Generating Semantic Frames from Queries Using Natural Language Query Processing In Concertize Search Engine

Authors

  • Pranali Khambalkar  BE Scholars, Department Of Computer Science & Engineering, J.D. College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Prachi Sawwalakhe  BE Scholars, Department Of Computer Science & Engineering, J.D. College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Nandini Kewale  BE Scholars, Department Of Computer Science & Engineering, J.D. College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Rutuja Margadhe  BE Scholars, Department Of Computer Science & Engineering, J.D. College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Samiksha Sahare  BE Scholars, Department Of Computer Science & Engineering, J.D. College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Anshul Rahule  BE Scholars, Department Of Computer Science & Engineering, J.D. College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Prof. Umesh S. Samarth  Assistant Professor, Department Of Computer Science & Engineering, J.D. College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Answering System, Template Matching, Natural Language Processing, QA System; NLP Algorithms; Semantic Similarity; User Intent

Abstract

Question and Answering (QA) frameworks are alluded as virtual associates and are imagined to be the cutting edge call focus. However the precision of such QA frameworks isn't as attractive and necessities critical upgrade. Understanding the goal of the inquiry is a critical supporter of an effective framework which has not been frequently broke down. To answer English dialect questions utilizing PC is an intriguing and testing issue. For the most part such issues are dealt with under two classifications: open Domain issues and close space issues. This paper exhibits a framework that endeavours to explain both close and open area issues. Answers to inquiries from close area can't be looked utilizing a web index. Henceforth answers must be put away in a database by an area master. At that point, the test is to comprehend the English dialect question with the goal that the arrangement could be coordinated to the separate answer in the database. We utilize a format coordinating method to play out this coordinating. The framework is produced with the end goal that the inquiries can be asked utilizing short messages from a cell phone and accordingly the framework is intended to comprehend SMS dialect notwithstanding English.

References

  1. Dong, X. L., Murphy, K., Gabrilovich, E., Heitz, G., Horn, W., Lao, N. & Zhang, W. (2014). Knowledge Vault: A Web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion.
  2. Carlos Castillo, Debora Donato et al., “FINDING HIGH QUALITY CONTENTS IN SOCIAL MEDIA”Yahoo! Research Barcelona, Spain, WSDM'08, February 11.12, 2008.
  3. J. P. Scott. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.SAGE Publications, January 2000.
  4. J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5):604{632, 1999.
  5. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
  6. R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In WWW '04: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 403{412, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press
  7. Q. Su, D. Pavlov, J.-H. Chow, and W. C. Baker. Internet-scale collection of human-reviewed data. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 231{240, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.
  8. C.-N. Ziegler and G. Lausen. Propagation models for trust and distrust in social networks. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(4-5):337{358, December 2005.
  9. J. Zhang, M. S. Ackerman, and L. Adamic. Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 221{230, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.
  10. P. Jurczyk and E. Agichtein. HITS on question answer portals: an exploration of link analysis for author ranking. In SIGIR (posters). ACM, 2007.
  11. B. Dom, I. Eiron, A. Cozzi, and Y. Zhang. Graph-based ranking algorithms for e-mail expertise analysis. In Proceedings of Workshop on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 42{48, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
  12. T. Joachims, L. A. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting click through data as implicit feedback. In SIGIR, pages 154{161, 2005.
  13. K. Ali and M. Scarr. Robust methodologies for modeling web click distributions. In WWW, pages 511{520, 2007.
  14. C. Anderson. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. Hyperion, July 2006.
  15. Y. Attali and J. Burstein. Automated essay scoring with e-rater v.2. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3), February 2006.
  16. A. L. Berger, V. J. D. Pietra, and S. A. D. Pietra. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39{71, 1996.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Pranali Khambalkar, Prachi Sawwalakhe, Nandini Kewale, Rutuja Margadhe, Samiksha Sahare, Anshul Rahule, Prof. Umesh S. Samarth, " Generating Semantic Frames from Queries Using Natural Language Query Processing In Concertize Search Engine, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp.209-214, March-April-2018.