Spam Recognition in Social Media Based on Reviews

Authors

  • S. Reddy Rajesh  Department of MCA, Mother Theresa Institute of Computer Applications, Palamaner, India
  • P. Prasad Babu  Department of MCA, Mother Theresa Institute of Computer Applications, Palamaner, India

Keywords:

Net spam, reviews, feedback

Abstract

Nowadays, an enormous a part of individuals think about offered content in social media in their choices (e.g. reviews and feedback on a subject or product). the chance that anybody will leave a review provides a golden chance for spammers to write down spam reviews regarding product and services for various interests. distinguishing these spammers and therefore the spam content could be a hot topic of analysis and though a substantial variety of studies are done recently toward this finish, however to date the methodologies place forth still barely notice spam reviews, and none of them show the importance of every extracted feature sort. during this study, we have a tendency to propose a completely unique framework, named NetSpam, that utilizes spam options for modeling review datasets as heterogeneous data networks to map spam detection procedure into a classification drawback in such networks. victimization the importance of spam options facilitate us to get higher leads to terms of various metrics experimented on real-world review datasets from Yelp and Amazon websites. The results show that NetSpam outperforms the present ways and among four classes of options together with review-behavioral, user-behavioral, review linguistic, user-linguistic, the primary sort of options performs higher than the opposite classes.

References

  1. J. Donfro, A whopping 20 % of yelp reviews are fake. http://www.businessinsider.com/20-percent-of-yelp-reviews-fake-2013-9. Accessed: 2015-07-30.
  2. M. Ott, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock. Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities. In ACM WWW, 2012.
  3. M. Ott, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock. Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination.In ACL, 2011.
  4. Ch. Xu and J. Zhang. Combating product review spam campaigns via multiple heterogeneous pairwise features. In SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2014.
  5. N. Jindal and B. Liu. Opinion spam and analysis. In WSDM, 2008.
  6. F. Li, M. Huang, Y. Yang, and X. Zhu. Learning to identify review spam. Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; IJCAI, 2011.
  7. G. Fei, A. Mukherjee, B. Liu, M. Hsu, M. Castellanos, and R. Ghosh. Exploiting burstiness in reviews for review spammer detection. In ICWSM, 2013.
  8. A. j. Minnich, N. Chavoshi, A. Mueen, S. Luan, and M. Faloutsos. Trueview: Harnessing the power of multiple review sites. In ACM WWW, 2015.
  9. B. Viswanath, M. Ahmad Bashir, M. Crovella, S. Guah, K. P. Gummadi, B. Krishnamurthy, and A. Mislove. Towards detecting anomalous user behavior in online social networks. In USENIX, 2014.
  10. H. Li, Z. Chen, B. Liu, X. Wei, and J. Shao. Spotting fake reviews via collective PU learning. In ICDM, 2014.
  11. L. Akoglu, R. Chandy, and C. Faloutsos. Opinion fraud detection in online reviews bynetwork effects. In ICWSM, 2013.
  12. R. Shebuti and L. Akoglu. Collective opinion spam detection: bridging review networksand metadata. In ACM KDD, 2015.
  13. S. Feng, R. Banerjee and Y. Choi. Syntactic stylometry for deception detection. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers; ACL, 2012.
  14. N. Jindal, B. Liu, and E.-P. Lim. Finding unusual review patterns using unexpected rules. In ACM CIKM, 2012.
  15. E.-P. Lim, V.-A. Nguyen, N. Jindal, B. Liu, and H. W. Lauw. Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In ACM CIKM, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
S. Reddy Rajesh, P. Prasad Babu, " Spam Recognition in Social Media Based on Reviews, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp.448-451, March-April-2018.