A Big Data and the Machine Learning Algorithms
Keywords:
Abstract
The Mayor of central banks discusses the dental institute of big data processing on big topics. Microdots are used with automated redesign applications in a variety of cases, including investigation, monetary policy and the established financier. Central banks are informed that they use big data for supervision and regulation (suptech and regtech applications). The quality, sample, and presentation of the data are important data for the central banks, even though the legal security on the lathe is due to the privacy and confidentiality of the data. Information institutes provide a variety of information that can be assessed on the basis of the infrastructure to be assessed, the infrastructure, to the humanitarian need. Cooperation between public authorities allows the capacity of central banks to be recovered, sorted, and analyzed macrodactyly.
References
- Altig, D, S Baker, J Barrero, N Bloom, P Bunn, S Chen, S Davis, J Leather, B Meyer, E Mihaylov and P Mizen (2020): “Economic uncertainty before and during the Covid-19 pandemic”, Journal of Public Economics, vol 191, September, pp 104–274.
- Angwin, J, J Larson, S Mattu and L Kirchner (2016): “Machine bias”, ProPublica, 23 May.
- Amstad, M, L Gambacorta, C He and D Xia (2021): “Trade sentiment and the stock market: new evidence based on big data textual analysis of Chinese media”, BIS Working Papers, no 917.
- Andersen, A, E Hansen, N Johannesen and A Sheridan (2020): “Consumer responses to the Covid-19 crisis: evidence from bank account transaction data”, CEPR Discussion Papers, no 14809.
- Athey, S and G Imbens (2019): “Machine learning methods that economists should know about”, Annual Review of Economics, vol 11, pp 685–725.
- Bailey, M, R Cao, T Kuchler and J Stroebel (2018): “The economic effects of social networks: evidence from the housing market”, Journal of Political Economy, vol 126, no 6, pp 2224–76.
- Baker, S, N Bloom and S Davis (2016): “Measuring economic policy uncertainty”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol 131, no 4, pp 1593–636.
- Baker, S, R Farrokhnia, S Meyer, M Pagel and C Yannelis (2020): “How does household spending respond to an epidemic? Consumption during the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic”, NBER Working Papers, no 26949.
- Battaglini, M and E Patacchini (2019): “Social networks in policy making”, Annual Review of Economics, vol 11, pp 473–94.
- Boissay, F, T Ehlers, L Gambacorta and H S Shin (2020): “Big techs in finance: on the new nexus between data privacy and competition”, in R Rau, R Wardrop and L Zingales (eds), The Handbook of Technological Finance, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bolón-Canedo, V, N Sánchez-Maroño and A Alonso-Betanzos (2015): “Recent advances and emerging challenges of feature selection in the context of big data”, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol 86, September, pp 33–45.
- Broeders, D and J Prenio (2018): “Innovative technology in financial supervision (suptech) – the experience of early users”, FSI Insights, no 9.
- Buch, C (2019): “Welcoming remarks International Seminar on Big Data”, Building Pathways for Policy-Making with Big Data, Bali, 26 July 2018, also in IFC Bulletin (2015).
- Cantú, C, S Doerr, G Cheng, J Frost and L Gambacorta (2020): ”On health and privacy: technology to combat the pandemic”, BIS Bulletin, no 17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.