Blended- Learning Approach for Ethiopian Education System : In Case of Second Generation University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2063206Keywords:
Blended, Blended-Learning, Online Learning, Face-To-Face Learning.Abstract
Ethiopian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are striving to provide effective learning experiences to address the needs of the digitally-oriented generation of learners. Blended learning has emerged as a solution to address these needs and has been adopted by various universities in developed country. However, not all Ethiopian second Generation University adopts blended-learning. Blended-learning refers to the systematic integration of online and face-to-face engagement to support and enhance meaningful interaction between students, teachers and resources. Blended learning offers many potential advantages and disadvantages that will largely depend on the quality of the learning design and model. Blended learning gives students with special educational needs the benefits of both online learning and in-person instruction. The paper proffered workable recommendation for implementing a blended-learning environment. In conclusion, the paper recommends that since Ethiopia is one of from developing countries must be intentional about skills acquisition so as to be well equipped to join their counterparts in other developed climes to play a significant and principal role in the ever dynamic sophisticated learning environment.
References
- Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
- Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vey, N., & Reiser, J. (1986).
- Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan-Page.
- Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design.
- Graham, C.R. (2006). Definition, current trends, and future directions. Dalam C.
- Gustafson, K. L., and Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models. Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York .
- Dziuban, C.D., Joel, L.H., & Moskal, P.D. (2004). Blended learning. Research Bulletin, 7.
- Molenda, M., & Boling, E. (2008). Creating. In A. Januszewski and M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary. (pp. 82_ 130).
- Morgan, K.R. (2002). Blended learning: A strategic action plan for a new campus. Seminole, FL: University of Central Florida.
- Murphy, P. (2003). The Hybrid strategy: Blending face-to-face with virtual (Online),
- Osguthorpe, R., & Graham, R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3),
- Purcell,J., Boxall, P., & Wright, P (2009). The oxford handbook of human resource management. Oxford University Press.
- Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Beger, G. and Sinha, A. (2012) South African mobile generation:
- Benson, V., Anderson, D. and Ooms, A. (2011) “Educators’ perceptions, attitudes and practices: Blended learning in business and management education”
- Davis, F.D. (1993) “User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts”,
- Fresen, J.W. (2010) “Factors influencing lecturer uptake of e-learning”,
- Jackson, A. (2011) “What are the Pros and cons of blended learning–Part 1”, Learning Academy Blog. 30 June 2011.
- Olivier, J. (2011) Accommodating and promoting multilingualism through blended learning, (North-West University)
- Rogers, E.M., Singhal, A. and Quinlan, M.M. (1999) Diffusion of innovations. An integrated approach to communication theory and research, New York: Routledge
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.