A Literature Review of in IS Adoption Model Factors

Authors

  • Nur Ani  Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Vina Ayumi  Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Handrie Noprisson  Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT19555

Keywords:

IS Adoption Model, Systematic Literature Review, Model Factors

Abstract

The propose of this research is to review the IS adoption model that can be applied to Enterprise 2.0 such as including social networks, virtual community (group discussion), cyber meetings, online chat, enterprise social software, social commerce, Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and project management. The systematic literature review (SLR) method used in this research is proposed by Kitchenham in 2004. This research reviewed 257 research papers and then selection process used the inclusion criteria based on the title and abstract, and it selected 47 paper. In the selection process used inclusion criteria for full text and it produced 19 paper. Then in the final stage or the 3rd stage, the selection used exclusion criteria and produce 15 papers. As conclusions, IS adoption model adopt some theories such as TOE framework, TAM, UTAUT, TOS, diffusion innovation theory and social capital theory. Some factors that affect the adoption of this model are technology, organization, environment, competency, personal and others.

References

  1. Al-Ani, B., Wang, Y., Marczak, S., Trainer, E., & Redmiles, D. (2012). Distributed developers and the non-use of Web 2.0 technologies: A proclivity model. Proceedings - 2012 IEEE 7th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE 2012, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2012.39
  2. Antonius, N., Xu, J., & Gao, X. (2015). Factors influencing the adoption of Enterprise Social Software in Australia. Knowledge-Based Systems, 73, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.09.003
  3. Askool, S., & Nakata, K. (2012). Investigation into the adoption intention of social CRM in Saudi banks. International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2012), 402.
  4. Barron, A., & Schneckenberg, D. (2012). A theoretical framework for exploring the influence of national culture on Web 2.0 adoption in corporate contexts. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 15(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/ISSN 1566-6379
  5. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation- Confirmation Mode. Management Information Systems, 25(3), 351–370.
  6. Davis, F. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (December 1985), 291.
  7. Hoong, A. L. S., Lim, T.-M., & Aripin, R. (2013). The Role of Affect on the Acceptance of Web 2.0 as Organizational Knowledge Sharing Systems. 2013 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 450–455. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2013.69
  8. Husin, M. H., Evans, N., & Deegan, G. (2016). Achieving adoption and effective usage of Web 2.0 among employees within Australian government organizations. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 18(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-04-2015-0031
  9. Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-García, Á., & Fernández-Cardador, P. (2014). How socially derived characteristics of technology shape the adoption of corporate Web 2.0 tools for collaboration. Service Business, 8(3), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0250-1
  10. Kim, S. (2012). Factors affecting the use of social software: TAM perspectives. Electronic Library, The, 30, 690–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211275729
  11. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(TR/SE-0401), 28. https://doi.org/10.1.1.122.3308
  12. Kügler, M., Smolnik, S., & Raeth, P. (2012). Why don’t you use it? Assessing the determinants of enterprise social software usage: A conceptual model integrating innovation diffusion and social capital theories. Icis-Rp, 5, 3672–3685. https://doi.org/icis2012/proceedings
  13. Kügler, M., Smolnik, S., & Raeth, P. (2013). Determining the Factors Influencing Enterprise Social Software Usage: Development of a Measurement Instrument for Empirical Assessment. HICSS 2013 Proceedings, 3635–3644. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.173
  14. Liao, C., Palvia, P., & Chen, J. L. (2009). Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT). International Journal of Information Management, 29(4), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.004
  15. Mukkamala, A. M., & Razmerita, L. (2014). Which Factors Influence the Adoption of Social Software? Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 17(3), 188–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2014.951296
  16. Peris, M., Blinn, N., Nüttgens, M., Lindermann, N., & Von Kortzfleisch, H. (2013). Acceptance of professional Web 2.0 platforms in regional SME networks: An evaluation based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2793–2802. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.70
  17. Pratama, M. O., Meiyanti, R., Noprisson, H., Ramadhan, A., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2017). Influencing factors of consumer purchase intention based on social commerce paradigm. Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2017 International Conference On, 73–80. IEEE Xplore.
  18. Soto-Acosta, P., Perez-Gonzalez, D., & Popa, S. (2014). Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs. Service Business, 8(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0247-9
  19. Sucahyo, Y. G., Rotinsulu, Y. Y., Hidayanto, A. N., Fitrianah, D., & Phusavat, K. (2017). Software as a service quality factors evaluation using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 24(1), 51–68.
  20. Taylor, P., Wang, T., Jung, C., Kang, M., & Chung, Y. (2013). Exploring determinants of adoption intentions towards Enterprise 2 . 0 applications : an empirical study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1048–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.781221
  21. Yan Xin, J., Ramayah, T., Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Ai Ping, T. (2014). Analyzing the Use of Web 2.0 for Brand Awareness and Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study in the Malaysian Hospitability Industry. Information Systems Management, 31(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.890425

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 5, September-October-2019

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Nur Ani, Vina Ayumi, Handrie Noprisson, " A Literature Review of in IS Adoption Model Factors" International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp.92-98, September-October-2019. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT19555