Improved System to Measure Vibrations

Authors

  • Sipli Abraham  Department of Civil Engineering, Mangalam College of Engineering, Kerala, India
  • Salini Theres N Kurian  Department of Civil Engineering, Mangalam College of Engineering, Kerala, India
  • Nissy M Susan Mani  Department of Civil Engineering, Mangalam College of Engineering, Kerala, India
  • Aswathi Soman  Department of Civil Engineering, Mangalam College of Engineering, Kerala, India
  • Sreerenj Ragav  Department of Civil Engineering, Mangalam College of Engineering, Kerala, India

Keywords:

Abstract

In this article, improving the calibration accuracy of a vibration sensor is being discussed in a closed loop measurement system and its performance metrics using Back-to-back direct comparison; and Back-to-back alternative comparison methods. The experimental results were analysed for time domain system with incorrect sensitivity with referential vibration source of 20 m/s–2peak amplitude and time domain system with calibrated sensitivity with referential vibration source of 10 m/s–2 peak amplitude.

References

  1. J. Wübbeke and B. Conrad, “Industrie 4.0’: Will Germantechnology help China catch up with the west?” [Online].Available: http://www.merics.org/en/merics-analyses/ china-monitor/merics-china-monitor-no-23.html.
  2. TE Connectivity, “TE connectivity and ETIRI jointly release thefirst Chinese engineers’ innovation motivation survey report,”
  3. G. McLaskey and S. Glaser, “Acoustic emission sensor calibrationfor absolute source measurements,” J. Nondestructive Evaluation,vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 157-168, 2012.
  4. Q. Li, Q. Zhang, M. Zhao, and L. Shi, “Study on calibration oftransfer character of ultrasonic transducer,” in CommunicationSystems and Information Technology. Berlin, Germany: SpringerBerlin Heidelberg, pp. 251-258, 2011.
  5. A. Ferrero and S. Salicone, “Measurement uncertainty,” IEEEInstrum.Meas. Mag., vol. 9, no .3, pp. 44-51, 2006.
  6. Y. Lei, “Study and realization in key techniques of low-frequencyvibration calibration system,” Thesis, Institute of EngineeringMechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2009.
  7. GB-T 20485.1-2008, “Methods for the calibration of vibration andshock transducers, part 1.”
  8. GB-T 20485.21-2007, “Methods for the calibration of vibration andshock transducers, Part 21.”
  9. ISO 9614-1 Acoustics, “Determination of sound power levelsof noise sources using sound intensity, part1, measurement atdiscrete points.”
  10. ISO 16063-21:2003, “Methods for the calibration of vibration andshock transducers, part 21, vibration calibration by comparison toa reference transducer.”

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2019-01-30

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 1, January-February-2019

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Sipli Abraham, Salini Theres N Kurian, Nissy M Susan Mani, Aswathi Soman, Sreerenj Ragav, " Improved System to Measure Vibrations, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp.633-637, January-February-2019.