Concept-Based Explainable AI: Interpreting Deep Learning Models through Human-Readable Concepts in Financial Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT25112858Abstract
In high-stakes domains like finance, the interpretability of deep learning models is crucial. Concept-Based Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged as a promising approach to bridge the gap between complex neural networks and human understanding by explaining model decisions in terms of human-readable concepts rather than low-level featuresxaiworldconference.com. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of concept-based XAI techniques and their application in finance, including credit risk scoring, fraud detection, and portfolio management. We survey relevant literature – with particular emphasis on recent work by Chaudhari and colleagues – and discuss how concepts (e.g., “credit history quality” or “transaction anomaly patterns”) can be used to interpret deep models. We describe methodologies such as Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)arxiv.org and concept bottleneck modelsproceedings.mlr.press, and propose a conceptual framework for integrating domain-specific concepts into financial deep learning models. Experiments drawing on existing studies and hypothetical simulations demonstrate that concept-based explanations can illuminate model reasoning without significantly sacrificing predictive performance. For instance, concept-enhanced fraud detection models maintain high accuracy while providing clear explanations for flagged transactions, thus improving user trust and meeting regulatory requirements for transparencyjrtcse.comarxiv.org. We present a case study with results showing improved fraud detection (F1-score 0.82 vs 0.60) when using enriched data and XAI techniquesjrtcse.com. We also include a conceptual diagram of a concept-based model pipeline and a performance comparison table. Our contribution is a detailed synthesis of concept-based XAI in finance, highlighting theoretical underpinnings, practical implementation considerations, and the potential for these methods to foster more transparent and accountable AI systems in financial services.
Downloads
References
Chaudhari, A. V. (2025). AI-powered alternative credit scoring platform. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13191.92325
Chaudhari, A. V. (2025). A cloud-native unified platform for real-time fraud detection. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19902.80962
Chaudhari, A. V., & Charate, P. A. (2024). Data Warehousing for IoT Analytics. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 11(6), 311–320
Chaudhari, A. V., & Charate, P. A. (2025). AI-Driven Data Warehousing in Real-Time Business Intelligence: A Framework for Automated ETL, Predictive Analytics, and Cloud Integration, International Journal of Research Culture Society (IJRCS), 9(3), 185–189
Adebayo, J., et al. (2018). Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps. NeurIPS. (Demonstrated limitations of gradient-based explanations)
Angelov, P., & Soares, E. (2020). Towards Explainable Deep Neural Networks (xDNN). IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(11), 4790-4803. (Discusses human-centric prototype-based reasoning)
Bien, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2011). Prototype Selection for Interpretable Classification. Annals of Applied Statistics, 5(4), 2403-2424. (Early work on prototypes aligning with human understanding)
Chaudhari, A. V., & Charate, P. A. (2025a). Synthetic Financial Document Generation and Fraud Detection Using Generative AI and Explainable ML. Journal of Recent Trends in Computer Science and Engineering (JRTCSE), 13(2), 45-59jrtcse.com. (Introduced synthetic data to improve fraud detection and used XAI for interpretations)
Chaudhari, A. V., & Charate, P. A. (2025b). Autonomous AI Agents for Real-Time Financial Transaction Monitoring and Anomaly Resolution Using Multi-Agent RL and Explainable Causal Inference. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology (IJARIIT), 11(2)ijariit.com. (Proposed a fraud detection framework combining reinforcement learning with a causal explainability module)
Chaudhari, A. V., & Charate, P. A. (2025c). Self-Evolving AI Agents for Financial Risk Prediction Using Continual Learning and Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning. JRTCSE, 13(2), 76-92jrtcse.com. (Discussed integration of symbolic knowledge in financial risk models, aligning with concept-based reasoning)
Dominici, G., et al. (2025). Causal Concept Graph Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learning. In ICLR 2025 (Poster). (Introduces causal graph of concepts for interpretable models)
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv:1702.08608arxiv.org. (Argues for human-oriented evaluation of interpretability)
Gilpin, L., et al. (2018). Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning. In IEEE DSAA. (General survey of XAI methods and challenges)
Hassabis, D., et al. (2017). Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence. Neuron, 95(2), 245-258arxiv.org. (Perspective on human-like reasoning in AI)
Hooker, S., et al. (2019). A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks. NeurIPSmedium.com. (Showed limitations of feature importance under parameter randomization)
Koh, P. W., et al. (2020). Concept Bottleneck Models. In Proceedings of ICML 37 (pp. 5338-5348)proceedings.mlr.press. (Introduced and evaluated concept bottleneck architecture)
Chen, J., et al. (2020). Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognition. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 772–782. (Presented concept whitening technique to align latent space with concepts)
Rasheed, B., et al. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Conceptual Bottlenecks on Adversarial Robustness of DNNs. IEEE Access, 12, 131323-131335. (Studied how concept bottlenecks affect robustness, included Figure 1 concept architecture diagram)
Weerts, H., et al. (2023). XAI for Credit Risk: From Global Explanations to Local Decisions. Finance and Technology, 12(1), 33-47arxiv.org. (Examined the role of XAI in credit scoring models for providers and consumers)
EU Artificial Intelligence Act. (2023). Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence. European Commissionmedium.com. (Proposed legislation emphasizing transparency in high-risk AI systems)
Kim, B., et al. (2018). Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV). ICML 2018arxiv.org. (Proposed TCAV method to quantify concept importance in neural nets)
Saeed, A., & Omlin, C. (2023). On the Limitations of Feature Importance: From Local Explanations to Global Understanding. arXiv. (Discussed need for higher-level explanations beyond feature attributions)
(Additional references omitted for brevity) – including other XAI surveys, finance-specific XAI applications, and prototype learning methods.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.