To Innovative Approach to Personalized Web Service Level for Selecting the Optimal Web Service Applicant

Authors

  • Aishvery Rathore  Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Millennium Institute of Technology and Science, Bhopal, India
  • Prof. Vinod Mahor  Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Millennium Institute of Technology and Science, Bhopal, India

Keywords:

Web Service, Multi-criteria decision making, quality of service and design, service based software system.

Abstract

Web service composition enables developers to build apps. It is widely known that choosing relevant Web services for a composite service that satisfies the developer needs may be difficult and complicated, especially given the Internet's rapidly expanding supply of Web services. The Quality of Service (QoS) is just used as a fundamental criterion to drive the selection process in the bulk of current methods to Web services selection, As a common software development technique, web service composition enables the creation of sophisticated Mashups by skillfully fusing Web services with various functionality. To choose the right Web services to create Web applications that meet functional requirements, however, gets more difficult as the number of Web services grows. A composition pattern aware Web service recommendation approach named EWACP-Deep FM is developed to take user preferences into account when recommending Web services. This method combines the co-occurrence and popularity of Web services with composition patterns between Web services and Mashups. By creating a multidimensional feature matrix, which the depth factorization machine (Deep FM) model then uses to train itself, it is possible to identify potential link relationships between. In this dissertation work based on Web services and Mashup applications and to suggest the Top-N best services for the intended Mashup application. Tests utilizing actual datasets from Programmable Web demonstrate that the suggested strategy works better than others with improved suggestion efficacy and Results from the experiments demonstrate that both strategies outperform those that might be used in a rigorous experimental setting.

References

  1. M. R. Lyu et al., Handbook of software reliability engineering. IEEE computer society press CA, 2021, vol. 222.
  2. L. H. Putnam and W. Myers, Measures for excellence: reliable software on time, within budget. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 2019.
  3. J. D. Musa, A. Iannino, and K. Okumoto, Software reliability: measurement, Innovative, application. McGraw-Hill, Inc 2012.
  4. R. C. Cheung, “A user-oriented software reliability model,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, no. 2, pp. 118–125, 1980.
  5. S. S. Gokhale and K. S. Trivedi, “Reliability Innovative and sensitivity analysis based on software architecture,” in Software Reliability Engineering, 2002. ISSRE 2003. Proceedings. 13th International Symposium on. IEEE, 2002, pp. 64–75.
  6. K. Goševa-Popstojanova and K. S. Trivedi, “Architecture-based approach to reliability assessment of software systems,” Performance Evaluation, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 179–204, 2001.
  7. S. M. Yacoub, B. Cukic, and H. H. Ammar, “Scenario-based reliability analysis of component-based software,” in Software Reliability Engineering, 1999. Proceedings. 10th International Symposium on. IEEE, 1999, pp. 22–31.
  8. V. Grassi and S. Patella, “Reliability Innovative for service-oriented computing environments,” Internet Computing, IEEE, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 43–49, 2006.
  9. L. Cheung, R. Roshandel, N. Medvidovic, and L. Golubchik, “Early Innovative of software component reliability,” in Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering. ACM, 2008, pp. 111–120.
  10. K. Goseva-Popstojanova, A. Hassan, A. Guedem, W. Abdelmoez, D. E. M. Nassar, H. Ammar, and A. Mili, “Architectural-level risk analysis using uml,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 946–960, 2003.
  11. R. H. Reussner, H. W. Schmidt, and I. H. Poernomo, “Reliability Innovative for component- based software architectures,” Journal of systems and software, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 2003.
  12. Z. Zheng and M. R. Lyu, “Collaborative reliability Innovative of service-oriented systems,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering- Volume 1. ACM, 2010, pp. 35–44.
  13. T. Yu, Y. Zhang, and K.-J. Lin, “Efficient algorithms for web services selection with end- to-end qos constraints,” ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), vol. 1, no. 1, p. 6, 2007.
  14. P. A. Bonatti and P. Festa, “On optimal service selection,” in Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2005, pp. 530–538.
  15. L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, A. H. Ngu, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnanam, and H. Chang, “Qos-aware middleware web services composition,” Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 311–327, 2004.
  16. R. Burke, “Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments,” User modeling and user-adapted interaction, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 331–370, 2002.
  17. N. N. Liu and Q. Yang, “Eigenrank: a ranking-oriented approach to collaborative filtering,” in Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2008, pp. 83–90.
  18. C. Yang, B. Wei, J. Wu, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang, “Cares: a ranking-oriented cadal recommender system,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 2009, pp. 203–212.
  19. Z. Zheng, H. Ma, M. R. Lyu, and I. King, “Wsrec: A collaborative filtering based web service recommender system,” in Web Services, 2009. ICWS 2009. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2009, pp. 437–444.
  20. K. Järvelin and J. Kekäläinen, “Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 422–446, 2002.
  21. P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl, “Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews,” in Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 1994, pp. 175–186.
  22. Z. Zheng, Y. Zhang, and M. R. Lyu, “Cloudrank: A qos-driven component ranking framework for cloud computing,” in Reliable Distributed Systems, 2010 29th IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 184–193.
  23. Waseem Ahmed, Yongwei Wu,WeiminZheng, ”Response Time Based Optimal Web service Selection”, VOL. 26 NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2015

IInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December-2022

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) IJSRCSEIT

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
Aishvery Rathore, Prof. Vinod Mahor, " To Innovative Approach to Personalized Web Service Level for Selecting the Optimal Web Service Applicant" International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology(IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp.476-483, November-December-2022.