A Comparative Study on Load-Frequency Controllers of a Five-Area Interconnected Power System

Authors

  • Dao Thi Mai Phuong  Department of Electrical Engineering Technology, Hanoi University of Industry, Hanoi, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT1952271

Keywords:

LFC, Five-Area Interconnected Power System, Conventional Regulator, Intelligent Controller, FL

Abstract

The crucial objectives of load-frequency control (LFC) to a multi-area interconnected power system are to maintain the system frequency at a nominal value (50 Hz or 60 Hz) and the tie-line power flows at predetermined values. Based on tie-line bias control strategy, conventional regulators, such as I, PI and PID, were initially used for solving the LFC problem. Due to the complexity, nonlinearity and uncertainty of a multi-area power system in practice, the conventional regulators may not obtain the control performances good enough to bring the network back to the steady state as soon as possible. Meanwhile, intelligent controllers, such as fuzzy logic (FL)-based controllers, are able to completely replace these conventional counterparts. The superiority of the FL-based LFC controllers over the conventional ones for a typical case study of five-area interconnected power grids is validated in this paper through numerical simulations implemented in Matlab/Simulink package. It should be apparent from this comparative study that the LFC controller based on FL technique is a feasible selection in dealing with the LFC problem of a multi-area power network.

References

  1. Leonard L. Grigsby. Power system stability and control. 3rd edition, CRC Press, 2016.
  2. Jizhong Zhu. Optimization of power system operation. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  3. A. Moeini and I. Kamwa. Analytical Concepts for Reactive Power Based Primary Frequency Control in Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 4217-4230, Nov. 2016.
  4. Patricia Melin, Oscar Castillo, Janusz Kacprzyk, Marek Reformat, William Melek. Fuzzy logic in intelligent system design: Theory and applications. Springer, 2017.
  5. K. Vinoth Kumar. Neural networks and FL. S. K. Kataria & Sons, 2009.
  6. J. Liu, Q. Yao, Y. Hu. Model predictive control for load frequency of hybrid power system with wind power and thermal power, Energy, Vol. 172, 2019, pp. 555-565.
  7. S. Hamid Shahalami, D. Farsi. Analysis of Load Frequency Control in a restructured multi-area power system with the Kalman filter and the LQR controller, AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, Vol. 86, 2018, pp. 25-46.
  8. C. Zhao, U. Topcu, N. Li and S. Low. Design and Stability of Load-Side Primary Frequency Control in Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1177-1189, May 2014.
  9. Ş. Sönmez, S. Ayasun and C. O. Nwankpa. An Exact Method for Computing Delay Margin for Stability of Load Frequency Control Systems with Constant Communication Delays, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 370-377, Jan. 2016.
  10. Mohamed M. Ismail, Ahmed F. Bendary, Load Frequency Control for Multi Area Smart Grid based on Advanced Control Techniques, Alexandria Engineering Journal, Volume 57, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 4021-4032.
  11. H. Yousef. Adaptive fuzzy logic load frequency control of multi-area power system, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 68, 2015, pp. 384-395.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Dao Thi Mai Phuong, " A Comparative Study on Load-Frequency Controllers of a Five-Area Interconnected Power System, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp.1019-1025, March-April-2019. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT1952271