Fake Detection of Online Reviews using Semi-Supervised and Supervised Learning

Authors

  • Aneel Narayanapur  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SKSVMACET Laxmeshwar, Karnataka, India
  • Pavankumar Naik  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SKSVMACET Laxmeshwar, Karnataka, India
  • Suraksha G  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SKSVMACET Laxmeshwar, Karnataka, India
  • Pavitra S I  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SKSVMACET Laxmeshwar, Karnataka, India
  • Shruddha Mudigoudar  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SKSVMACET Laxmeshwar, Karnataka, India
  • Megha Honnali  Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SKSVMACET Laxmeshwar, Karnataka, India

Keywords:

Fake reviews, semi-supervised learning, super-vised learning, Naive Bayes classifier, Support Vector Machine classifier, Expectation-maximization algorithm.

Abstract

Online reviews have great impact on today's business and commerce. Decision making for purchase of online products mostly depends on reviews given by the users. Hence, opportunistic individuals or groups try to manipulate product reviews for their own interests. This paper introduces some semi-supervised and supervised text mining models to detect fake online reviews as well as compares the efficiency of both techniques on data set containing hotel reviews.

References

  1. Chengai Sun, Qiaolin Du and Gang Tian, “Exploiting Product Related Review Features for Fake Review Detection,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016
  2. A. Heydari, M. A. Tavakoli, N. Salim, and Z. Heydari, ”Detection of review spam: a survey”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 3634–3642, 2015.
  3. M. Ott, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock, “Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination,” in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguis-tics: Human echnologies .ACL-HLT), vol. 1, pp. 309–319, Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Ore, USA, June 2011.
  4. J. W. Pennebaker, M. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth, ”Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: Liwc,” vol. 71, 2001.
  5. S. Feng, R. Banerjee, and Y. Choi, “Syntactic stylometry for deception detection,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers, Vol. 2, 2012.
  6. J. Li, M. Ott, C. Cardie, and E. Hovy, “Towards a general rule for identifying deceptive opinion spam,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL) 2014.
  7. E. P. Lim, V.-A. Nguyen, N. Jindal, B. Liu, and H. W. Lauw, “Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2010
  8. J. K. Rout, A. Dalmia, and K.-K. R. Choo, “Revisiting semi-supervised learning for online deceptive review detection,” IEEE Access, Vol. 5, pp. 1319–1327, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Aneel Narayanapur, Pavankumar Naik, Suraksha G, Pavitra S I, Shruddha Mudigoudar, Megha Honnali, " Fake Detection of Online Reviews using Semi-Supervised and Supervised Learning " International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp.428-431, May-June-2020.