Selecting a methodology in Multi-Agent Systems - A Practical and Quasi-Technical Analysis of Agent-based, Object Oriented and Knowledge Engineering-based methodologies.

Authors(2) :-Kevin Mugoye, Simon Ruoro

As recognition of agents’ technology registers steady improvement over years, there is an emergent need for practical methods for developing agent applications. Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) methodologies were proposed to develop complex distributed system grounded upon the agent paradigm. Initially, the challenge was the lack of mature development methodologies for agent-based systems, efforts in the right direction to address the problem resulted in the proliferation of methodologies, which presents a new challenge that is, practitioners are challenged in that they need to select a methodology from a large number of existing methodologies. The literature in this paper suggests a necessity to the understanding of the classification of AOSE methodologies. We advocate for a view that is in twofold, first, practitioners need to first understand in a wide sense the categories of AOSE methodologies, so as to correctly link it to their intended agent solution, secondly, identify a methodology considering the availability of support features such as maturity, availability of documentation and support tools.

Authors and Affiliations

Kevin Mugoye
Department of Computer Science, Maseno University, Private Bag, Maseno, Kenya
Simon Ruoro
Department of Computer Science, Maseno University, Private Bag, Maseno, Kenya

Multi-Agent System, Agent Based Methodologies, Artificial Intelligence

  1. P. Bresciani, A. Perini, P.Giorgini, F.Giunchiglia, J. Mylopoulos, Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology (Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems), Volume 8, Number 3, (2004) 203—236.
  2. B. Bauber, J. Odell. UML 2.0 and agents: how to builds agent based system with new UML standard, Journal of engineering applications of AI 18(2) (2005).
  3. M. Luck, P. McBurney, C. Preist, Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing (A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing), AgentLink, 2003, ISBN 0854 327886.
  4. B. Henderson-Sellers, P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2005) 107-135.
  5. F. Bergenti, M.-P. Gleizes, F. Zambonelli (Eds.), Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishing (New York), 2004.
  6. S. A. DeLoach, M. F. Wood, C. H. Sparkman, Multiagent systems engineering, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 11 (3) (2001) 231–258.
  7. S. A. DeLoach, J. C. Garcia-Ojeda, O-MaSE: A customizable approach to developing multiagent development processes, International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 4 (2010) 244–280. doi:10.1504/IJAOSE.2010.036984.
  8. P. Bresciani, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia, J. Mylopoulos, A. Perini, Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology, Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (JAAMAS) 8 (2004) 203–236.
  9. F. Zambonelli, N. R. Jennings, M. Wooldridge, Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 12 (3) (2003) 317–370. doi:10.1145/958961.958963.
  10. L. Padgham, M.Winikoff, Developing intelligent agent systems: A practical guide, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2004, ISBN 0-470-86120-7.
  11. J. Pavon, J. J. Gomez-Sanz, R. Fuentes, The INGENIAS methodology and tools, in: B. Henderson-Sellers, P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Idea Group Publishing, (2005) 236–276.
  12. J. Pav´on, J. G´omez-Sanz, Agent oriented software engineering with INGENIAS, in: V. Mar´?k, M. Pechoucek, J. M¨uller (Eds.), Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III, Vol. 2691 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, (2003) 394–403.
  13. R. Cervenka, I. Trencansky, AML The Agent Modeling Language: A Comprehensive Approach to Modeling Multi-Agent Systems, Birkh¨auser, 2007, ISBN 978-3-7643-8395-4.
  14. M. Cossentino, V. Seidita, PASSI2 - going towards maturity of the PASSI process, Technical Report RT-ICAR-PA-09-02 (December 2009).
  15.  M. Cossentino, From requirements to code with the PASSI methodology, in: B. Henderson-Sellers, P. Giorgini (Eds.), Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Idea Group Inc., (2005) 79–106.
  16. M. Elammari , W. Lalonde, :An agent –Oriented Methodology: High- Level and Intermediate Models HLIM. In Proceedings of AOIS, Heidelberg (1999)
  17. S. Munroe, T. Miller, R. A. Belecheanu, M. P?echou?cek, P. McBurney, M. Luck, Crossing the agent technology chasm: Lessons, experiences and challenges in commercial applications of agents, Knowledge Engineering Review 21 (4) (2006) 345–392. doi:10.1017/S0269888906001020.
  18. L. Padgham, M. Winikoff, Prometheus: A methodology for developing intelligent agents Agent-oriented software engineering III, (2002)174-185.
  19. A.Omicini, Societies and Infrastructures in the analysis and Design of Agent-Based Systems. P. Ciancarini, and M. Wooldridge (Eds.) Agent Oriented Software engineering, Springer-Verlag, (2001) 185-193.
  20. G.Bush, S.Cranefield, M. Purvis: The Styx agent methodology (Information Science Discussion Papers Series No. 2001/02). University of Otago. Retrieved from, (2001).
  21. A .Collinot, P .Carle, K .Zengal : A Method for designing computational organizations, In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Decentralized Intelligent Multi-Agent Systems, Poland, (1995).
  22. M. Gervais, ODAC: An Agent-Oriented Methodology based on ODP. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 7(3), (2003) 99-228.
  23. S. DeLoach: The MaSE Methodology. In F. Bergenti, M.P. Gleizes & F.Zambonelli (Eds.), Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems: The Agent Oriented Software Engineering Handbook, Kluwer academic publishing, (2004) 107-125.
  24. J. Lind: Iterative software engineering for multiagent systems, The MASSIVE Method, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (2001).
  25. F. Brazier, B. Dunin-Keplicz, N. Jennings, J. Treur ,DESIRE: modelling multi-agent systems in a compositional formal framework, Int J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 6(1), (1997) 67-94.
  26. D. Kinny, M. Georgeff, A. Rao ,A methodology and modeling technique for systems of BDI agents, In Proceedings of the Seventh European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a MultiAgent World (MAAMAW-96), Netherlands: Springer, (1996) 56- 71.
  27. E. Kendall, M. Malkoun , C. Jiang, A Methodology for Developing Agent Based Systems for Enterprize Integration, in P. Bernus and L. Nemes, editors, Modelling and Methodologies for Enterprise Integration, Chapman and Hall, 1996.
  28. B. Burmeister, Models and Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design, in Fischer K. editor, Working Notes of the KI'96 Workshop on Agent-Oriented Programming and Distributed Artificial Intelligence, DFKI document D-96-06,, 1996.
  29. B. Moulin and L. Cloutier, Collaborative work based on multiagent architectures: A methodological perspective. In Fred Aminzadeh and Mohammad Jamshidi, editors, Soft Computing: Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Prentice-Hall, (1994) 261–296.
  30. C. Iglesias, M. Garijo, J. Gonzalez,J. Velasco. Analysis and design of multiagent systems using MAS-CommonKADS. In AAAI’97 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, Providence, RI, July 1997. ATAL. (An extended version of this paper has been published in INTELLIGENT AGENTS IV: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Springer-Verlag, (1998).
  31. C. Iglesias, M. Garijo, J. Gonzalez .A Survey of Agent-Oriented Methodologies, in Intelligent Agents IV: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, 1555 of LNAI, Springer-Verlag (1999) 317-330.
  32. N. Glaser .The CoMoMAS Methodology and Environment for Multi-Agent System Development, Proceedings of the Second Australian Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence: Multi-Agent Systems: Methodologies and Applications, Springer-Verlag (1997) 1-16.
  33. M. Wooldridge and R. Jennings, Pitfalls of Agent-Oriented Development, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agent 98), Minneapolis/St. Paul: ACM Press, (1998) 385-391.
  34. J. Odell, Objects and Agents Compared, in Journal of Object Technology, 1 (1) (2002) 41-53.

Publication Details

Published in : Volume 2 | Issue 3 | May-June 2017
Date of Publication : 2017-06-30
License:  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page(s) : 661-669
Manuscript Number : CSEIT1723207
Publisher : Technoscience Academy

ISSN : 2456-3307

Cite This Article :

Kevin Mugoye, Simon Ruoro, "Selecting a methodology in Multi-Agent Systems - A Practical and Quasi-Technical Analysis of Agent-based, Object Oriented and Knowledge Engineering-based methodologies. ", International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), ISSN : 2456-3307, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp.661-669, May-June-2017.
Journal URL :

Article Preview

Follow Us

Contact Us