A Survey on Secure Data Sharing and Identity Based Encryption in Cloud Computing

Authors

  • Vaishnavi B. Shinde  M. Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, V. M. Institute of Engineering and Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Prof. Minakshi Ramteke  Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, V. M. Institute of Engineering and Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Prof. Gurudev Sawarkar  Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, V. M. Institute of Engineering and Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Identity-based encryption (IBE), revocation, outsourcing, cloud computing, PKG

Abstract

Public key infrastructure (PKI) is a substitute other option to open key encryption whereas the Identity-Based Encryption IBE is open key and confirmation organization. The standard disadvantage of IBE in the midst of revocation is the overhead estimation at private key generator (PKG).In this paper, going for survey on unmistakable methodology for dealing with the basic issue of Identity dissent. We similarly discussed our proposed work which bring outsourcing calculation into IBE inquisitively and propose a revocable IBE organize in the server-helped setting. Our game plan offloads a limitless piece of the key time frame related operations amidst key-issuing and key-upgrade structures to a Key Update Cloud Service Provider, leaving just a dependable number of basic operations for PKG and clients to perform locally. What's more, we propose another progression which is provable secure under the beginning late formulized Refereed giving over of Computation model.

References

  1. W. Aiello, S. Oldham, and R. Ostrovsky, “Fast digital identity revocation, “in Advances in Cryptology (CRYPTO‟98). New York, NY, USA: Springer, 1998, pp. 137–152.
  2. Boneh and M. Franklin, “Identity-based encryption from the Weil pairing,” in Advances in Cryptology (CRYPTO „01), J. Kilian, Ed.Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2001, vol. 2139, pp. 213–229.
  3. Sahai and B. Waters, “Fuzzy identity-based encryption,” in Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT‟05), R. Cramer, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005, vol. 3494, pp. 557–557.
  4. S. Hohenberger and A. Lysyanskaya, “How to securely outsource cryptographic computations,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Theory Cryptography (TCC‟05), 2005, pp. 264– 282
  5. J. Li, C. Jia, J. Li, and X. Chen, “Outsourcing encryption of attributebased encryption with mapreduce,” in Information and Communications Security. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, vol. 7618, pp. 191–201.
  6. Zhang, J. Wang, K. Ren, and C. Wang, “Privacy assured Trans. Emerging Topics Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 166–177, Jul. Dec. 2013 outsourcing of image reconstruction service in cloud,” IEEE.
  7. Zhang, J. Wang, K. Ren, and C. Wang, “Privacyassured outsourcing of image reconstruction service in cloud,” IEEE Trans. Emerging Topics Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 166–177, Jul./Dec. 2013.
  8. Shamir, “Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes,” in Advances in Cryptology (CRYPTO), G. Blakley and D. Chaum, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1985, vol. 196, pp. 47–53.
  9. Cocks, “An identity based encryption scheme based on quadratic residues,” in Cryptography and Coding, B. Honary, Ed. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer, 2001, vol. 2260, pp. 360–363.
  10. R. Canetti, S. Halevi, and J. Katz, “A forward-secure public-key encryption scheme,” in Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT‟03),E. Biham, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2003, vol. 2656, pp. 646–646.
  11. Boneh and X. Boyen, “Efficient selective-id secure identity-based encryption without random oracles,” in Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT‟04), C. Cachin and J. Camenisch, Eds. Berlin,Germany: Springer, 2004, vol. 3027, pp. 223–238.
  12. Boneh and X. Boyen, “Secure identity based encryption without random oracles,” in Advances in Cryptology (CRYPTO‟04),M. Franklin, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2004, vol. 3152, pp. 197–206.
  13. B. Waters, “Efficient identity-based encryption without random oracles,” in Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT‟05), R. Cramer, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005, vol. 3494, pp. 114–127.
  14. C. Gentry, “Practical identity-based encryption without random oracles,” in Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT‟06), S. Vaudenay, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006, vol. 4004, pp. 445–464.
  15. C. Gentry, C. Peikert, and V. Vaikuntanathan, “Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions,” in Proc. 40th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput. (STOC‟08), 2008, pp. 197–206.
  16. S. Agrawal, D. Boneh, and X. Boyen, “Efficient lattice (h)ibe in the standard model,” in Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT‟10), H. Gilbert, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010, vol. 6110, pp. 553–572.
  17. D. Cash, D. Hofheinz, E. Kiltz, and C. Peikert, “Bonsai trees, or how to delegate a lattice basis,” in Advances in Cryptology (EUROCRYPT‟10), H. Gilbert, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010,vol. 6110, pp. 523–552
  18. Y. Hanaoka, G. Hanaoka, J. Shikata, and H. Imai, “Identity-based hierarchical strongly key-insulated encryption and its application,” in Advances in Cryptology (ASIACRYPT‟05), B. Roy, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005, vol. 3788, pp. 495–514.
  19. D. Boneh, X. Ding, G. Tsudik, and C. Wong, “A method for fast revocation of public key certificates and security capabilities,” in Proc. 10th USENIX Security Symp., 2001, pp. 297–308.
  20. B. Libert and J.-J. Quisquater, “Efficient revocation and threshold pairing based cryptosystems,” in Proc. 22nd Annu. Symp. Principles Distrib. Comput., 2003, pp. 163–171.
  21. H. Lin, Z. Cao, Y. Fang, M. Zhou, and H. Zhu, “Howto design space efficient revocable IBE from nonmonotonic ABE,” in Proc. 6th ACM Symp. Inf. Comput. Commun. Security (ASIACCS‟11), 2011, pp. 381–385.
  22. B. Libert and D. Vergnaud, “Adaptive-id secure revocable identitybased encryption,” in Topics in Cryptology (CT-RSA‟09),M. Fischlin, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2009, vol. 5473, pp. 1–15.
  23. S. Yu, C. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou, “Attribute based data sharing with attribute revocation,” in Proc. 5th ACM Symp. Inf. Comput. Commun. Security (ASIACCS‟10), 2010, pp. 261–270.
  24. D. Chaum and T. P. Pedersen, “Wallet databases with observers,” in Proc. 12th Annu. Int. Cryptology Conf. Adv. Cryptology (CRYPTO‟92), 1993, pp. 89–105.
  25. M. J. Atallah, K. Pantazopoulos, J. R. Rice, and E. E. Spafford, “Secure outsourcing of scientific computations,” in Trends in Software Engineering, M. V. Zelkowitz, Ed. New York, NY, USA: Elsevier, 2002,vol. 54, pp. 215–272

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 6, November-December-2019

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Vaishnavi B. Shinde, Prof. Minakshi Ramteke, Prof. Gurudev Sawarkar, " A Survey on Secure Data Sharing and Identity Based Encryption in Cloud Computing, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp.378-384, November-December-2019.