Mitigating Critical Challenges in Java Production Environments: Memory Leaks, Dependency Conflicts, and Performance Optimization in Enterprise Systems

Authors

  • Sai Santosh Goud Bandari Tata Consultancy Services, Morrisville, NC, United States Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2425481

Keywords:

Java, Production Support, Memory Leaks, Garbage Collection, Concurrency Issues, Threading Problems, Dependency Management, System Performance, Monitoring Tools

Abstract

Java is one of the most extensively used programming languages in the industry, recognized for its simplicity, robustness, scalability, and platform independence. It is capable of managing complex environments, making it a preferred choice for mission-critical systems in diverse sectors such as healthcare, insurance, banking, finance, and e-commerce. However, despite its many advantages, Java applications in production environments often encounter significant challenges that can impact system operations, reduce efficiency, and lead to prolonged downtime. These challenges include memory management issues, integration difficulties with external dependencies, and concurrency problems such as threading issues.

One of the most prevalent issues faced in Java production support is memory leaks. Memory leaks occur when memory that is no longer needed is not properly released by the system, often due to inefficient garbage collection or poor memory management practices. This can result in increased memory usage over time, leading to performance degradation, system crashes, or even application shutdowns. Similarly, poor coding practices can lead to further complications, such as the failure of scheduled jobs or inaccurate calculations, which often require manual intervention and SQL query Troubleshooting and Optimization.

Another significant challenge is dependency management conflicts, particularly in large-scale Java applications that use microservices architecture in Java. The widespread use of third-party libraries and frameworks often introduces compatibility issues, version mismatches, and integration failures, making debugging and resolution increasingly difficult in a production environment. These dependency conflicts can have severe consequences on system stability and performance, leading to system outages or other disruptions.

This paper explores the various challenges encountered in Java production support and discusses their real-world implications. For example, issues in payment processing systems in banking applications, such as deadlocks, have been mitigated through granular locking mechanisms. The study also delves into the advanced tools and frameworks available for monitoring and optimizing Java performance in production environments. Tools such as Dynatrace for CPU monitoring, Splunk for error log analysis, AppDynamics for application performance monitoring, and Eclipse Memory Analyzer for detecting memory leaks are critical in diagnosing and resolving production issues efficiently.

By analyzing case studies and leveraging these monitoring tools, this paper highlights how organizations can proactively identify and resolve production issues, thus minimizing downtime and maintaining business continuity. ServiceNow is commonly used in production environments to categorize incidents based on priority and ensure resolution within defined service-level agreements (SLAs). The ultimate goal of production support is to shift from a reactive approach to a proactive one, ensuring that production environments run smoothly and disruptions are minimized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Williams and L. Davis, "Java Applications for Seamless User Experiences," Journal of Software Development and User Experience, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 145-159, May 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.jsduexperience.org/java-optimization-seamless. [Accessed: 12-Feb-2025].

D. Sharma and P. Kumar, "Increase CPU Utilization," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1894-1903, Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/xyz123. [Accessed: 12-Feb-2025].

P. Lee and R. Patel, "Efficiency of Garbage Collection in Java Virtual Machines," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 654-667, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/xyz456. [Accessed: 12-Feb-2025].

A. Gupta and M. Kumar, "Emerging Trends and Evolving Business Needs,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 3520-3532, Feb. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/xyz789. [Accessed: 12-Feb-2025].

S. S. Goud, " improve customer satisfaction ResearchGate, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388722804_Exploring_java_form_AI_-_powered_chatbots_in_the_insurance_industry. [Accessed: 12-Feb-2025].

M. Ghanavati, A. Mesbah, and K. Pattabiraman, "Automated detection of memory leaks in JavaScript web applications," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 648-667, Jul. 2019.

X. Li, J. Liu, and H. Xu, "DJXPerf: A lightweight object-centric Java memory profiler," arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.03388, 2021.

Downloads

Published

20-12-2024

Issue

Section

Research Articles