Influence of Transformational Leadership on Work Engagement and Employee Performance

Authors

  • Benedicta Akey-Torku  School of Management, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, P.R. China
  • Baozhen Dai  School of Management, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, P.R. China

DOI:

https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT20616

Keywords:

Employment, Job Satisfaction, KMO Sampling Adequacy, Inspirational, Motivation, Factor Model

Abstract

The effect of different factors on the relationship between work engagement and commitment on one hand and performance on the other is already established in the extant literature While a multiplicity of studies have identified differences in the moderating effect of experience level, gender, age on work engagement, commitment and performance is barely explored in the current literature even though with greater certainty. The objective of this research is to examine the influence of transformational leadership attributes on the employees’ work engagement. The results of the analysis earlier presented means that both hypotheses must be accepted. The study found out that while intellectual stimulation affects employees’ performance, the effect of idealised influence on employees’ work performance is significantly higher. The results affirm the long held notion that encouraging innovative thinking is an important factor that contributes to employee performance and vice versa.

References

  1. Adair, John (2016). Leadership and motivation: the fifty-fifty rule and the eight key principles of motivating others. Kogan Page Publishers: Philedelphia, USA & London, UK.
  2. Adame-Sánchez, C., González-Cruz, T. F., & Martínez-Fuentes, C. (2016). Do firms implement work–life balance policies to benefit their workers or themselves?. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5519-5523.
  3. Aga, D. A., Noorderhaven, N., & Vallejo, B. (2016). Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 806-818.
  4. Aldag, R. J. & Kuzuhara, L. W. (2016). Organizational behavior and management: an integrated skills approach. South-Western: Thomson Learning.
  5. Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2016). Intellectual failure and ideological success in organization studies: The case of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(2), 139-152.
  6. Ariely, Dan, Bracha, Anat and Meier, Stephan (2016). Doing good or Doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2968; FRB of Boston Working Paper No. 07-9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010620
  7. Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Kuchinke, K. P. (2016). Impact of leadership styles on employees’ attitude towards their leader and performance: Empirical evidence from Pakistani banks. Future Business Journal, 2(1), 54-64.
  8. B´enabou, Ronald and Tirole, Jean (2016), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, PP: 489-520.
  9. Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2016). A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 634-652.
  10. Barbuto Jr., John E., Trout, Shirley K. and Brown, Lance L. (2016), Identifying sources of motivation of adult rural workers. Journal of Agricultural Education, Vol. 45 (3), PP: 10-21.
  11. Batt, R., & Valcour, P. M. (2013). Human resources practices as predictors of work‐family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 189-220.
  12. Baumert, Jurgen and Demmrich, Anke (2015). Test motivation in the assessment of student skills: The effects of incentives on motivation and performance, European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 16(3), PP: 441-462.
  13. Beauregard, T. A. (2014). Fairness perceptions of work− life balance initiatives: Effects on counterproductive work behaviour. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 772-789.
  14. Becker, Howard S., The epistemology of qualitative research. University of Chicago Press, 2014. 53-71. [from Ethnography and human development : context and meaning in social inquiry / edited by Richard Jessor, Anne Colby, and Richard A. Shweder] OCLC 46597302
  15. Bloom, P. (2016). Work as the contemporary limit of life: Capitalism, the death drive, and the lethal fantasy of ‘work–life balance’. Organization, 23(4), 588-606.
  16. Borah, N., & Bagla, N. (2016). Work-Life Balance: Assessing Perceptions. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 13(3).
  17. Bosch, C., & Rexroth, M. (2014). Mindfulness as a cognitive–emotional segmentation strategy: An intervention promoting work–life balance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 733-754.
  18. Bouget, D., Spasova, S., & Vanhercke, B. (2016). Work-life balance measures for persons of working age with dependent relatives in Europe. A study of national policies.
  19. Braun, S., & Peus, C. (2016). Crossover of Work–Life Balance Perceptions: Does Authentic Leadership Matter?. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-19.
  20. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 87(1), 138-157.
  21. Brewer, C. S., Kovner, C. T., Djukic, M., Fatehi, F., Greene, W., Chacko, T. P., & Yang, Y. (2016). Impact of transformational leadership on nurse work outcomes. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(11), 2879-2893.
  22. Brewer, C. S., Kovner, C. T., Djukic, M., Fatehi, F., Greene, W., Chacko, T. P., & Yang, Y. (2016). Impact of transformational leadership on nurse work outcomes. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(11), 2879-2893.
  23. Brewer, C. S., Kovner, C. T., Djukic, M., Fatehi, F., Greene, W., Chacko, T. P., & Yang, Y. (2016). Impact of transformational leadership on nurse work outcomes. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(11), 2879-2893.
  24. Browning, H. W., Torain, D. J., & Patterson, T. E. (2016). Collaborative healthcare leadership: A six-part model for adapting and thriving during a time of transformative change. Center for Creative Leadership White Papers.
  25. Buchheit, S., Dalton, D. W., Harp, N. L., & Hollingsworth, C. W. (2015). A contemporary analysis of accounting professionals' work-life balance. Accounting Horizons, 30(1), 41-62.
  26. Buhler, P. M. (2016). Managing in the new millennium: 21st century organizations: Everyone doing more with less. Supervision. Retrieved 14th July 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5020/is_/ai_n18217632
  27. Cameron, Judy, Banko, Katherine M. and Pierce, W. David (2015). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues, The Behavior Analyst, Vol. 24(1), PP: 1–44.
  28. Cannizzo, F., & Osbaldiston, N. (2016). Academic work/life balance: a brief quantitative analysis of the Australian experience. Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 890-906.
  29. Careau, E., Biba, G., Brander, R., Van Dijk, J. P., Verma, S., Paterson, M., & Tassone, M. (2014). Health leadership education programs, best practices, and impact on learners' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors and system change: A literature review. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 6, 39-50.
  30. Carvalho, V. S., & Chambel, M. J. (2016). Perceived high-performance work systems and subjective well-being: Work-to-family balance and well-being at work as mediators. Journal of Career Development, 43(2), 116-129.
  31. Chan, X. W., Kalliath, T., Brough, P., Siu, O. L., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Timms, C. (2016). Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work–life balance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1755-1776.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Benedicta Akey-Torku, Baozhen Dai, " Influence of Transformational Leadership on Work Engagement and Employee Performance, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp.62-73, January-February-2020. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT20616