Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning in Healthcare - A Secure AI Framework

Authors

  • Bhavani Sankar Telaprolu Computer Systems and Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2410347

Keywords:

Privacy-Preserving AI, Federated Learning, Secure Multi-Party Computation, Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Healthcare AI

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) has transformed AI applications in healthcare by enabling collaborative model training across multiple institutions while preserving patient data privacy. Despite its advantages, FL remains susceptible to security vulnerabilities, including model inversion attacks, adversarial data poisoning, and communication inefficiencies, necessitating enhanced privacy-preserving mechanisms. In response, this study introduces Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning (PPFL), an advanced FL framework integrating Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC), Differential Privacy (DP), and Homomorphic Encryption (HE) to ensure data confidentiality while maintaining computational efficiency. I rigorously evaluate PPFL using Federated Averaging (FedAvg), Secure Aggregation (SecAgg), and Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) across real-world healthcare datasets. The results indicate that this approach achieves up to an 85% reduction in model inversion attack success rates, enhances privacy efficiency by 30%, and maintains accuracy retention between 95.2% and 98.3%, significantly improving security without compromising model performance. Furthermore, comparative visual analyses illustrate trade-offs between privacy and accuracy, scalability trends, and computational overhead. This study also explores scalability challenges, computational trade-offs, and real-world deployment considerations in multi-institutional hospital networks, paving the way for secure, scalable, and privacy-preserving AI adoption in healthcare environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

McMahan, B. et al. 2017. Proceedings of the 20th AISTATS. (2017), DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1710.06963

Dwork, C. 2008. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation. (2008), DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-79228-4_1

Bonawitz, K. et al. 2020. Proceedings of the 3rd MLSys Conference. (2020), DOI:10.1145/3404397.3404477

Shokri, R. et al. 2017. IEEE Security & Privacy. (2017), DOI:10.1109/SP.2017.41

Brisimi, T. S. et al. 2020. npj Digital Medicine. (2020), DOI:10.1038/s41746-019-0212-4

Goldberger, A. L. et al. 2000. Circulation. (2000), DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215

Yang, Q. et al. 2019. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. (2019), DOI:10.1145/3298981

Hardy, S. et al. 2017. arXiv preprint. (2017), DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1711.10677

Kairouz, P. et al. 2021. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning. (2021), DOI:10.1561/2200000083

Hynes, N. et al. 2018. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Systems and ML. (2018), DOI:10.1145/3298981

Rieke, N. et al. 2020. npj Digital Medicine. (2020), DOI:10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1

Liu, Y. et al. 2022. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. (2022), DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2021.3124607

Xu, J. et al. 2021. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. (2021), DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103833

Sheller, M. J. et al. 2020. Scientific Reports. (2020), DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-69250-9

Dayan, I. et al. 2021. Nature Medicine. (2021), DOI:10.1038/s41591-021-01506-3

Downloads

Published

16-06-2024

Issue

Section

Research Articles