A Survey of Machine Learning models for the wide Spectrum of Computational Biology
DOI:
https://doi.org//10.32628/CSEIT2063149Keywords:
Computational biology, genome, phenotype, Neural network, Clustering, Prediction.Abstract
With the Advent of advancement in the field of Artificial Intelligence the computer is made more intelligent and can enable to think and make prediction accurately. The machine learning being a subfield of Artificial Intelligence is used in numerous research works. Different analysts feel that enormous data generated in field of biology have to be sorted in an intelligent way to yield best model. There are numerous kinds of Machine Learning Techniques like Unsupervised, Semi Supervised, Supervised, Reinforcement, and Evolutionary Learning and Deep Learning. These learning’s are used to classify huge data at a rapid pace. This paper discusses about the wide spectrum of Biology and the process of pre-processing data and the best suitable Machine learning model for each of them.
References
- B. Linghu, E.S. Snitkin, Z. Hu, Y. Xia, C. DeLisi, Genome-wide prioritization of disease genes and identification of disease-disease associations from an integrated human functional linkage network, Genome Biol. 10 (9) (2009) R91.
- ENCODE Project Consortium, An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome, Nature 489 (7414) (2012) 57.
- A. Lundby, E.J. Rossin, A.B. Steffensen, M.R. Acha, C. Newton-Cheh, A. Pfeufer, S.N. Lynch, S.-P. Olesen, S. Brunak, P.T. Ellinor, et al., Annotation of loci from genome-wide association studies using tissue-specific quantitative interaction proteomics, Nat. Methods 11 (8) (2014) 868–874.
- A. Kundaje, et al., Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes, Nature 518 (7539) (2015) 317–330.
- M.D. Ritchie, E.R. Holzinger, R. Li, S.A. Pendergrass, D. Kim, Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions, Nat. Rev. Genet. 16 (2) (2015) 85–97.
- M. Zitnik, B. Zupan, Data imputation in epistatic MAPs by network-guided matrix completion, J. Computation. Biol. 22 (6) (2015) 595–608.
- M. Costanzo, B. VanderSluis, E.N. Koch, A. Baryshnikova, C. Pons, G. Tan, W. Wang, M. Usaj, J. Hanchard, S.D. Lee, et al., A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function, Science 353 (6306) (2016). aaf1420
- Zeng, J.; Li, D.; Wu, Y.; Zou, Q.; Liu, X. An empirical study of features fusion techniques for protein-protein interaction prediction. Curr. Bioinform. 2016, 11, 4–12.
- X. Li, J. Dunn, D. Salins, G. Zhou, W. Zhou, S.M.S.-F. Rose, D. Perelman, E. Colbert, R. Runge, S. Rego, et al., Digital health: tracking physiomes and activity using wearable biosensors reveals useful health-related information, PLoS Biol. 15 (1) (2017). e2001402
- R.A. Hodos, et al., In silico methods for drug repurposing and pharmacology, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 8 (3) (2016) 186–210.
- N. Zong, H. Kim, V. Ngo, O. Harismendy, Deep mining heterogeneous networks of biomedical linked data to predict novel drug–target associations, Bioinformatics (2017). btx160
- Luo, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kuang, W.; Peng, J.; Chen, L.; Zeng, J. A network integration approach for drug-target interaction prediction and computational drug repositioning from heterogeneous information. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 573. CrossRefPubMed]
- Camacho, D.M.; Collins, K.M.; Powers, R.K.; Costello, J.C.; Collins, J.J. Next-generation machine learning for biological networks. Cell 2018, 173, 1581–1592. CrossRefPubMed]
- Marinka Zitnika, Francis Nguyenb,c , Bo Wangd,Jure Leskoveca,e, Anna Goldenbergf,g,h,MichaelM.Hoffmanb,c,g,h,∗Machine learning for integrating data in biology and medicine: Principles, practice, and opportunities Science Direct 201
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.