A Review: Automated Testing of Object Oriented Modules Using ML Unit Tool
Keywords:
Software testing, Automated Testing, Manual TestingAbstract
The field of testing has been the subject of a great number of inquiries; nevertheless, the conventional research methods suffer from the drawbacks of having a limited scope and being inflexible It is important to test both manually and automatically, thus it is necessary to look at object-oriented modules both ways. Therefore, in the case of both procedural and object-oriented systems, it is necessary to investigate both manual and automated testing methods. More up-front engineering is desperately needed in the modern embedded software development process. The car industry has performed almost little preliminary testing. The advent of executable modeling tools like ML Unit makes pre-production testing more practical The research will include looking at previous work that has been done in the field of automated testing and considering the role that Matlab plays in both automated and manual testing. During the testing phase, we are focused on the procedural and object-centric modules, and we are looking at the problems that are connected with the traditional testing system, such as its inability to scale and its lack of flexibility. In addition, we are examining the challenges that are caused by the conventional testing system.
Downloads
References
F. Okezie et al. ) Presented a analysis of the software testing tools (2024) Conference Series 1378 (2019) 042030 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1378/4/042030
Harpreet Kaur et al. (2024) presented a comparative investigation of the various existing tools. such as Selenium, HP QTP and TestComplete. ( 2024)
A. Malik and A. Mehta, “Automation Testing,” Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci. www.irjmets.com @International Res. J. Mod. Eng., no. 06, pp. 2582–5208, 2022, [Online]. Available: www.irjmets.com
Advaith Aditya Chevuturu et al., “A Comparative Survey on Software Testing Tools,” Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 32–40, 2022, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.f3664.0811622.
F. Gurcan, G. G. M. Dalveren, N. E. Cagiltay, D. Roman, and A. Soylu, “Evolution of Software Testing Strategies and Trends: Semantic Content Analysis of Software Research Corpus of the Last 40 Years,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, no. September, pp. 106093–106109, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3211949.
A. Jain, “An Analysis of Software Testing Methodologies and Automation Testing,” vol. 11, no. April, pp. 476–480, 2022.
R. Mischke, K. Schaffert, D. Schneider, and A. Weinert, “Automated and Manual Testing in the Development of the Research Software RCE,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 13353 LNCS, pp. 531–544, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08760-8_44.
D. S. N, S. D. S, D. Vijayasree, N. S. Roopa, and A. Arun, “A Review on the Process of Automated Software Testing,” no. September, 2022, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2209.03069.
R. Chourasiya, “Employment Opportunities in Solar Energy Sector,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Commun. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1046–1053, 2021, doi: 10.48175/568.
S. D. R. Konreddy, “The Impact of NLP on Software Testing,” J. Univ. Shanghai Sci. Technol., vol. 23, no. 08, pp. 295–304, 2021, doi: 10.51201/jusst/21/08380.
S. Reine De Reanzi and P. Ranjit Jeba Thangaiah, “A survey on software test automation return on investment, in organizations predominantly from Bengaluru, India,” Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., vol. 13, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1177/18479790211062044.
N. Tiwari, P. Agrawal, M. Chouhan, and H. Kag, “A SURVEY ON SELENIUM AUTOMATION,” vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3975–3984, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.