Addressing Algorithmic Bias in Statistical Models: Integrating Technical Solutions with Ethical Governance for Fair AI Systems

Authors

  • Ranjeet Sharma Tata Consultancy Services, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT251112316

Keywords:

Algorithmic Bias, Statistical Models, Fairness-Aware Machine Learning, Ethical AI, Bias Mitigation, Model Auditing, Artificial Intelligence, Demographic Parity

Abstract

Recent advancements in machine learning and artificial intelligence have led to the widespread deployment of statistical models across critical decision-making domains, raising significant concerns about algorithmic bias and its societal implications. This comprehensive article examines the multifaceted nature of bias in statistical models, from its origins in data collection and model architecture to its manifestation in real-world applications such as hiring, lending, and criminal justice systems. Through analysis of contemporary case studies and emerging research, it presents a systematic framework for detecting and measuring algorithmic bias, alongside practical strategies for its mitigation. The article introduces novel approaches to fairness-aware machine learning, emphasizing the importance of representative data collection and regular model auditing across demographic groups. This article demonstrates that effective bias mitigation requires a holistic approach combining technical solutions with robust ethical guidelines and regulatory compliance. Furthermore, it explores the legal and organizational responsibilities of developing and deploying fair statistical models, providing actionable insights for practitioners and policymakers. This article contributes to the growing body of literature on algorithmic fairness while offering practical solutions for organizations striving to build more equitable AI systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Schwartz et al., "Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence," NIST Special Publication, March 2022. [Online]. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.1270.pdf

Arash Fouman Ajirlou et al., "A Machine Learning Pipeline Stage for Adaptive Frequency Adjustment," IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, vol. 71, no. 3, March 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9351730

Zhiqiang Gong et al., "Diversity in Machine Learning," arXiv:1807.01477v2, 15 May 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.01477

Solon Barocas et al., "Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities," Feb. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.myecole.it/biblio/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2020-Fairness-book.pdf

Michael Kearns et al., "An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning," arXiv:1808.08166, 24 Aug. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08166

Cynthia. Dwork and Christina. Ilvento, "Fairness Under Composition," arXiv:1806.06122, 20 Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06122

Jongin Lim, et al., "BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model Debiasing," CVF Open Access, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2023/papers/Lim_BiasAdv_Bias-Adversarial_Augmentation_for_Model_Debiasing_CVPR_2023_paper.pdf

Jixue Liu et al., "FairMod: Making Predictive Models Discrimination Aware", ResearchGate, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328758650_FairMod_-_Making_Predictive_Models_Discrimination_Aware

Franziska Koefer et al., "Fairness in algorithmic decision systems: a microfinance perspective," European Investment Fund Research and Market Analysis, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.eif.org/news_centre/publications/eif_working_paper_2023_88.pdf

Reed T. Sutton et al., "An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success," NPJ Digital Medicine, 06 February 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-0221-y

Stevens Cadet et al., "Global AI Policy and Regulation," ResearchGate, April 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380402163_Global_AI_Policy_and_Regulation

Jakob Mökander et al., "Challenges and Best Practices in Corporate AI Governance:Lessons from the Biopharmaceutical Industry," arXiv:2407.05339, 7 July 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05339

Berkeley HAAS, "Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence," University of California Berkeley. [Online]. Available: https://haas.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/UCB_Playbook_R10_V2_spreads2.pdf

Chloé Bakalar et al., "A Systematic Analysis of Algorithmic Fairness Implementation in Practice," arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06172, 24 March 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.06172

National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)," NIST AI 100-1, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/nist.ai.100-1.pdf

Moritz Hardt et al., "Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning," arXiv:1610.02413, 7 Oct. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02413

Downloads

Published

18-02-2025

Issue

Section

Research Articles