The Performance Comparison of Software as a Service for the First Step Cloud Computing Adoption Processes

Authors

  • Dimas Sasongko  Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia
  • Setiya Nugroho  Department of Informatics Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT195457

Keywords:

Cloud Computing, Cloud Computing Adoption, SaaS, Office 365, Google Apps

Abstract

The initial stage of the adoption process for the implementation of cloud computing technology in an institution is evaluating to select the cloud provider. This research will discuss the comparison of the performance of Software as a Service (SaaS) owned by each cloud provider. In this research, cloud providers were selected based on the previous research about the ready-to-use SaaS services for users, namely Microsoft Office 365 and Google Apps. Testing the comparison of SaaS performance is needed to provide solutions to institutions in determining the use of SaaS applications. The benchmarking method is used to find the performance comparison between SaaS application. This research conducted with four main phases; they are choosing a cloud provider and SaaS, selecting attributes for testing SaaS performance, selecting a SaaS performance testing scenario, and performing performance testing based on the testing scenario. From the results, we infer that Gmail, Google Drive, and Google has responsive web page performance and can be loaded correctly on devices with limited memory.

References

  1. M. Armbrust et al., “A View of Cloud Computing," Commun. ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 50-58, Apr. 2010.
  2. W. Luna and J. L. C. Sequera, “Collaboration in the cloud for online learning environments: an experience applied to laboratories," Creative Education, vol. 6, no. 13, p. 1435, 2015.
  3. V. Patel and T. Bhatt, “Survey on Cloud based Collaboration System," International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 2, no. 6, 2017.
  4. P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST definition of cloud computing" 2011.
  5. R. F. El-Gazzar, “A literature review on cloud computing adoption issues in enterprises," presented at the International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT, 2014, pp. 214-242.
  6. R. Ferdiana, “The comparison of consumer cloud storage for a storage extension on the e-learning," in Engineering Seminar (InAES), International Annual, 2016, pp. 182-186.
  7. R. Bernsteiner and R. Pecina, “Cloud Based Office Suites-Users' Attitudes Towards Productivity, Usability, and Security," in International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, 2015, pp. 389-403.
  8. B. G. Lyons and T. Parker, “Office 365: tips to avoid turbulence while moving faculty and staff to the cloud," presented at the Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services, 2013, pp. 131-136.
  9. Y. Wang and B. Jin, “The application of SaaS model in network education-take google apps, for example," presented at the 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, 2010, vol. 4, pp. V4-191.
  10. M. A. Embi, “e-Learning in Malaysian higher education institutions: Status, trends, & challenges," Department of Higher Education Ministry of Higher Education, 2011.
  11. G. Laura, O. Bogdan, C. Aurelia, and M. Serban, “University Learning Management System based on Office 365," presented at the 2018 17th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 2018, pp. 1-6.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Dimas Sasongko, Setiya Nugroho, " The Performance Comparison of Software as a Service for the First Step Cloud Computing Adoption Processes , IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp.85-91, September-October-2019. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT195457