The Views, Likes, Share, Downloads, Ratings of Social Media Network

Authors

  • Jitendra Sunte  Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Lingaraj Appa Engineering College Bidar, India
  • Balaji Jadhav  Lecturer in Chemistry Government PU College Bhalki, India

Keywords:

Likes , Shares , Views, Ratings, Case Study, Disadvantages

Abstract

Now-a-days entire world business, marketing, economy, growth, popularity is depends on ratings from goods and services of industries as well as star ratings of reputed institutions and companies and all business strategies. Also all politicians likes depends on citizens clicks. Further rating helps for good quality of products while purchasing. For smooth services one has to larger views helps to take advantages. Thus popularity means likes ,shares ,downloads views from any social media network which is interdisciplinary, it may be from facebook, whatsapp, instagram, youtube, browsers and so many. Current paper is dealing with some problems, drawbacks involved from media network.

References

  1. Khamis S 2011, ‘The transformative Egyptian media landscape:  changes, challenges and comparative perspectives’, international Journal of Communication 5, pp. 1159–1177
  2. Kaplan, AM & Haenlein, M 2010, ‘Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media’, Business Horizons, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 59–68.
  3. Kaplan, M & Blakley, J 2009, ‘The Business and Culture of Social Media’, viewed 25 September 2011, http://www.learcenter.org/pdf/businessandcultureofsocialmedia.pdf
  4. Kelley, T 2002, The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm, Harper Collins Business, London.
  5. Kietzmann, JH, Hermkens, K, McCarthy, IP & Silvestre, BS 2011, ‘Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media’, Business Horizons, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 241–251.
  6. Kivikuru, U 2005.’The citizen, media and social change in Namibia’, in O Hemer & T Tufte, (eds), Media & Glocal change rethinking communication for development, Publicaciones Cooperativas Buenos Aires.
  7. Langman, L 2005, ‘From virtual public spheres to global justice: a critical theory of interworked social Movements’, Sociological Theory, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 42–74.
  8. O’Reilly, T 2005, ‘What Is Web 2.0’, O’Reilly Network, viewed 27 September 2011, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
  9. Rao, M 2005, ‘The information society: visions and realities in developing countries’, in O Hemer & T Tufte (eds), Media and glocal change: rethinking communication for development, CLACSO, Nordicom, Buenos Aires, Göteborg, pp.271 – 284.
  10. Rodríguez, C 2001, Fissures in the mediascape: an international study of citizens’ media. Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey.
  11. Rosenberry, J & Burton, St J 2010, Public journalism 2.0: the promise and reality of a citizen-engaged press. Routledge, NY.
  12. Salmon, CT, Fernandez, L & Post, LA 2010, ‘Mobilizing public will across borders: roles and functions of communication processes and technologies’, Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 25, no. 3&4, pp. 159–170.
  13. Soltren, J 2005, Facebook: Threats to Privacy, MIT, Massachusetts.
  14. Thorpe, I 2011, ‘8 Uses for social media in aid work’, viewed 23 September 2011, http://kmonadollaraday.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/8-uses-for-social-media-in-aid-work/
  15. Wasserman, H 2007, ‘Is a new worldwide Web possible? An explorative comparison of the use of ICTs  by two South African social movements’, African Studies Review, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 109–131.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Jitendra Sunte, Balaji Jadhav, " The Views, Likes, Share, Downloads, Ratings of Social Media Network, IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp.203-205, July-August-2022.