Comparative Analysis of QA Tools For It Project Efficiency

Authors

  • Harish Goud Kola   Independent Researcher, USA

Keywords:

Quality Assurance, IT Project Efficiency, Automated Testing, Defect Detection, Performance Metrics

Abstract

This paper has carried out a comprehensive comparative analysis of Quality Assurance tools and their impact on IT project efficiency. Through systematic reviews of 15 leading quality assurance tools across 50 organizations involving 200 IT professionals, performance metrics, cost-effectiveness, and user satisfaction for each organization are evaluated. The quantifiable and qualitative analyses in the research methodology of projects with different sizes prove that automated testing tools reduce the test time by 60 percent, while integration solutions have enhanced the detection of defects by 45 percent. The findings in this regard prove that the successful implementation of QA tool mainly enhances project outcomes, although it is different from one project to another according to the size, and team capabilities also relate to specific testing requirements. This paper gives organizations needing to choose and then employ QA tools in their development workflow concrete practical insights.

References

  1. Gamido, H.V. and Gamido, M.V., 2019. Comparative review of the features of automated software testing tools. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(5), p.4473.
  2. Paul, J. and Jefferson, F., 2019. A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, p.472525.
  3. Schoper, Y.G., Wald, A., Ingason, H.T. and Fridgeirsson, T.V., 2018. Projectification in Western economies: A comparative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), pp.71-82.
  4. Wang, T., Li, B., Nelson, C.E. and Nabavi, S., 2019. Comparative analysis of differential gene expression analysis tools for single-cell RNA sequencing data. BMC bioinformatics, 20, pp.1-16.
  5. Ferrag, M.A., Maglaras, L., Moschoyiannis, S. and Janicke, H., 2020. Deep learning for cyber security intrusion detection: Approaches, datasets, and comparative study. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 50, p.102419.
  6. Hirsch, F.R., McElhinny, A., Stanforth, D., Ranger-Moore, J., Jansson, M., Kulangara, K., Richardson, W., Towne, P., Hanks, D., Vennapusa, B. and Mistry, A., 2017. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays for lung cancer: results from phase 1 of the blueprint PD-L1 IHC assay comparison project. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 12(2), pp.208-222.
  7. Huovila, A., Bosch, P. and Airaksinen, M., 2019. Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?. Cities, 89, pp.141-153.
  8. Shamshiri, R.R., Hameed, I.A., Pitonakova, L., Weltzien, C., Balasundram, S.K., Yule, I.J., Grift, T.E. and Chowdhary, G., 2018. Simulation software and virtual environments for acceleration of agricultural robotics: Features highlights and performance comparison. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11(4), pp.15-31.
  9. Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N. and Papadopoulos, T., 2017. Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 99, pp.14-33.
  10. Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M.A., Aguilera, R.V. and Verbeke, A., 2020. The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of international business studies, 51, pp.455-466.
  11. Srivastava, S. and Lessmann, S., 2018. A comparative study of LSTM neural networks in forecasting day-ahead global horizontal irradiance with satellite data. Solar Energy, 162, pp.232-247.
  12. Santos, R., Costa, A.A. and Grilo, A., 2017. Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Automation in Construction, 80, pp.118-136.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

Issue

Volume 6, Issue 6, November-December-2020

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Harish Goud Kola , " Comparative Analysis of QA Tools For It Project Efficiency" International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp.419-424, November-December-2020.