Pushover Analysis of Irregular Steel Structure with Varying Irregularity Ratios

Authors

  • Rahul NK  Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Outer Ring Road, Marathalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Gowtham  Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Outer Ring Road, Marathalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Kishore Hosmane  Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Outer Ring Road, Marathalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Kumari Vishwa Teja  Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Outer Ring Road, Marathalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Mallikarjun  Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Outer Ring Road, Marathalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Keywords:

Irregularity ratio; plan irregularity; pushover analysis; seismic behaviour; vertical geometric irregularity.

Abstract

In this paper the seismic performance of irregular steel structure with varying irregularity ratio have been investigated. For the study purpose, two different models with vertical geometric irregularity and plan irregularity according to IS 1893 (part 1) -2002 have been considered. The irregularity ratio (A/L) where A is offset and L is base width has been varied from 0.2 to 0.8. Irregular structures have been modeled using ETABS, a finite element software and plastic hinges are assigned to incorporate the inelastic seismic behaviour of structures. Performance of eleven irregular structures has been compared with regular frame structure in terms of base shear carrying capacity, roof displacement and performance point, using pushover analysis. The results indicates that as irregularity ratio increases, base shear carrying capacity and performance point of irregular structure decreases.

References

  1. M. G. Kalibhat, K. Kamath, S. K. Prasad and R. P. Ramya, “Seismic performance of concentric braced steel frames from pushover analysis”, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, (2012), pp.67-73.
  2. K. Kamath, and S. Anil, “Fragility curves for low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise concrete moment resisting frame building for seismic vulnerability assessment”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 08, issue 03, (2016), pp.510-519.
  3. ATC 40. “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings”, America Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, (1996).
  4. Y. Yashar and P. Maryam, “Investigation the 3D-pushover analysis of unsymmetrical concrete structure”, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2012).
  5. V. M Milind, “Pushover analysis of a structure with plan irregulilarity”, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Vol 12, issue 04, (2015), pp.46-55.
  6. C.B. Rai, and A. Ricardo, “Pushover Analysis of Asymmetrical Three Dimensional Building Frames”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol 11, (2015), pp.03-12.
  7. N. J. Babu, K.V.J.D Balaji, and S.S.S.V. Gopalaraju, “Pushover Analysis of Unsymmetrical Structure on sloping Ground” International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environment and Infrastructure Engineering research and Development, Vol 02, issue 04, (2012), pp.45-54
  8. P. Magudeaswaran, A. Dinesh, and P. Eswaramoorthi, “Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame”, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Techonlogy, Vol 07, issue 02, (2016).
  9. K. Kamath, Shruthi, and R. Shashikumar “ Comparative study on Concentric Steel Braced Frame Structure due to Effect of Aspect Ratio Using Pushover Analysis”, International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering and Technology, Vol 04, issue 03, (2015), pp.247-252
  10. M. Padmakar “Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame”, NITK Rourkela Project Thesis, (2013).
  11. IS 1893 (Part-I). “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structure”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (2002).
  12. IS 875 (Part-I). “Code of practice for design loads for buildings and structures-Dead loads”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (1987).
  13. IS 875 (Part-II). “Code of practice for design loads for buildings and structures-Imposed loads”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, (1987).
  14. IS 800. “General Construction in Steel”, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India, (2007).

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Rahul NK, Gowtham, Kishore Hosmane, Kumari Vishwa Teja, Mallikarjun, " Pushover Analysis of Irregular Steel Structure with Varying Irregularity Ratios" International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 4, Issue 9, pp.75-82, November-December-2019.