Detecting and Minimizing Node Failure Context in Wireless Sensor Network

Authors

  • S. Parthiban  Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University/IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. Ramkumar  Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University/IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. Neranjana  Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University/IFET College of Engineering, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India

Keywords:

Wireless, Sensor Network, ACK, MIS, Poller

Abstract

Node failure detection in mobile wireless networks is very challenging due to node movements, the network may not be always connected, and the resources are limited. In this project, propose solutions to address the challenge specific to sensor networks, to design a fault tolerant, energy efficient monitoring system in a distributed manner. In proposed concept focus on fully distributed monitoring algorithms, objective to minimize the number of overall pollers while bounding the false alarm rate. To increase the energy efficiency and reduce the monitoring overhead, take the hop-by-hop aggregation opportunities in sensor network. When building the monitoring architecture, focus on the fundamental tradeoff between the number of monitoring nodes (i.e., poller) the false alarm rate. To achieve the optimal aggregation path problem and propose an opportunistic greedy algorithm, which achieves an approximation ratio.

References

  1. Dezun Dong, Yunhao Liu, and Xiang ke Liao, “Self-monitoring for sensor networks,” in MobiHoc, 2008.
  2. R. Badonnel, R. State, and O. Festor. Self-configurable fault monitoring in ad-hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 6(3):458–473, May 2008.
  3. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, 2000.
  4. Y. Bar-Shalom, T. Kirubarajan, and X.-R. Li. Estimation with Applica-tions to Tracking and Navigation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.
  5. D. Ben Khedher, R. Glitho, and R. Dssouli. A Novel Overlay-Based Failure Detection Architecture for MANET Applications. In IEEE International Conference on Networks, pages 130–135, 2007.
  6. C. Bettstetter. Smooth is Better than Sharp: A Random Mobility Model for Simulation of Wireless Networks. In Proc. of ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pages 19–27, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
  7. C. Bettstetter. Topology Properties of Ad Hoc Networks with Random Waypoint Mobility. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Commu-nications Review, 7(3):50–52, 2003.
  8. J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y.- C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad hoc Network Routing Protocols. In Proc. of MobiCom, pages 85–97, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM.
  9. T. D. Chandra and S. Toueg. Unreliable Failure Detectors for Reliable Distributed Systems. Journal of the ACM, 43:225–267, 1996.
  10. I. Constandache, R. R. Choudhury, and I. Rhee. Towards Mobile Phone Localization without War-Driving. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, March 2010.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
S. Parthiban, S. Ramkumar, S. Neranjana, " Detecting and Minimizing Node Failure Context in Wireless Sensor Network , IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp.429-433, March-April-2017.