Enhanced Systematic Approach for Software Based on Cost Quality Assurance in Programming Model

Authors

  • I. Rajendra Kumar  Research Scholar, Computer Science Rayalaseema University, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Dr. M. Babu Reddy  Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Krishna University, Machilipatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords:

EffectiveCost Version, System Integrated Device version, SLIM, function points and COCOMO

Abstract

Development price evaluation is authentic experiencing fluctuating in programming growing applications, due to day by day programming motion, absence of subtle factors in new redeveloped advancements, frustrated patron prerequisites and not considering the recyclable attitude fee. Considering those problems in composed programming applications programming price evaluation can also perform set off perspective in programming growing. We consider making every other programming framework i.e. the device of the hybridized programming fee evaluation and it can be bedding explanations the growth and pass tiers for helping special programming updates and it creates cutting-edge day programs.The deliberate framework is changed to synchronize with COCOMO and COPSEMO price outlines with splendid factors of hobby influence of each section in programming movement method. We consider the effects to propose compelling elements of interest investigating of each and the product software with time aid of each one composed module.

References

  1. “Realistic Software Cost Estimation forFractionated  Space Systems”, By   Winsor Brown, RaminMoazeni, and Barry Bochm, AIAA SPACE 2009 Conference & Exposition 14 - 17 September 2009, Pasadena, California.
  2. “Coincomo Ii”, Center For Systems And Software Engineering Coincomo Ii Product Sheet, University Of Southern California Csse.
  3. “Optimized Software Cost Estimation using Swarm Optimization”, 1D. Manikavelan, 2Dr. R. Ponnuswamy,  ISSN : 0976-8491 (Online) | ISSN : 2229-4333 (Print) IJCST Vol. 2, Issue 4, Oct . - Dec. 2011.
  4. “An Empirical Validation of Software Cost Estimation Models” by CHRIS F. KEMERER, 01987 ACM OOOl-0782/87/0500-0416 750, and Communications of the ACM May 1987 Volume 30 Number 5.
  5. “Confidence in software cost estimation results based on MMRE and PRED ”, by M. Korte and D. Port, PROMISE’08, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 12-13, May 2008.
  6. H. K. Verma and V. Sharma, “Handling imprecision in inputs usingfuzzy logic to predict effort in software developmetn,” International Advance Computing Conference IEEE, 2010.
  7. Brown, O., and Eremenko, P. "Fractionated Space Architectures: A Vision for Responsive Space". 4th Responsive Space Conference: Paper No. AIAA-RS4-2006-1002, Los Angeles, CA: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2006.
  8. Mohammad Muhairat, SalehAldaajeh, Rafa E. Al-Qutaish,"The Impact of Global Software Development Factors onEffort Estimation Methods", 2010.
  9. VahidKhatibi, Dayang N. A. Jawawi, "Software CostEstimation Methods", A Review, CIS Journal. 2010-2011.
  10. Barry W. Boehm, Ricardo Valerdi, "Achievements andChallenges in Cocomo-Based Software ResourceEstimation", IEEE-2008.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2016-10-30

Issue

Volume 1, Issue 2, September-October-2016

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
I. Rajendra Kumar, Dr. M. Babu Reddy, " Enhanced Systematic Approach for Software Based on Cost Quality Assurance in Programming Model, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp.177-183, September-October-2016.