Basic Survey on Quality of Different Incentive Software Systems

Authors(2) :-I. Rajendra Kumar, Dr. M. Babu Reddy

This paper provides a situation research in holding out an software system audit of a large, software-intensive system. We discuss about our survey on quality of different incentive software systems by dividing them into various groups for obtaining maximum efficiency in updated software system applications. We also discuss about different audit techniques/approaches/ methodologies to implement real time software systems with systematic operations. Finally, we observe software system implementation based on different audit approaches to support different scenario's in real time and incentive software systems.

Authors and Affiliations

I. Rajendra Kumar
Research Scholar, Computer Science Rayalaseema University, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India
Dr. M. Babu Reddy
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Krishna University, Machilipatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Cost Effective Analysis, Computation, Debuggers.

  1. M. Xie, Software Reliability Modeling. :World Scientific PublishingCompany, 1991.
  2. Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. : McGraw Hill, 1996.
  3. J. D. Musa, A. Iannino, and K. Okumoto, Software Reliability, Measurement, Prediction and Application. : McGraw Hill, 1987.
  4. H. Pham, Software Reliability. : Springer-Verlag, 2000.
  5. C. T. Lin and C. Y. Huang, “Enhancing and measuring the predictive capabilities of testing-effort dependent software reliability models,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1025-1038, June 2008.
  6. Y. S. Su and C. Y. Huang, “Neural-network-based approaches for software reliability estimation using dynamic weighted combinationalmodels,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 606-615,April 2007.
  7. S. Gokhale and M. R. Lyu, “A simulation approach to structure-basedsoftware reliability analysis,” IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol.31, no. 8, pp. 643-656, August 2005.
  8. S. Gokhale, “Architecture-based software reliability analysis:Overview and limitations,” IEEE Trans. Dependable and SecureComputing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32-40, Jan. 2007.
  9. K. Kanoun and J. C. Laprie, “Software reliability trend analyses fromtheoretical to practical considerations,” IEEE Trans. Software Engineering,vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 740-747, Sept. 1994.
  10. C. Y. Huang, M. R. Lyu, and S. Y. Kuo, “A unified scheme of somenon-homogenous Poisson process models for software reliabilityestimation,” IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp.261-269, March 2003.
  11. IEEE Recommended Practice for the Evaluation and Selection of CASE ToolsThe Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017, 1992. ANSI/IEEE Std. 1209-1992.
  12. Alan W. Brown, David J. Carney, Paul C. Clements, “A Case Study in Assessing the Maintainability of a Large, Software-Intensive System,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Engineering of Computer Based Systems, Tucson, AZ., IEEE Computer Society, March 1995.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 1 | Issue 2 | September-October 2016
Date of Publication : 2016-10-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 177-183
Manuscript Number : CSEIT218315
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-3307

Cite This Article :

I. Rajendra Kumar, Dr. M. Babu Reddy, "Basic Survey on Quality of Different Incentive Software Systems", International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp.177-183, September-October-2016.
Journal URL :

Article Preview