Conceptual Framework for Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to Climate-Resilient Infrastructure Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT251134104Keywords:
Conceptual Framework, Cross-Disciplinary Approaches, Climate-Resilient Infrastructure, Sustainable Development, Risk Assessment, Adaptive Design, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Policy Integration, Environmental Impact, Urban PlanningAbstract
Climate change poses unprecedented challenges to infrastructure systems worldwide, increasing vulnerability to extreme weather events, sea level rise, and resource stress. Addressing these risks requires not only innovative engineering but also holistic, cross-disciplinary approaches that integrate technical, environmental, socio-economic, and governance perspectives. This proposes a conceptual framework for cross-disciplinary approaches to climate-resilient infrastructure development, emphasizing the integration of diverse fields including civil engineering, environmental science, urban planning, economics, and social sciences. The framework is grounded in resilience theory, systems thinking, and collaborative governance, enabling a comprehensive understanding of infrastructure as part of an interconnected socio-ecological-technical system. The model identifies five core dimensions: technical, environmental, socio-economic, policy and governance, and knowledge and data. The technical dimension addresses climate-responsive design, material innovation, and adaptive engineering practices. The environmental dimension highlights ecosystem-based strategies and nature-based solutions that complement gray infrastructure. Socio-economic considerations ensure that resilience measures are equitable, cost-effective, and inclusive, accounting for community needs and long-term value. Policy and governance structures provide the regulatory backbone, aligning national adaptation strategies with global agreements such as the Paris Accord and the Sustainable Development Goals. Finally, the knowledge and data dimension emphasizes the role of digital twins, climate models, and knowledge-sharing platforms in supporting evidence-based decision-making. The proposed framework underscores the dynamic interactions between these dimensions, facilitated by feedback loops, participatory mechanisms, and adaptive management strategies. By bridging disciplinary silos, it offers a pathway for designing, implementing, and governing infrastructure that is both climate-resilient and socially responsive. Future directions include leveraging artificial intelligence for predictive climate risk assessment, blockchain for transparency in resilience financing, and global best-practice adoption to harmonize standards. This framework contributes to advancing integrated, future-oriented approaches for sustainable infrastructure development in the face of climate uncertainty.
📊 Article Downloads
References
Abrahams, C., Delport, H., Perold, R., Weber, A.M. and Brown, J.B., 2021. Being-in-context through live projects: including situated knowledge in community engagement projects. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 9(SI), pp.99-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v9iSI.337
Adepoju, A.H., Eweje, A., Collins, A. and Hamza, O., 2023. Developing strategic roadmaps for data-driven organizations: A model for aligning projects with business goals. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(6), pp.1128-1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2023.4.6.1128-1140
Afieroho, U.E., Li, Y., Han, Y., Soomro, M.A. and Radujkovic, M., 2023. Transformational community engagement in Urban infrastructure public-private partnerships: a governmentality approach to create social value. Buildings, 13(5), p.1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051225
Alahi, M.E.E., Sukkuea, A., Tina, F.W., Nag, A., Kurdthongmee, W., Suwannarat, K. and Mukhopadhyay, S.C., 2023. Integration of IoT-enabled technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) for smart city scenario: recent advancements and future trends. Sensors, 23(11), p.5206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115206
Ali, A.H. and Thakkar, R., 2023. Climate changes through data science: understanding and mitigating environmental crisis. Mesopotamian Journal of Big Data, 2023, pp.125-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58496/MJBD/2023/017
Ali, Z. and Ramirez, S., 2023. Bridging Disciplines: Interdisciplinary Insights from the Research Consortium Archive. Research Consortium Archive, 1(02), pp.78-88.
Allen, C., Malekpour, S. and Mintrom, M., 2023. Cross‐scale, cross‐level and multi‐actor governance of transformations toward the sustainable development goals: A review of common challenges and solutions. Sustainable Development, 31(3), pp.1250-1267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2495
Argyroudis, S.A., Mitoulis, S.A., Chatzi, E., Baker, J.W., Brilakis, I., Gkoumas, K., Vousdoukas, M., Hynes, W., Carluccio, S., Keou, O. and Frangopol, D.M., 2022. Digital technologies can enhance climate resilience of critical infrastructure. Climate Risk Management, 35, p.100387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100387
Armenia, S. and Loia, F., 2022. Integrating big data analytics, systems thinking and viable systems approach towards a shift from individual to collective intelligence and collective knowledge systems. puntOorg International Journal, 7(1), pp.62-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19245/25.05.pij.7.1.7
Arslan, A., Golgeci, I., Khan, Z., Al-Tabbaa, O. and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., 2021. Adaptive learning in cross-sector collaboration during global emergency: conceptual insights in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Multinational Business Review, 29(1), pp.21-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-07-2020-0153
Asadzadeh, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R., Sharifi, A., Salehi, P. and Kötter, T., 2022. Transformative resilience: An overview of its structure, evolution, and trends. Sustainability, 14(22), p.15267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215267
Askar, R., Bragança, L. and Gervásio, H., 2021. Adaptability of buildings: a critical review on the concept evolution. Applied sciences, 11(10), p.4483.
Askar, R., Bragança, L. and Gervásio, H., 2021. Adaptability of buildings: a critical review on the concept evolution. Applied sciences, 11(10), p.4483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104483
Behnassi, M., Gupta, H., Ramachandran, N., Winniefridah, M., Ramachandran, G., Lakeman, S. and Ashfaq, M., 2021. Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Governance and Resilience Building: Linkages, Knowledge, Inclusiveness, and Regulation. In Social-Ecological Systems (SES) From Risks and Insecurity to Viability and Resilience (pp. 1-37). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76247-6_1
Bhattacharya, A., Ivanyna, M., Oman, W. and Stern, N., 2021. Climate action to unlock the inclusive growth story of the 21st century. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513573366.001
Bibri, S.E., 2021. Data-driven smart eco-cities and sustainable integrated districts: A best-evidence synthesis approach to an extensive literature review. European Journal of Futures Research, 9(1), p.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4
Buhl, M. and Markolf, S., 2023. A review of emerging strategies for incorporating climate change considerations into infrastructure planning, design, and decision making. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 8(sup1), pp.157-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2022.2134646
Charlesworth, E. and Fien, J., 2022. Design and disaster resilience: Toward a role for design in disaster mitigation and recovery. Architecture, 2(2), pp.292-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2020017
Chinamanagonda, S., 2023. Focus on resilience engineering in cloud services. Academia Nexus Journal, 2(1).
Croese, S., Oloko, M., Simon, D. and Valencia, S.C., 2021. Bringing the global to the local: The challenges of multi-level governance for global policy implementation in Africa. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(3), pp.435-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335
Dube, B., 2021. Why cross and mix disciplines and methodologies?: Multiple meanings of Interdisciplinarity and pluralism in ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 179, p.106827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106827
Edler, J., Karaulova, M. and Barker, K., 2022. Understanding conceptual impact of scientific knowledge on policy: The role of policymaking conditions. Minerva, 60(2), pp.209-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09459-8
Eicken, H., Danielsen, F., Sam, J.M., Fidel, M., Johnson, N., Poulsen, M.K., Lee, O.A., Spellman, K.V., Iversen, L., Pulsifer, P. and Enghoff, M., 2021. Connecting top-down and bottom-up approaches in environmental observing. BioScience, 71(5), pp.467-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab018
Fernandes, S., Sheeja, M.S. and Parivara, S., 2023, September. Cultivating Synergistic Global Leadership: Unifying Scientific Acumen for Effective Global Problem Solving. In International Conference on Science, Engineering Management and Information Technology (pp. 294-305). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72287-5_18
Gaisie, E. and Cobbinah, P.B., 2023. Planning for context-based climate adaptation: Flood management inquiry in Accra. Environmental Science & Policy, 141, pp.97-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.01.002
Gebel, A.C., Kachi, A. and Sidner, L., 2022. Aligning finance flows with the Paris Agreement: the role of multilateral development banks. In Handbook of international climate finance (pp. 256-292). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715656.00019
Gluckman, P.D., Bardsley, A. and Kaiser, M., 2021. Brokerage at the science–policy interface: from conceptual framework to practical guidance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), pp.1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00756-3
Haque, C.E. and Doberstein, B., 2021. Adaptive governance and community resilience to cyclones in coastal Bangladesh: Addressing the problem of fit, social learning, and institutional collaboration. Environmental Science & Policy, 124, pp.580-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.007
Hariram, N.P., Mekha, K.B., Suganthan, V. and Sudhakar, K., 2023. Sustainalism: An integrated socio-economic-environmental model to address sustainable development and sustainability. Sustainability, 15(13), p.10682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310682
Horry, R., Booth, C.A., Mahamadu, A.M., Manu, P. and Georgakis, P., 2022. Environmental management systems in the architectural, engineering and construction sectors: a roadmap to aid the delivery of the sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(9), pp.10585-10615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01874-3
Howarth, C., Lane, M., Morse-Jones, S., Brooks, K. and Viner, D., 2022. The ‘co’in co-production of climate action: challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice. Global Environmental Change, 72, p.102445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102445
Kaewunruen, S., AbdelHadi, M., Kongpuang, M., Pansuk, W. and Remennikov, A.M., 2022. Digital twins for managing railway bridge maintenance, resilience, and climate change adaptation. Sensors, 23(1), p.252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010252
Kashef, M., Visvizi, A. and Troisi, O., 2021. Smart city as a smart service system: Human-computer interaction and smart city surveillance systems. Computers in human behavior, 124, p.106923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106923
Ku, S.T.H. and Zehr, S., 2022. Disciplining interdisciplinarity: Infrastructure, identity, and interdisciplinary practice in nanoELSI research. Science and Public Policy, 49(5), pp.765-780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac025
Kumar, N., Poonia, V., Gupta, B.B. and Goyal, M.K., 2021. A novel framework for risk assessment and resilience of critical infrastructure towards climate change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, p.120532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120532
Lawal, T.O., Mustapha Abdulsalam, A.M. and Sundararajan, S., 2023. Economic and environmental implications of sustainable agricultural practices in arid regions: A cross-disciplinary analysis of plant science, management, and economics. International Journal, 10(3), pp.3100-3114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.3027
Levin, S.A., Anderies, J.M., Adger, N., Barrett, S., Bennett, E.M., Cardenas, J.C., Carpenter, S.R., Crépin, A.S., Ehrlich, P., Fischer, J. and Folke, C., 2022. Governance in the face of extreme events: Lessons from evolutionary processes for structuring interventions, and the need to go beyond. Ecosystems, 25(3), pp.697-711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00680-2
Li, Y., Xiang, P., You, K., Guo, J., Liu, Z. and Ren, H., 2021. Identifying the key risk factors of mega infrastructure projects from an extended sustainable development perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), p.7515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147515
McCowan, T., Leal Filho, W. and Brandli, L., 2021. Universities facing climate change and sustainability.
Mehvar, S., Wijnberg, K., Borsje, B., Kerle, N., Schraagen, J.M., Vinke-de Kruijf, J., Geurs, K., Hartmann, A., Hogeboom, R. and Hulscher, S., 2021. Towards resilient vital infrastructure systems–challenges, opportunities, and future research agenda. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 21(5), pp.1383-1407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1383-2021
Mihelcic, J.R. and Zimmerman, J.B., 2021. Environmental engineering: Fundamentals, sustainability, design. John wiley & sons.
Mitsova, D., 2021. Integrative interdisciplinary approaches to critical infrastructure interdependency analysis. Risk Analysis, 41(7), pp.1111-1117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13129
Mosca, F., Canepa, M. and Perini, K., 2023. Strategies for adaptation to and mitigation of climate change: key performance indicators to assess nature-based solutions performances. Urban climate, 49, p.101580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101580
Okada, A. and Gray, P., 2023. A climate change and sustainability education movement: Networks, open schooling, and the ‘CARE-KNOW-DO’framework. Sustainability, 15(3), p.2356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032356
Pal, I., Kumar, A. and Mukhopadhyay, A., 2023. Risks to coastal critical infrastructure from climate change. Annual review of environment and resources, 48(1), pp.681-712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-101903
Palin, E.J., Stipanovic Oslakovic, I., Gavin, K. and Quinn, A., 2021. Implications of climate change for railway infrastructure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(5), p.e728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.728
Pauw, W.P., König, M., Sadikhova, K. and Stutzmann, T., 2021. Financing Low-Carbon and Climate Resilient Development: Do countries integrate Article 2.1 (c) of the Paris Agreement in their long-term strategies?.
Petri, I., Rezgui, Y., Ghoroghi, A. and Alzahrani, A., 2023. Digital twins for performance management in the built environment. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 33, p.100445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100445
Prantl, J. and Goh, E., 2022. Rethinking strategy and statecraft for the twenty-first century of complexity: a case for strategic diplomacy. International Affairs, 98(2), pp.443-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab212
Rezvani, S.M., Falcão, M.J., Komljenovic, D. and de Almeida, N.M., 2023. A systematic literature review on urban resilience enabled with asset and disaster risk management approaches and GIS-based decision support tools. Applied Sciences, 13(4), p.2223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042223
Rölfer, L., Liconti, A., Prinz, N. and Klöcker, C.A., 2021. Integrated research for integrated ocean management. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, p.693373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.693373
Rözer, V., Mehryar, S. and Surminski, S., 2022. From managing risk to increasing resilience: a review on the development of urban flood resilience, its assessment and the implications for decision making. Environmental Research Letters, 17(12), p.123006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bc
Schintler, L.A. and McNeely, C.L., 2022. Artificial intelligence, institutions, and resilience: Prospects and provocations for cities. Journal of Urban Management, 11(2), pp.256-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.004
Schlüter, L., Kørnøv, L., Mortensen, L., Løkke, S., Storrs, K., Lyhne, I. and Nors, B., 2023. Sustainable business model innovation: Design guidelines for integrating systems thinking principles in tools for early-stage sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 387, p.135776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135776
Scott, M., Burns, L., Lennon, M. and Kinnane, O., 2022. Built environment climate resilience and adaptation [online]
Shaktawat, A. and Vadhera, S., 2021. Risk management of hydropower projects for sustainable development: a review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1), pp.45-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00607-2
Sinha, S.K., Davis, C., Gardoni, P., Babbar-Sebens, M., Stuhr, M., Huston, D., Cauffman, S., Williams, W.D., Alanis, L.G., Anand, H. and Vishwakarma, A., 2023. Water sector infrastructure systems resilience: A social–ecological–technical system-of-systems and whole-life approach. Cambridge Prisms: Water, 1, p.e4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/wat.2023.3
Svartzman, R., Bolton, P., Despres, M., Pereira Da Silva, L.A. and Samama, F., 2021. Central banks, financial stability and policy coordination in the age of climate uncertainty: A three-layered analytical and operational framework. Climate Policy, 21(4), pp.563-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1862743
Whitbread, A.M., Dhulipala, R.K., Nedumaran, A., Padhee, A.K., Padmaja, R., Ramraj, P., Rao, K.P.C., Shalander, K. and Zougmore, R.B., 2021. Designing climate resilient agricultural systems with some examples from India.
Zurba, M., Petriello, M.A., Madge, C., McCarney, P., Bishop, B., McBeth, S., Denniston, M., Bodwitch, H. and Bailey, M., 2022. Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut. Sustainability Science, 17(2), pp.449-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00996-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
