A Survey on Risk Analysis in Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) Change Management Using Supervised Machine Learning

Authors

  • Srushti Gajjar  U. & PU. Patel Department of Computer Engineering, Chandubhai S. Patel Institute of Technology, CSPIT, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Charusat, Changa, India
  • Mrugendrasinh Rahevar   U. & PU. Patel Department of Computer Engineering, Chandubhai S. Patel Institute of Technology, CSPIT, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Charusat, Changa, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT206371

Keywords:

ITIL Change Management, Risk Analysis, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, KNN

Abstract

Innovation in IT and technology leads to new developments within the organization. It is important for companies to respond more quickly to the changing trends in order to stay competitive. ITIL change management allows companies to introduce new technologies without interruption or downtime. It follows a standard practice to avoid any unwanted interruptions and involves evaluation, planning and approval of changes. Change Management is all about managing risk for the company and it is linked to the perception of risk that the company has. Risk Analysis is primary component when it comes to any software changes; organizations are concerned about risk management. For better performance by identifying and assessing risk in systematic manner is the aim of the risk management. In ITIL change management risk assessment is a manual process. Automation of risk analysis would have enormous benefits, like reducing the downtime, maximize the productivity and so on. So this paper is mainly on the survey of different supervised machine algorithms of machine learning, like support vector machine, Naive Bayes, logistic regressions.

References

  1. M. Goman, “Towards unambiguous IT risk definition,” in Proceedings of the Central European Cybersecurity Conference 2018 on - CECC 2018, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2018, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1145/3277570.3277586.
  2. J. A. Keizera, J. I. M. Halman, and M. Song, “From experience: applying the risk diagnosing methodology,” J Product Innovation Man, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 213–232, May 2002, doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.1930213.
  3. C. Fang and F. Marle, “A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 635–644, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.021.
  4. P. Chaudhary, D. Singh, and A. Sharma, “Classification of Software Project Risk Factors Using Machine Learning Approach,” in Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, vol. 385, S. Berretti, S. M. Thampi, and S. Dasgupta, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 297–309.
  5. S. K and D. R, “Designing a Machine Learning Based Software Risk Assessment Model Using Naïve Bayes Algorithm,” TAGA JOURNAL, vol. VOL. 14, pp. 3141–3147, 2018.
  6. T. Christiansen, P. Wuttidittachotti, S. Prakancharoen, and S. A. Vallipakorn, “Prediction of Risk Factors of Software Development Project By Using Multiple Regression,” Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN), vol. VOL. 10, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2015.
  7. Y. Hu, X. Zhang, E. W. T. Ngai, R. Cai, and M. Liu, “Software project risk analysis using Bayesian networks with causality constraints,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 56, pp. 439–449, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.001.
  8. “Why Software Fails.” IEEE Spectrum, Sep-2005.
  9. A. K. Sangaiah, O. W. Samuel, X. Li, M. Abdel-Basset, and H. Wang, “Towards an efficient risk assessment in software projects–Fuzzy reinforcement paradigm,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 71, pp. 833–846, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.07.022.
  10. C. Kumar and D. K. Yadav, “A Probabilistic Software Risk Assessment and Estimation Model for Software Projects,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 54, pp. 353–361, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.041.
  11. J. C. B. CHRISTOPHER, “A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition.” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1998.
  12. J. S.N., “Efficient Classification Algorithms using SVMs for Large Datasets,” Supercomputer Education and Research Center INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE BANGALORE – 560 012, INDIA, Jun. 2007.
  13. Z. Xu, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, and E. B. Allen, “Application of fuzzy expert systems in assessing operational risk of software,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 373–388, May 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0950-5849(03)00010-7.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June-2020

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Srushti Gajjar, Mrugendrasinh Rahevar , " A Survey on Risk Analysis in Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) Change Management Using Supervised Machine Learning " International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp.298-303, May-June-2020. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT206371