Data Privacy and Ethics in Occupational Health and Screening Systems
Keywords:
Data Privacy, Ethics, Occupational Health, HIPAA/GDPR ComplianceAbstract
This report describes data privacy and ethics issues in occupational health and screening systems, the challenges and solutions concerning the protection of sensitive employee health information. And as digital health records and workplace monitoring systems grow more widely used, there is an increasing need to guarantee HIPAA and GDPR compliance. The paper examines the role of informed consent, data access control and the ethical implications, specifically in regards to its inclusion of AI and ML integration. The paper highlights the requirements for preparing for the protection of employee's privacy with robust frameworks for efficient health monitoring while ensuring employee trust inside and outside the workplace.
References
- Fernández-Alemán, J.L., Señor, I.C., Lozoya, P.Á.O. and Toval, A., 2013. Security and privacy in electronic health records: A systematic literature review. Journal of biomedical informatics, 46(3), pp.541-562.
- Nielsen, K., Randall, R., Holten, A.L. and González, E.R., 2010. Conducting organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works?. Work and Stress, 24(3), pp.234-259.
- D'Arcy, J., Herath, T. and Shoss, M.K., 2014. Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. Journal of management information systems, 31(2), pp.285-318.
- Smith, H.J., Dinev, T. and Xu, H., 2011. Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS quarterly, pp.989-1015.
- Bender, E.M. and Friedman, B., 2018. Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, pp.587-604.
- Guo, K.H., Yuan, Y., Archer, N.P. and Connelly, C.E., 2011. Understanding nonmalicious security violations in the workplace: A composite behavior model. Journal of management information systems, 28(2), pp.203-236.
- Katsnelson, B.A., Privalova, L.I., Gurvich, V.B., Kuzmin, S.V., Kireyeva, E.P., Minigalieva, I.A., Sutunkova, M.P., Loginova, N.V., Malykh, O.L., Yarushin, S.V. and Soloboyeva, J.I., 2014. Enhancing population’s resistance to toxic exposures as an auxilliary tool of decreasing environmental and occupational health risks (a self-overview). Journal of Environmental Protection, 5(14), pp.1435-1449.
- Moreira, I.C., Amaral, I., Domingues, I., Cardoso, A., Cardoso, M.J. and Cardoso, J.S., 2012. Inbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Academic radiology, 19(2), pp.236-248.
- Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S. and Floridi, L., 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data and Society, 3(2), p.2053951716679679.
- Robson, M.E., Storm, C.D., Weitzel, J., Wollins, D.S. and Offit, K., 2010. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. Journal of clinical oncology, 28(5), pp.893-901.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.