Bardeh, "An assessment of the effect of information communication technology on human resource productivity of Mobarekeh steel complex in Isfahan (IRAN)," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 1321-1326, 2011.
  6. B L. Handoko, R. Aryanto, and I. G. So, "The Impact of Enterprise Resources System and Supply Chain Practices on Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance: Case of Indonesian Companies," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 72, pp. 122-128, 2015.
  7. M Jeffery and I. Leliveld, "Best Practices in IT Portfolio Management," Magazine: Spring 2004 Research Feature, 2004.
  8. E Brynjolfsson, "The productivity of information technology?: review and assessment," Cent. Coord. Sci. Tech. Rep. o30 Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992.
  9. M . Schniederjans, J. . Hamaker, and A. . Schniederjans, Information technology, vol. 18, no. 2-4. 2005.
  10. R. B. Wirawan, L. E. Nugroho, and W. W. Winarno, "Penentuan Prioritas Investasi Bidang Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy-Multi Criteria Decision Making (Studi Kasus Politeknik Caltex Riau)," Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun. 2014, vol. 2014, no. Sentika, pp. 106-115, 2014.
  11. M. M. Parker, "Information Economics: linking business performance to information technology," Journal of Information Technology, vol. 5, no. 1. pp. 55-58, 1990.
  12. P. A. Strassman, The squandered computer: evaluating the business alignment of information technologies. Information Economics Press, 1997.
  13. International Labor Organization (ILO) PARDEV, "ILO Technical Cooperation Manual," p. 315, 2006.
  14. K. Milis and R. Mercken, "The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of Information and Communication Technology projects," Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 87-97, 2004.
  15. Zulkifli, "Implementasi Metode Information Economics ( Ie ) Untuk Menganalisis Manfaat Investasi Sistem," J. Satya Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 65-81, 2016.
  16. H. Hendarti, Evaluasi Investasi Teknologi Informasi. Mitra Wacana Media, 2011.
  17. G. A. Djaja, "Penerapan metodologi information economics untuk mengukur nilai ekonomis implementasi proyek centralized operation perbankan.," Fasilkom Univ. Indones., 1999.
  18. T. J. Renkema, The It Value Quest: How to Capture the Business Value of It-Based Infrastructure. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA ?2000, 2000.
  19. H. Wen and S. C. Shin, "Strategic Information Technology Prioritization," J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 54-64, 2006.
  20. P. Balasubramanian, N. Kulatilaka, and J. Storck, "Managing information technology investment using a real-option approach," J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39-62, 2000.
  21. M. Shakir and D. Viehland, "The selection of the IT platform: Enterprise system implementation in the NZ Health Board," J. Cases Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22-34, 2005.
  22. B. G. Silverman, "Project appraisalmethodology: Amultidimensional R&D benefit/cost assessment tool," Manage. Sci., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 802-824, 1981.
  23. P. M. Maher and A. H. Rubenstein, "Factors affecting adoption of a quantitative method for R&D project selection," Manage. Sci., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 119-129, 1974.
  24. S. L. Schwartz and I. Vertinsky, "Multiattribute investment decision: A study of R&D project selection," Manage. Sci., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 285-301, 1977.
  25. W. Joseph and S. Stephen C, "Strategic Information Technology Planning," J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 2006.
  26. B. Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, D. Budgen, M. Turner, J. Bailey, and S. Linkman, "Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review," Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7-15, 2009.
  27. A. J. P. Sibarani, "Analisis Sistem Informasi Rumah Sakit Menggunakan Metode Information Economics," J. Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 898-906, 2014.
  28. R. Azhario, "Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Computer Based Training Dengan Menggunakan Metode Information Economics Pada Unit Learning And Development (Studi Kasus: PT. Garuda Indonesia, Tbk)," Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2016.
  32. A. Shahin and M. A. Mahbod, "Prioritization of key performance indicators," Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 226-240, 2007.
  33. E. W. T. Ngai and E. W. C. Chan, "Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 889-899, 2005.
  34. J. Sarkis and S. Talluri, "Evaluating and selecting e-commerce software and communication systems for a supply chain," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 159, no. 2 SPEC. ISS., pp. 318-329, 2004.
  35. Z. Ayag and R. G. Ozdemir, "An intelligent approach to ERP software selection through fuzzy ANP," Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2169-2194, 2007.
  36. L. Abdullah and L. Najib, "A new preference scale of intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision making problems," J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1039-1049, 2014.
  37. I. Dragovic, N. Turajlic, D. Radojevic, and B. Petrovic, "Combining boolean consistent fuzzy logic and ahp illustrated on the web service selection problem," Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., vol. 7, no. SUPPL.1, pp. 84-93, 2014.
  38. A. H. I. Lee, W.-C. Chen, and C.-J. Chang, "A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 96-107, 2008.
  39. S. H. Zyoud, L. G. Kaufmann, H. Shaheen, S. Samhan, and D. Fuchs-Hanusch, "A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 61, pp. 86-105, 2016.
  40. A. Alami, "Why Do Information Technology Projects Fail?," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 100, pp. 62-71, 2016.
  41. A. Mohamad, Y. Zainuddin, N. Alam, and G. Kendall, "Does decentralized decision making increase company performance through its Information Technology infrastructure investment?," Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. September 2016, pp. 1-15, 2017.
  42. A. M. Pitangueira, R. S. P. Maciel, and M. Barros, "approaches?: A systematic review and mapping of the literature," J. Syst. Softw., 2014.
  43. R. Oktavera and R. Saraswati, "Framework for Implementation Project Portfolio," vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 163-174, 2012.
  44. J. W. Lee and S. H. Kim, "Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection," Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 367-382, 2000.
  45. C. Mao, Q. Mei, and Z. Ma, "A New Method for Information System Selection," 2009 Second Int. Conf. Futur. Inf. Technol. Manag. Eng., pp. 65-68, 2009.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 3 | Issue 6 | July-August 2018
Date of Publication : 2018-07-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 159-174
Manuscript Number : CSEIT183619
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-3307

Cite This Article :

I Gusti Ayu Agung Mas Aristamy, ApolPribadi S., "A Concept of Information Technology Investment Evaluation Framework", International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp.159-174, July-August-2018.
Journal URL : http://ijsrcseit.com/CSEIT183619

Article Preview