Distinguishing two Different Mental States with Application of Non-Linear Parameters

Authors

  • Bambam Kumar Choudhary  Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IES College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Prof. Anshul Sarawagi  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IES College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT1952208

Keywords:

Brain Computer Interface, Response to Mental Tasks, Feature Extraction, Empirical Mode Decomposition, Electroencephalograph.

Abstract

Electroencephalograph (EEG) is useful modality nowadays which is utilized to capture cognitive activities in the form of a signal representing the potential for a given period. Brain Computer Interface (BCI) systems are one of the practical application of EEG signal. Response to mental task is a well-known type of BCI systems which augments the life of disabled persons to communicate their core needs to machines that can able to distinguish among mental states corresponding to thought responses to the EEG. The success of classification of these mental tasks depends on the pertinent set formation of features (analysis, extraction and selection) of the EEG signals for the classification process. In the recent past, a filter based heuristic technique, Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), is employed to analyse EEG signal. EMD is a mathematical technique which is suitable to analyze a non-stationary and non-linear signal such as EEG. In this work, three stage feature set formation from EEG signal for building classification model is suggested to distinguish different mental states. In the first stage, the signal is broken into a number of oscillatory functions through EMD algorithm. The second stage involves compact representation in terms of four different features obtained from the each oscillatory function. It has also observed that not all features are relevant therefore there is need to select most relevant features from the pool of the formed features which is carried out in the third stage. Two well-known multi-variate feature selection algorithms are investigated in combination with EMD algorithm for forming the feature vectors for further classification. Classification is carried out with help of learning the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification model. Experimental result on a publicly available dataset shows the superior performance of the proposed approach

References

  1. Charles W Anderson, Erik A Stolz, and Sanyogita Shamsunder. Multivariate autoregressive models for classification of spontaneous electroencephalographic signals during mental tasks. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 45(3):277-286, 1998.
  2. F Babiloni, F Cincotti, L Lazzarini, J Millan, J Mourino, M Varsta, J Heikkonen, L Bianchi, and MG Marciani. Linear classification of low-resolution eeg patterns produced by imagined hand movements. Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 8(2):186-188, 2000.
  3. Ali Bashashati, Mehrdad Fatourechi, Rabab K Ward, and Gary E Birch. A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals. Journal of Neural engineering, 4(2):R32, 2007.
  4. Daniel O Cajueiro and Benjamin M Tabak. The hurst exponent over time: testing the assertion that emerging markets are becoming more efficient. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 336(3):521-537, 2004.
  5. Pablo F Diez, Abel Torres, Enrique Avila, Eric Laciar, and Vicente Mut. Classification of mental tasks using different spectral estimation methods. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2009.
  6. Farhad Faradji, Rabab K Ward, and Gary E Birch. Plausibility assessment of a 2-state self-paced mental task-based bci using the no-control performance analysis. Journal of neuroscience methods, 180(2):330-339, 2009.
  7. Akshansh Gupta, RK Agrawal, and Baljeet Kaur. Performance enhancement of mental task classification using eeg signal: a study of multivariate feature selection methods. Soft Computing, 19(10):2799-2812, 2015.
  8. Isabelle Guyon and André Elisseeff. An introduction to variable and feature selection. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1157-1182, 2003.
  9. Norden E Huang, Zheng Shen, Steven R Long, Manli C Wu, Hsing H Shih, Quanan Zheng, Nai-Chyuan Yen, Chi Chao Tung, and Henry H Liu. The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 454(1971):903-995, 1998.
  10. Harold Edwin Hurst. Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng., 116:770-799, 1951.
  11. Leonidas D Iasemidis, J Chris Sackellares, Hitten P Zaveri, and William J Williams. Phase space topography and the lyapunov exponent of electrocorticograms in partial seizures. Brain topography, 2(3):187-201, 1990.
  12. Laura Kauhanen, Tommi Nykopp, Janne Lehtonen, P Jylanki, Jukka Heikkonen, Pekka Rantanen, Hannu Alaranta, and Mikko Sams. Eeg and meg brain-computer interface for tetraplegic patients. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 14(2):190-193, 2006.
  13. Zachary A Keirn and Jorge I Aunon. A new mode of communication between man and his surroundings. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 37(12):1209-1214, 1990.
  14. Ron Kohavi and George H John. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial intelligence, 97(1):273-324, 1997.
  15. Abraham Lempel and Jacob Ziv. On the complexity of finite sequences. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 22(1):75-81, 1976.
  16. Gert Pfurtscheller, Christa Neuper, Alois Schlogl, and Klaus Lugger. Separability of eeg signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters. Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 6(3):316-325, 1998.
  17. Steven M Pincus. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88(6):2297-2301, 1991.
  18. Vasiliki Plerou, Parameswaran Gopikrishnan, Bernd Rosenow, Luis AN Amaral, and H Eugene Stanley. Econophysics: financial time series from a statistical physics point of view. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 279(1):443-456, 2000.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Bambam Kumar Choudhary, Prof. Anshul Sarawagi, " Distinguishing two Different Mental States with Application of Non-Linear Parameters, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp.811-817, March-April-2019. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT1952208