The Impact of Quantum Supremacy on Cryptography : Implications for Secure Financial Transactions

Authors

  • Sachin Dixit  Principal Software Engineer, Yahoo Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2064141

Keywords:

Quantum Supremacy, Public-Key Encryption, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Lattice-Based Cryptography, Secure Financial Transactions, Quantum-Resistant Algorithms, Shor’s Algorithm, Grover’s Algorithm, Digital Financial Ecosystems, Cryptographic Frameworks.

Abstract

The advent of quantum supremacy, defined as the point at which quantum computers outperform classical systems in solving computational problems, represents a paradigm shift with profound implications for the field of cryptography, particularly in the context of secure financial transactions. Classical cryptographic techniques, such as public-key encryption systems that rely on the computational hardness of problems like integer factorization and discrete logarithms, are foundational to modern financial security architectures. However, the accelerated computational capabilities of quantum systems, driven by Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms, render these traditional cryptographic methods vulnerable to compromise. This paper delves into the potential impact of quantum computing on cryptographic frameworks, emphasizing its disruptive influence on secure communication protocols, authentication systems, and transaction mechanisms within digital financial ecosystems. A comprehensive analysis of quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms, collectively termed post-quantum cryptography (PQC), is presented as a critical countermeasure to these emerging threats. The paper explores lattice-based cryptography, hash-based signatures, code-based encryption, multivariate polynomial cryptography, and isogeny-based cryptographic schemes, evaluating their robustness against quantum adversaries. Through a rigorous examination of these algorithms’ theoretical foundations and practical implementations, the study identifies strengths, limitations, and potential deployment challenges. Special attention is devoted to the trade-offs between computational efficiency, security guarantees, and scalability, which are critical considerations for the widespread adoption of PQC in financial systems. Additionally, the study highlights the transitional challenges posed by integrating post-quantum cryptographic methods into existing infrastructures. Financial institutions, reliant on legacy systems and global interoperability standards, face significant hurdles in adopting quantum-resilient solutions. These include the need for standardized cryptographic protocols, cross-platform compatibility, and resistance to side-channel attacks. The research underscores the urgency of proactive measures to safeguard critical financial systems, including the development of hybrid cryptographic models that incorporate both classical and post-quantum techniques during the transition phase. Furthermore, the role of regulatory frameworks in mandating the adoption of quantum-safe protocols is examined, along with the potential for collaborative efforts among governments, financial institutions, and cryptographic researchers to ensure a coordinated response to the quantum threat landscape. The implications of quantum supremacy extend beyond technical considerations, affecting the trust and stability of global financial systems. This paper provides strategic recommendations for mitigating risks, including the prioritization of research into quantum-resistant algorithms, the establishment of testing environments for post-quantum solutions, and investment in the development of quantum-secure hardware. By leveraging these strategies, financial ecosystems can enhance their resilience against quantum-induced vulnerabilities. The discussion is substantiated with case studies and simulations that evaluate the performance of post-quantum algorithms in real-world financial contexts, illustrating their effectiveness in securing digital transactions against quantum attacks. By bridging the gap between theoretical advancements and practical implementations, this paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on the future of cryptography in the quantum era. Ultimately, the research aims to provide a comprehensive roadmap for securing digital financial ecosystems against the disruptive potential of quantum computing, ensuring the continued reliability and integrity of secure financial transactions in the face of emerging technological challenges.

References

  1. A. Y. Kitaev, "Quantum computations: Algorithms and complexity," Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1993, pp. 32-41.
  2. L. K. Grover, "A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search," Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1996, pp. 212-219.
  3. P. W. Shor, "Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring," Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1994, pp. 124-134.
  4. C. Gentry, "Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices," Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2009, pp. 169-178.
  5. M. Lucamarini et al., "Overcoming the Rate–Distance Limit of Quantum Key Distribution Without Quantum Repeaters," Nature, vol. 557, no. 7705, pp. 400-403, 2018.
  6. H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and B. Qi, "Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution," Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 13, p. 130503, 2012.
  7. V. Scarani et al., "The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distribution," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1301-1350, 2009.
  8. M. Peev et al., "The SECOQC Quantum Key Distribution Network in Vienna," New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 075001, 2009.
  9. D. J. Bernstein, T. Lange, and C. Peters, "Post-quantum cryptography," Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks, 2011, pp. 1-8.
  10. E. M. McGrew, "Quantum-resistant cryptographic signatures," IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 44-52, 2017.
  11. M. Naor and B. Pinkas, "Cryptographic key exchange protocols," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 2544-2555, 2005.
  12. E. J. Friedman, "Quantum computing and public key cryptography," Cryptographic Applications of Quantum Information, 2018, pp. 60-70.
  13. S. C. Kak, "Quantum cryptography: Recent developments and future challenges," International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 159-178, 2015.
  14. R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman, "A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems," Communications of the ACM, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 120-126, 1978.
  15. C. Gentry and S. Halevi, "Implementing Gentry’s fully homomorphic encryption scheme," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1-15, 2010.
  16. NIST, "Post-Quantum Cryptography Project," National Institute of Standards and Technology,
  17. H. L. Wong, "Quantum-resistant public key cryptosystems," Journal of Mathematical Cryptology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2012.
  18. S. Bos and R. T. O'Donnell, "Quantum algorithms and security in financial systems," IEEE Transactions on Computational Finance, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 435-448, 2019.
  19. A. R. Childs, "On the complexity of quantum factoring," Quantum Information and Computation, vol. 9, pp. 13-27, 2009.
  20. L. Chen, A. R. MacDonald, and D. M. Roetteler, "Lattice-based cryptography for quantum-safe communications," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 5332-5345, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-20

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Sachin Dixit, " The Impact of Quantum Supremacy on Cryptography : Implications for Secure Financial Transactions" International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp.611-637, July-August-2020. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2064141