Data Transmission in Wearable Sensor Network for Human Activity Monitoring using Embedded Classifier technique

Authors

  • Lithin Kumble  School of Computing and IT, REVA University, India
  • Kiran Kumari Patil  School of Computing and IT, REVA University, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT228230

Keywords:

Wireless Sensor Network, Wearable Sensors, Activity Recognition, Lifetime, Energy Con- Sumption, Transmission Suppression, Embedded Machine Learning.

Abstract

The recent development of wireless wearable sensor networks has opened up a slew of new possibilities in industries as diverse as healthcare, medicine, activity monitoring, sports, safety, human-machine interface, and more. The battery-powered sensor nodes' longevity is critical to the technology's success. This research proposes a new strategy for increasing the lifetime of wearable sensor networks by eliminating redundant data transmissions. The proposed solution is based on embedded classifiers that allow sensor nodes to determine whether current sensor readings should be sent to the cluster head. A strategy was developed to train the classifiers, which takes into account the impact of data selection on the accuracy of a recognition system. This method was used to create a wearable sensor network prototype for human monitoring of activity Experiments were carried out in the real world to assess the novel method in terms of network lifetime, energy usage, and human activity recognition accuracy. The proposed strategy allows for a large increase in network lifetime while maintaining excellent activity detection accuracy, according to the results of the experimental evaluation. Experiments have also demonstrated that the technology has advantages over state-of-the-art data transmission reduction strategies.

References

  1. Giannini, P.; Bassani, G.; Avizzano, C.A.; Filippeschi, A. Wearable Sensor Network for Biomechanical Overload Assessment in Manual Material Handling. Sensors 2020, 20, 3877. [CrossRef]
  2. Xu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Yu, Y.; Zeng, H. Improved 1D-CNNs for behavior recognition using wearable sensor network. Comput. Commun. 2020, 151, 165–171. [CrossRef]
  3. Ghasemzadeh, H.; Amini, N.; Saeedi, R.; Sarrafzadeh, M. Power-aware computing in wearable sensor networks: An optimal feature selection. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014, 14, 800–812. [CrossRef]
  4. Jarwan, A.; Sabbah, A.; Ibnkahla, M. Data transmission reduction schemes in WSNs for efficient IoT systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2019, 37, 1307–1324. [CrossRef]
  5. Płaczek, B.; Bernas´, M. Uncertainty-based information extraction in wireless sensor networks for control applications. Ad Hoc Netw. 2014, 14, 106–117. [CrossRef]
  6. Lewandowski, M.; Bernas, M.; Loska, P.; Szymała, P.; Płaczek, B. Extending Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Network in Application to Road Traffic Monitoring. In International Conference on Computer Networks; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 112–126.
  7. Liu, X.; Yu, J.; Li, F.; Lv, W.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, X. Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks: From the Perspective of Security. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 6495–6513 [CrossRef]
  8. Dehkordi, S.A.; Farajzadeh, K.; Rezazadeh, J.; Farahbakhsh, R.; Sandrasegaran, K.; Dehkordi, M.A. A survey on data aggregation techniques in IoT sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 2020, 26, 1243–1263. [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, C.; Li, Z.; Jiang, S.; Jing, W. Delay-constrained data aggregation scheduling in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2017, 13. [CrossRef]
  10. Ghasemzadeh, H.; Jafari, R. Data aggregation in body sensor networks: A power optimization technique for collaborative signal processing. In Proceedings of the 2010 7th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Boston, MA, USA, 21–25 June 2010; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 1–9.
  11. Shen, B.; Fu, J.S. A method of data aggregation for wearable sensor systems. Sensors 2016, 16, 954. [CrossRef]
  12. Raj, A.S.; Chinnadurai, M. Energy efficient routing algorithm in wireless body area networks for smart wearable patches. Comput. Commun. 2020, 153, 85–94.
  13. Lin, J.W.; Liao, S.W.; Leu, F.Y. Sensor data compression using bounded error piecewise linear approximation with resolution reduction. Energies 2019, 12, 2523. [CrossRef]
  14. Pacharaney, U.S.; Gupta, R.K. Clustering and compressive data gathering in wireless sensor network. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2019, 109, 1311–1331. [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, J.; Chen, F.; Wang, D. Data compression based on stacked RBM-AE model for wireless sensor networks. Sensors 2018, 18, 4273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, C.H.; Tseng, Y.C. Data compression by temporal and spatial correlations in a body-area sensor network: A case study in pilates motion recognition. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2010, 10, 1459–1472. [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, L.; Xiong, D.; Guo, L.; Wang, J. A compressed sensing-based wearable sensor network for quantitative assessment of stroke patients. Sensors 2016, 16, 202. [CrossRef]
  18. Natarajan, V.; Vyas, A. Power efficient compressive sensing for continuous monitoring of ECG and PPG in a wearable system. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Reston, VA, USA, 12–14 December 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 336–341.
  19. Huang, H.; Hu, S.; Sun, Y. Energy-efficient ECG compression in wearable body sensor network by leveraging empirical mode decomposition. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 4–7 March 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 149–152.
  20. Lou, P.; Shi, L.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, Z.; Yan, J. A Data-Driven Adaptive Sampling Method Based on Edge Computing. Sensors 2020, 20, 2174. [CrossRef]
  21. Cai, W.; Zhang, M. Spatiotemporal correlation–based adaptive sampling algorithm for clustered wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2018, 14. [CrossRef]
  22. Nguyen, L.; Ulapane, N.; Miro, J.V. Adaptive sampling for spatial prediction in environmental monitoring using wireless sensor networks: A review. In Proceedings of the 2018 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Wuhan, China, 31 May–2 June 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 346–351.
  23. Miskowicz, M. Send-on-delta concept: An event-based data reporting strategy. Sensors 2006, 6, 49–63. [CrossRef]
  24. Diaz-Cacho, M.; Delgado, E.; Barreiro, A.; Falcón, P. Basic send-on-delta sampling for signal tracking-error reduction. Sensors 2017, 17, 312. [CrossRef]
  25. Mesin, L. A neural algorithm for the non-uniform and adaptive sampling of biomedical data. Comput. Biol. Med. 2016, 71, 223–230. [CrossRef]
  26. Rezaie, H.; Ghassemian, M. An adaptive algorithm to improve energy efficiency in wearable activity recognition systems. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 5315–5323. [CrossRef]
  27. Augustyniak, P. Adaptive Sampling of the Electrocardiogram Based on Generalized Perceptual Features. Sensors 2020, 20, 373. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shu, T.; Chen, J.; Bhargava, V.K.; de Silva, C.W. An energy-efficient dual prediction scheme using LMS filter and LSTM in wireless sensor networks for environment monitoring. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 6, 6736–6747. [CrossRef]
  29. Ganjewar, P.; Barani, S.; Wagh, S.J. A hierarchical fractional LMS prediction method for data reduction in a wireless sensor network. Ad Hoc Netw. 2019, 87, 113–127. [CrossRef]
  30. Dias, G.M.; Bellalta, B.; Oechsner, S. A survey about prediction-based data reduction in wireless sensor networks. Acm Comput. Surv. 2016, 49, 1–35. [CrossRef]
  31. Suh, Y.S. Send-on-delta sensor data transmission with a linear predictor. Sensors 2007, 7, 537–547. [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, X.; Zhenzhen, X.; Lin, Y.; Weifeng, S.; Mingchu, L. Prediction-based data transmission for energy conservation in wireless body sensors. In Proceedings of the 2010 The 5th Annual ICST Wireless Internet Conference (WICON), Singapore, 1–3 March 2010; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 1–9.
  33. Mishra, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Li, H.; Agrawal, D.P. Error minimization and energy conservation by predicting data in wireless body sensor networks using artificial neural network and analysis of error. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 11th Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) Las Vegas, NV, USA, 10–13 January 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 165–170.
  34. Mejia, J.; Ochoa-Zezzatti, A.; Cruz-Mejía, O.; Mederos, B. Prediction of time series using wavelet Gaussian process for wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 2020, 26, 5751–5758. [CrossRef]
  35. Putra, I.P.E.S.; Brusey, J.; Gaura, E.; Vesilo, R. An event-triggered machine learning approach for accelerometer-based fall detection. Sensors 2018, 18, 20. [CrossRef]
  36. Pérez-Torres, R.; Torres-Huitzil, C.; Galeana-Zapién, H.A Cognitive-Inspired Event-Based Control for Power-Aware Human Mobility Analysis in IoT Devices. Sensors 2019, 19, 832. [CrossRef]
  37. Socas, R.; Dormido, S.; Dormido, R.; Fabregas, E. Event-based control strategy for mobile robots in wireless environments. Sensors 2015, 15, 30076–30092. [CrossRef]
  38. Ullah, F.; Abdullah, A.H.; Kaiwartya, O.; Kumar, S.; Arshad, M.M. Medium Access Control (MAC) for Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN): Superframe structure, multiple access technique, taxonomy, and challenges. Hum. Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 2017, 7, 34. [CrossRef]
  39. Aderohunmu, F.A.; Paci, G.; Brunelli, D.; Deng, J.D.; Benini, L.; Purvis, M. An application-specific forecasting algorithm for extending wsn lifetime. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA, 20–23 May 2013; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 374–381.
  40. Ignatov, A. Real-time human activity recognition from accelerometer data using Convolutional Neural Networks. Appl. Soft Comput. 2018, 62, 915–922. [CrossRef]
  41. Murad, A.; Pyun, J.Y. Deep recurrent neural networks for human activity recognition. Sensors 2017, 17, 2556. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zubair, M.; Song, K.; Yoon, C. Human activity recognition using wearable accelerometer sensors. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Asia (ICCE-Asia), Seoul, Korea, 26–28 October 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–5.
  43. Zhao, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhao, X.; Peng, C.; Guo, Q.; Wu, B. NaviLight: Indoor localization and navigation under arbitrary lights. In IEEE INFOCOM 2017-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1–4 May 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–9.
  44. Ravi, N.; Iftode, L. FiatLux: Fingerprinting rooms using light intensity. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Toronto, ON, Canada, 13–16 May 2007.
  45. Lewandowski, M.; Płaczek, B. An Event-Aware Cluster-Head Rotation Algorithm for Extending Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Network with Smart Nodes. Sensors 2019, 19, 4060. [CrossRef]
  46. Berthold, M.R.; Cebron, N.; Dill, F.; Gabriel, T.R.; Kötter, T.; Meinl, T.; Ohl, P.; Thiel, K.; Wiswedel, B. KNIME-the Konstanz information miner: Version 2.0 and beyond. ACM Sigkdd Explor. Newsl. 2009, 11, 26–31. [CrossRef]
  47. Berthold, M.R.; Diamond, J. Constructive training of probabilistic neural networks. Neurocomputing 1998, 19, 167–183. [CrossRef]
  48. Fan, R.E.; Chen, P.H.; Lin, C.J. Working set selection using second order information for training support vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2005, 6, 1889–1918.
  49. Chang, C.C.; Lin, C.J. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2011, 2, 1–27. [CrossRef]

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

Issue

Volume 8, Issue 2, March-April-2022

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Lithin Kumble, Kiran Kumari Patil, " Data Transmission in Wearable Sensor Network for Human Activity Monitoring using Embedded Classifier technique " International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp.173-182, March-April-2022. Available at doi : https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT228230