Independent Component Analysis for IoT Services Using Machine Learning

Authors

  • N NITHYANANDAM  M. Tech Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jntuacea, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT217264

Keywords:

AI, Machine learning, Independent component Analysis (ICA),BSS, PCA, EEG, ECG.

Abstract

Machine learning is an implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that allows devices to learn and develop independently without having to be directly programmed. Machine learning is concerned with developing computer programmes that can access data and learn on their own. The introduction of the internet has revolutionised the use of machine learning in today's century. The new scheme, which seeks to create a quantifiable trust assessment model, then measures specific confidence qualities numerically. An epic calculation based on AI standards is conceived to portray the separated certainty highlights and join them to deliver a last trust characteristic to be utilized for dynamic. One of the methods used is the Generic Trust Computational Model (GTCM). It's a prototype that displays relevant details about the confidence acquisition and evaluation process using three Trust Metrics (TMs): experience, practise, and reputation. The Machine Learning Model uses the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) calculation, which depends on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), to lessen the N measurements to two for perception purposes. In a number of implementations, Independent Component Analysis (ICA) has outperformed standard PCA. When Principal Component Analysis failed to differentiate eye artefacts from brain signals, particularly when their amplitudes were identical, it was used to exclude them from the ElectroEncephaloGram (EEG).

References

  1. Nunez, P. L. (1981) Electric Fields of the Brain (Oxford Univ. Press, New York).
  2. Scherg, M. & Von Cramon, D. (1986) Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65, 344–360.
  3. Dale, A. M. &Sereno, M. I. (1993) J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 162–176.
  4. Chapman, R. M. & McCrary, J. W. (1995) Brain Lang. 27, 288–301.
  5. Bell, A. J. &Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) Neural Comput. 7, 1129–1159.
  6. Snyder, A. Z., Abdullaev, Y. G., Posner, M. I. &Raichle, M. E. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 1689–1693.
  7. Hillyard, S. A. &Munte, T. F. (1984) Percept. Psychophys. 36, 185–198.
  8. Makeig, S., Bell, A. J., Jung, T.-P. &Sejnowski, T. J. (1996) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, 145–151.
  9. S. Takahashi, Y. Anzai, and Y. Sakurai, “A new approach to spike sorting for multi-neuronal activities recorded with a tetrode— how ICA can be practical,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 265–272, 2003.
  10. A. Tonazzini, E. Salerno, and L. Bedini, “Fast correction of bleed-through distortion in grayscale documents by a blind source separation technique,” International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2007.
  11. T. Ristaniemi and J. Joutsensalo, “Learning algorithms for blind multiuser detection in CDMA downlink,” in Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 3, pp. 1040–1044, September 1998.
  12. L. H. Sibul, M. J. Roan, and J. Erling, “Deconvolution and signal extraction in geophysics and acoustics,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, no. 5, p. 2389, 2002.
  13. L. T. Duarte, R. Lopes, J. H. Faccipieri et al., “Separation of reflection from diffraction events via the CRS technique and a blind source separation method based on sparsity maximization,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, 2013.
  14. B. Rivet, L. Girin, and C. Jutten, “Mixing audiovisual speech processing and blind source separation for the extraction of speech signals from convolutive mixtures,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, vol. 15, no. 1–4, pp. 96–108, 2007. 16H.-M. Park, H.-Y. Jung, T.-W. Lee, and S.-Y. Lee, “Subbandbased blind signal separation for noisy speech recognition,” Electronics Letters, vol. 35, no. 23, pp. 2011–2012, 1999.
  15. A. J. Bell and T. J. Sejnowski, “An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution,” Neural Computation, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1129–1159, 1995.
  16. T.-W. Lee, M. Girolami, and T. J. Sejnowski, “Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources,” Neural Computation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 417–441, 1999.
  17. J. Karvanen, J. Eriksson, and V. Koivunen, “Pearson system based method for blind separation,” in Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA ’00), pp. 585–590, Helsinki, Finland, June 2000. 20J. Karvanen and V. Koivunen, “Blind separation methods based on Pearson system and its extensions,” Signal Processing, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 663–673, 2002.
  18. A. Hyvarinen, “Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for ¨ independent component analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 626–634, 1999.
  19. S. Amari and A. Cichocki, “Adaptive blind signal processing—Neural network approaches,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 86, pp. 2026–2048, Oct. 1998.
  20. A. K. Barros, A. Mansour, and N. Ohnishi, “Adaptive blind elimination of artifacts in ECG signals,” in Proc. 1998 Workshop on Independence and Artificial Neural Networks, Tenerife, Spain, 1998, pp. 1380–1386.
  21. A. K. Barros, R. Vigário, V. Jousmäki, and N. Ohnishi, “Extraction of periodic signals from multi-channel bioelectrical measurements,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 47, pp. 583–588, May 2000.
  22. A. Bell and T. Sejnowski, “An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution,” Neural Computation, vol. 7, pp. 1129–1159, 1995.
  23. S. Blanco, H. Garcia, R. Q. Quiroga, L. Romanelli, and O. A. Rosso, “Stationarity of the EEG series,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol., pp. 395–399, 1995.
  24. J.-F. Cardoso, “Source separation using higher oerder moments,” in Proc. 1989 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP’89), Glasgow, Scotland, 1989, pp. 2109–2112.
  25. Blind signal separation: Statistical principles,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 86, pp. 2009–2025, Oct. 1998.
  26. High-order contrasts for independent component analysis,” Neural Computation, vol. 11, pp. 157–192, 1999.
  27. P. Comon, “Independent component analysis—A new concept?,” Signal Processing, vol. 36, pp. 287–314, 1994.
  28. M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O. V. Lounasmaa, “Magnetoencephalography—Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain,” Rev. Modern Phys., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 413–497, 1993
  29. H.-S. Fang, J. Cao, Y.-W. Tai, and C. Lu. Pairwise body-part attention for recognizing human-object interactions. In ECCV, 2018.
  30. V. Delaitre, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic. Recognizing human actions in still images: a study of bag-of-features and part-based representations. In BMVC, 2010.
  31. Y. W. Chao, Z. Wang, Y. He, J. Wang, and J. Deng. Hico: A benchmark for recognizing human-object interactions in images. In ICCV, 2015.
  32. C.-Y. Chen and K. Grauman. Predicting the location of “interactees” in novel human-object interactions. In ACCV, 2014.
  33. A. Mallya and S. Lazebnik. Learning models for actions and person-object interactions with transfer to question answering. In ECCV, 2016.

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

Issue

Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April-2021

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
N NITHYANANDAM, " Independent Component Analysis for IoT Services Using Machine Learning" International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp.309-316, March-April-2021. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT217264