Characteristics of Cement Stabilized Masonry Blocks Prepared from Brick Masonry and Concrete Waste - Experimental Study

Authors

  • Vinay Kumar B M  Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Outer Ring Road, Marathalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Surendra B V   Department of Civil Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Outer Ring Road, Marathalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Keywords:

Concrete and brick masonry waste, Cement Stabilized Masonry Blocks (CSMB), Fine recycled concrete aggregate (FRCA), Brick powder (BP)

Abstract

This experimental study deals with utilization of brick masonry and concrete waste in preparation of cement stabilized masonry block(CSMB). Brick masonry waste and concrete waste are crushed into granular form and designated as brick powder (BP) and fine recycled concrete aggregate (FRCA) respectively. BP and FRCA are used in 70:30 proportions and cement content is varied as 6%, 8%, and 10%. The static compaction method is used to fix the optimum water content as 16% for all the three mixes. The size of the CSMB units is 190×90×90 mm and it is tested for dry density, wet compressive strength, water absorption and rate of moisture absorption. Correction factors reported in the literature are used to arrive at uniaxial compressive strength. The compressive strength of CSMB units of size 190x90x90 are found to be in excess of 3.5MPa, except for 6% cement content, with correction factor = 0.58. A simple equation is proposed to compute the representative 28 days wet compressive strength of CSMB units without correction factors as f = 0.8 C, with C as % of cement in the mix. The water absorption of CSMB units are within permissible limit of 18%. The rate of moisture absorption of the units is found to follow an exponential trend. Nearly 50% of absorption is found to take place in the first 30 mins of soaking. To study the influence of size, CSMB units of size 290x190x90 mm with 8% cement are cast and wet compressive strength is determined on the cubes 70 mm and 90 mm cut from the CSMB units 290x190 x90 mm, as well as, on the units also. The 70 mm and 90 mm cube samples cut from CSMB units show a decrease of 32% and 35% in wet compressive strength when compared with 70.6 mm cube samples cast from the same mix. The 28 days wet compressive strength of CSMB units 290 x190 x90 mm with aspect ratio as 0.47 is about 70% more than the strength attained with units 190 x90x90 mm with aspect ratio as 1.0.

References

  1. F. Debieb, S. Kenai, “The use of coarse and fine crushed bricks as aggregate in concrete”, Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 22, pp.886–893, 2008.
  2. P.B. Cachim, “Mechanical properties of brick aggregate concrete”, Constr. Build. Mater. , Vol. 23, pp. 1292–1297, 2009.
  3. J. Yang, Q Du, Y Bao, Concrete with recycled concrete aggregate and crushed clay bricks, Constr. Build. Mater. Vol.25, pp. 1935–1945, 2011.
  4. L.Zheng, Z. Ge1, Z. Yao, R.Sun, J.Dong, “The properties of concrete with recycled clay-brick-powder”, App. Mech. Mater. Vol.99-100, pp. 826-831,2011.
  5. Z. Ge, Z. Gao, R. Sun, L. Zheng, “Mix design of concrete with recycled clay-brick-powder using the orthogonal design method”, Constr. Build. Mater. Vol.31 pp. 289–293,2012.
  6. A .A. Aliabdo, Abd-Elmoaty M. Abd-Elmoaty, H.H. Hassan, “Utilization of crushed clay brick in the concrete industry”, Alex. Eng. J.,Vol..53,pp. 151–168,2014.
  7. D. Tavakoli, A. Heidari,S. H. Pilehrood, “Properties of concrete made with waste clay brick as sand incorporating nano SiO2”,Indian J. Sci.Tech.Vol.7(12),pp.1899–1905,2014.
  8. C. S. Poon, D. Chan, “Paving blocks made with recycled concrete aggregate and crushed clay brick”, Constr. Build. Mater. Vol.20, pp.569–577, 2016.
  9. D.M. Sadek,“ Physico-mechanical properties of solid cement bricks containing recycled aggregates”, J. Adv. Res. Vol. 3, pp.253–260,2012.
  10. Venkatarama Reddy B.V., “Pressed Soil-Cement Block: An Alternative Building Material for Masonry”, CIB TG 16, Sustainable Construction, Tampa, Florida, USA, 1994.
  11. Walker P.J, “Strength, durability and shrinkage characteristics of cement stabilized soil blocks”, Cem. Concr. Comp. Vol. 17(4), (1995) pp.301-310, 1995.
  12. Venkatarama Reddy, B. V., Jagadish, K. S., “Influence of soil composition on the strength and durability of soil-cement blocks”, Indian Concr. J. Vol. 69(9), pp. 517–524,2009.
  13. Walker P, Specification for stabilized pressed earth blocks, Masonry Int (1996) 10:1-6
  14. Walker, P, “Characteristics of pressed earth blocks in compression. 11th International brick block masonry” conference, Tongji university, shanghai, china, pp.1-7, 1997.
  15. Walker. P., Stace, T., “Properties of some cement stabilised compressed earth blocks and mortars”, Mater. Struct. Vol. 30, pp.545-551, 1997.
  16. Venkatarama Reddy, B.V., Gupta. A., “Characteristics of soil-cement blocks using highly sandy soils”, Mater. Struct. Vol. 38, pp. 651-658, 2005.
  17. Venkatarama Reddy B. V., Richardson Lal. Nanjunda Rao K. S., “Optimum Soil Grading for the Soil-Cement Blocks”, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 19(2), pp.139-148, 2007.
  18. Hyug-Moon K., Anh Tuan Le, Ninh Thuy Nguyen., “Influence of Soil Grading on Properties of Compressed Cement-soil”, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. Vol. 14(6), pp. 845-853,2010.
  19. Venkatarama Reddy B. V., Latha M. S., “Influence of soil grading on the characteristics of cement stabilized soil compacts”, Mater. Struct., Vol. 47, pp. 1633–1645, 2014.
  20. IS 8112: 2013, “Indian standard ordinary portland cement, 43 Grade – specification”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  21. IS 4031- 1:1996, “Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part-1: Determination of Fineness by Dry Sieving”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  22. IS 4031- 2:1999,”Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part-2: Determination of Fineness by Specific Surface by Blaine Air Permeability Method”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  23. IS 4031- 4:1988, “Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part-4: Determination of consistency of standard cement paste”. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  24. IS 4031- 5:1989, “Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part-5: Determination of Initial and Final setting times”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  25. IS 4031- 6:1988, “Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part-6: Determination of Compressive strength of Hydraulic Cement”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  26. IS 4031-11:1988, “Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part-11: Determination of Density”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  27. IS 2386:1963 (R2002), “Indian standard methods of test for aggregates for concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  28. IS 1725:2013, Stabilized soil blocks used in general building construction-specification, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  29. IS 3495 (Part 1):1992 (R2002), “Indian Standard methods of tests of burnt clay building bricks - Determination of compressive strength”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  30. IS 3495 (Part 2):1992 (R2002), “Indian Standard methods of tests of burnt clay building bricks - Determination of water absorption”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  31. W.J. Krefeld, “Effect of shape of specimen on the apparent compressive strength of brick masonry”, Proceedings of the American Society of Materials , Philadelphia, USA, pp. 363- 369,1938.
  32. K. Heathcote, E. Jankulovski, “Aspect ratio correction factors for soilcrete blocks”, Australian Civil Engineering Transactions, Institution of Engineers Australia CE34(4) pp.309-312,1992.
  33. Aubert, J.E., Maillard, P., Morel, J.C., M. Al Rafii, “Towards a simple compressive strength test for earth bricks?” Mater. Struct. Vol. 49, pp.1641-1654,2016.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Vinay Kumar B M, Surendra B V , " Characteristics of Cement Stabilized Masonry Blocks Prepared from Brick Masonry and Concrete Waste - Experimental Study" International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 4, Issue 9, pp.54-59, November-December-2019.