A Contextual Analysis and Challenges Between Agile and Non-Agile Teams in Working Environment

Authors

  • Vedavyas J  H&S Department, BITM, Karnataka, India
  • Ashwini D  Science Department, DWS, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT1952209

Keywords:

Agile Development Processes, Large Organizations, Work Motivation, Empirical Study

Abstract

There are thinks about demonstrating what occurs if coordinated groups are brought into a non-light-footed association, for example higher overhead expenses and the need of a comprehension of deft techniques even outside the groups. This contextual analysis demonstrates a case of work inspirational perspectives that may surface when a dexterous group exists amidst a progressively conventional structure. This contextual investigation was directed at a vehicle producer in Sweden, comprising of an unstructured meeting with the Scrum Master and a semi-organized center gathering. The outcomes demonstrate that the groups felt that the criticism from the encompassing association was unsynchronized bringing about them not feeling acknowledged while conveying their work. Besides, they felt baffled when dealing with non-dexterous groups after have been taking a shot at coordinated ones. This investigation reasons that there were work inspirational effects of fitting a nimble group into a non-spry encompassing association, and in this way this may likewise be valid for different associations.

References

  1. M. Engwall, "The futile dream of the perfect goal," Beyond project management, vol. 1, pp. 261–277, 2002.
  2. D. Fernandez and J. Fernandez, "Agile project management–Agilism versus traditional approaches," Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 10–17, 2008.
  3. E. Goldratt, Critical chain. Great Barrington: North River Press, 1997.
  4. W. Feld, Lean manufacturing: Tools, techniques, and how to use them. Boca Raton, Fla.: St. Lucie Press, 2001.
  5. M. Laanti, O. Salo, and P. Abrahamsson, "Agile methods rapidly replacing traditional methods at Nokia: A survey of opinions on agile transformation," Information and Software Technology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 276–290, 2011.
  6. G. Melnik and F. Maurer, "Comparative analysis of job satisfaction in agile and non-agile software development teams," in Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering. Springer, 2006, pp. 32–42.
  7. R. Turner, The handbook of project-based management: improving the processes for achieving strategic objectives, 2nd ed. London: McGrawHill, 1999.
  8. A. Babu and N. Suresh, "Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 320–327, 1996.
  9. D. Khang and Y. Myint, "Time, cost and quality trade-off in project management: a case study," International journal of project management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 249–256, 1999.
  10. o.Granstrand, Industrial innovation economics and intellectual property, 5th ed. Goteborg: Svenska kulturkompaniet, 2010.¨
  11. J. Berk and P. DeMarzo, Corporate finance, 2nd ed. Harlow, Essex: Pearson, 2011.
  12. T. Copeland, F. Weston, and K. Shastri, Financial theory and corporate policy, 4th ed. Boston, Mass.: Pearson Addison-Wesley, 2005.
  13. H. Maylor, Project management, 4th ed. Harlow, England: Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2010.
  14. R. Cooper, "Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products," Business Horizons, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 44–54, 1990.
  15. H. Hartley and A. Wortham, "A statistical theory for pert critical path analysis," Management Science, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. B–469, 1966.
  16. M. Fowler and J. Highsmith, "The agile manifesto," In Software Development, Issue on Agile Methodologies, last accessed on December 29th, 2006, Aug. 2001.
  17. N. Moe, A. Aurum, and T. Dyba, "Challenges of shared decision-˚ making: A multiple case study of agile software development," Information and Software Technology, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 853–865, 2012.
  18. A. Roth, "Achieving strategic agility through economies of knowledge," Strategy & leadership, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 30–36, 1996.
  19. K. Schwaber, Agile project management with Scrum. Redmond, Wash.: Microsoft Press, 2004.
  20. G. Chin, Agile project management: how to succeed in the face of changing project requirements. New York: AMACOM, 2004.
  21. B. Boehm and R. Turner, "Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations," Software, IEEE, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 30–39, 2005.
  22. S. Jalali and C. Wohlin, "Agile practices in global software engineering– a systematic map," in International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE). IEEE, 2010.
  23. K. Korhonen, "Adopting agile practices in teams with no direct programming responsibility–A case study," Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pp. 30–43, 2011.
  24. D. Karlstrom and P. Runeson, "Combining agile methods with stage-¨ gate project management," Software, IEEE, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 43–49, 2005.
  25. K. Petersen and C. Wohlin, "The effect of moving from a plan-driven to an incremental software development approach with agile practices," Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 654–693, 2010.
  26. "A comparison of issues and advantages in agile and incremental development between state of the art and an industrial case," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 1479–1490, 2009.
  27. D. West et al., "Water-scrum-fall is the reality of agile for most organizations today," Forrester Research, July, vol. 26, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Vedavyas J, Ashwini D, " A Contextual Analysis and Challenges Between Agile and Non-Agile Teams in Working Environment, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp.704-711, March-April-2019. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT1952209