Social Marketplace Monitoring and Sentiment Analysis

Authors

  • P. Monisha  BE Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IFET College Of Engineering, Villupuram, India
  • R. Rubanya  BE Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IFET College Of Engineering, Villupuram, India
  • N. Malarvizhi  Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram, India

Keywords:

Intrinsic-Domain Relevancy, Extrinsic-Domain Relevance, Natural Language Processing,Domain Relevance

Abstract

The overwhelming majority of existing approaches to opinion feature extraction trust mining patterns for one review corpus, ignoring the nontrivial disparities in word spacing characteristics of opinion options across completely different corpora. During this research a unique technique to spot opinion options from on-line reviews by exploiting the distinction in opinion feature statistics across two corpora, one domain-specific corpus (i.e., the given review corpus) and one domain-independent corpus (i.e., the contrasting corpus). The tendency to capture this inequality called domain relevance (DR), characterizes the relevancy of a term to a text assortment. The tendency to extract an inventory of candidate opinion options from the domain review corpus by shaping a group of grammar dependence rules. for every extracted candidate feature, to have a tendency to estimate its intrinsic-domain relevancy (IDR) and extrinsic-domain relevance(EDR) scores on the domain-dependent and domain-independent corpora, severally. Natural language processing (NLP) refers to computer systems that analyze, attempt understand, or produce one or more human languages, such as English, Japanese, Italian, or Russian. Process information contained in natural language text. The input might be text, spoken language, or keyboard input. The field of NLP is primarily concerned with getting computers to perform useful and interesting tasks with human languages. The field of NLP is secondarily concerned with helping us come to a better understanding of human language

References

  1. B. Liu, “Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining,” Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-167, May 2012.
  2. W. Jin and H.H. Ho, “A Novel Lexicalized HMM-Based Learning Framework for Web Opinion Mining,” Proc. 26th Ann. Int’l Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 465-472, 2009.
  3. N. Jakob and I. Gurevych, “Extracting Opinion Targets in a Singleand Cross-Domain Setting with Conditional Random Fields,” Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1035-1045, 2010.
  4. S.-M. Kim and E. Hovy, “Extracting Opinions, Opinion Holders, and Topics Expressed in Online News Media Text,” Proc. ACL/COLING Workshop Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, 2006.
  5. G. Qiu, C. Wang, J. Bu, K. Liu, and C. Chen, “Incorporate the Syntactic Knowledge in Opinion Mining in User-Generated Content,” Proc. WWW 2008 Workshop NLP Challenges in the Information Explosion Era, 2008.
  6. G. Qiu, B. Liu, J. Bu, and C. Chen, “Opinion Word Expansion and Target Extraction through Double Propagation,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 37, pp. 9-27, 2011.
  7. D.M. Blei, A.Y. Ng, and M.I. Jordan, “Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” J. Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, pp. 993-1022, Mar. 2003.
  8. I. Titov and R. McDonald, “Modeling Online Reviews with Multi- Grain Topic Models,” Proc. 17th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 111-120, 2008.
  9. Y. Jo and A.H. Oh, “Aspect and Sentiment Unification Model for Online Review Analysis,” Proc. Fourth ACM Int’l Conf. Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 815-824, 2011.
  10. M. Hu and B. Liu, “Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews,” Proc. 10th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 168-177, 2004.
  11. A. Popescu and O. Etzioni, “Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews,” Proc. Human Language Technology Conf. and Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 339-346, 2005.
  12. V. Hatzivassiloglou and J.M. Wiebe, “Effects of Adjective Orientation and Gradability on Sentence Subjectivity,” Proc. 18th Conf. Computational Linguistics, pp. 299-305, 2000.
  13. B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan, “Thumbs up?: Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques,” Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 79-86, 2002.
  14. B. Pang and L. Lee, “A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts,” Proc. 42nd Ann. Meeting on Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, 2004.
  15. R. Mcdonald, K. Hannan, T. Neylon, M. Wells, and J. Reynar, “Structured Models for Fine-to-Coarse Sentiment Analysis,” Proc. 45th Ann. Meeting of the Assoc. of Computational Linguistics, pp. 432-439, 2007.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June-2019

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
P. Monisha, R. Rubanya, N. Malarvizhi, " Social Marketplace Monitoring and Sentiment Analysis, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp.127-133, May-June-2019.