AI-Driven Predictive Modeling for Real-Time Seismic Activity Monitoring and Earthquake Risk Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT25112769Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Earthquake Risk Assessment, Seismic Monitoring, Deep Learning, Predictive ModelingAbstract
Real-time seismic activity monitoring and earthquake risk assessment have long been critical aspects of disaster mitigation and urban resilience planning. Traditional models based on statistical or geophysical methods often fail to capture the complexity and dynamic nature of seismic phenomena. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), has revolutionized predictive modeling by enabling data-driven approaches for seismic signal analysis, ground motion prediction, and structural vulnerability assessment. This review paper presents a comprehensive synthesis of recent advancements in AI-driven seismic risk models, emphasizing their capacity for real-time forecasting and rapid decision-making. We examine state-of-the-art frameworks that integrate heterogeneous datasets—including geospatial, sensor-based, and historical seismic data—for enhanced situational awareness. The review also identifies the methodological strengths, comparative efficiencies, and current limitations of various AI techniques in earthquake risk analysis. Moreover, we highlight significant research gaps, such as model interpretability and integration with IoT-based monitoring systems, while discussing challenges like data sparsity, model generalization, and real-time computational constraints. A detailed comparative study and summary of recent works provide clarity on prevailing trends. We conclude by outlining future research directions involving hybrid AI models, high-resolution sensing, and multi-hazard frameworks. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers focused on advancing earthquake preparations using cutting-edge AI innovations.
Downloads
References
Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and J. Kang, “Seismic Risk Assessment Method of Underground Space Based on Fuzzy Evaluation Method,” in Smart Infrastructures in the IoT Era, Springer, 2025, pp. 545–554.
C. Li, C. Guo, X. Zhang, X. Li, and Y. Yan, “Seismic landslide risk assessment based on landslide density optimized Newmark model: new insights from the Xianshuihe fault zone in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 84, no. 2, p. 56, 2025.
A. Nettis, V. M. Di Mucci, S. Ruggieri, and G. Uva, “Seismic fragility and risk assessment of isolated bridges subjected to pre-existing ground displacements,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 194, p. 109335, 2025.
Q. Cheng, H. Ren, X. Meng, A. Li, and L. Xie, “Real-time seismic response prediction method of high-rise buildings based on deep learning for earthquake early warning,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 119, p. 105294, 2025.
C. Martino, P. Cantiello, and R. Peluso, “Near-Real-Time Event-Driven System for Calculating Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) in Earthquake-Affected Areas: A Critical Tool for Seismic Risk Management in the Campi Flegrei Area,” GeoHazards, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 8, 2025.
M. L. Sousa and G. Tsionis, “National seismic risk assessment: an overview and practical guide,” Natural Hazards, pp. 1–34, 2025.
J. Zhang, T. Wen, and W. Zheng, “Investigation, monitoring, stability, and risk assessment of geohazards,” Frontiers in Earth Science, vol. 13. Frontiers Media SA, p. 1552845, 2025.
S.-Q. Li, J.-C. Han, Y.-R. Li, and P.-F. Qin, “Intelligent prediction and evaluation models for the seismic risk and vulnerability of reinforced concrete girder bridges in large-scale zones,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 256, p. 110743, 2025.
J. Li et al., “Application of artificial intelligence technology in the study of anthropogenic earthquakes: a review,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1–42, 2025.
I. Grigoratos et al., “A generic seismic risk protocol for energy production sites,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1–23, 2025.
S.-Q. Li, “Seismic risk model for regional buildings that considers the influence of temperature and intensity measures,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 250, p. 123962, 2024.
I. Iervolino et al., “Seismic risk mitigation at Campi Flegrei in volcanic unrest,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024.
S.-Q. Li and Y.-S. Chen, “Seismic risk estimation of composite structures considering improved vulnerability levels,” in Structures, 2024, vol. 65, p. 106645.
P. Debnath et al., “Seismic activity analysis in California: patterns, trends, and predictive modeling,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 50–60, 2024.
A. Ziraoui, B. Kissi, H. Aaya, and I. Azdine, “Monitoring Seismic Activity and Implementing Risk Reduction Strategies in Morocco.,” International Journal on Engineering Applications, vol. 12, no. 4, 2024.
W. Sun, E. Wang, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, and J. Qiu, “Mining-Induced Earthquake Risk Assessment and Control Strategy Based on Microseismic and Stress Monitoring: A Case Study of Chengyang Coal Mine.,” Applied Sciences (2076-3417), vol. 14, no. 24, 2024.
A. Ismail, A. S. A. Rashid, T. Amhadi, R. Nazir, M. Irsyam, and L. Faizal, “Exploring the evolution of seismic hazard and risk assessment research: a bibliometric analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 2687, 2024.
M. Ibrahim and B. Al-Bander, “An integrated approach for understanding global earthquake patterns and enhancing seismic risk assessment,” International Journal of Information Technology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2001–2014, 2024.
V. Plevris, “AI-driven innovations in earthquake risk mitigation: a future-focused perspective,” Geosciences, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 244, 2024.
B. Asare-Bediako, C. D. Boateng, N. Opoku, S. K. Danuor, L. N. B. Arthur, and Y. M. Anokwa, “Seismic activities in Ghana: A systematic review,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 10, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.